Scheme 3
Table 3. Synthesis of Vinylogous N-Boc R-Amino Esters 5
product
R
yield of 5 (%)
ee of 5 (%)
5a
5f
5h
PhCH2
CH2dCH(CH2)7
PhCH2O(CH2)4
76
51
52
95
93
97
allylic azide 4r to the thermodynamically favored27 conju-
gated ester azide 4γ; subsequent azide reduction and protec-
tion yielded the known26 γ-amino conjugated ester 5a(Fmoc)
in 60% yield (Scheme 4).
(21) Experimental Details for γ-Seleno-r,ꢀ-ethylenic Ester (S)-1a.
To a 500 mL round-bottomed flask with stirbar under argon was added
3-phenylpropanal (2.68 g, 20.00 mmol, 1.00 equiv) in toluene (50 mL).
(S)-R,R-Bis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2-pyrrolidinemethanol trimeth-
ylsilyl ether (2.39 g, 4.00 mmol, 0.20 equiv) was added and the reaction
was allowed to cool to -20°C and stirred for 5 min at that temperature.
N-(Phenylseleno)phthalimide (7.85 g, 26.00 mmol, 1.30 equiv) was added
in one portion and the reaction was allowed to stir for 2 h at -20°C. At
this time TLC analysis indicated complete reaction, and the flask was further
cooled to -40 °C and anhydrous THF (150 mL) was added dropwise via
pressure equalizing addition funnel. A solution of (tert-butoxycarbonylm-
ethylene)triphenylphosphorane (10.15 g, 27.00 mmol, 1.35 equiv) in
anhydrous THF (100 mL) was added dropwise via pressure equalizing
addition funnel. After addition was completed the reaction was warmed to
-20°C and the reaction was allowed to stir overnight. At this time TLC
analysis indicated complete reaction. The reaction was quenched with sat.
NH4Cl solution, then the aqueous layer was separated and extracted with
Et2O (3×). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO4,
filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting crude oil was purified
via column chromatography (1% EtOAc in hexanes) to yield the desired
ester 1a (7.00 g, 18.00 mmol) as a pale yellow oil in 91% yield.
Experimental Details for r-Chloro-ꢀ,γ-ethylenic Ester (S)-2a. To a 500
mL round-bottomed flask with a stirbar under argon was added ester 1a
(7.0 g, 18.0 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in hexanes (67 mL). Ethyl vinyl ether (21.0
mL, 220.0 mmol, 12.0 equiv) was added followed by the dropwise addition
of a solution of sulfuryl chloride (2.9 mL, 36.0 mmol, 2.0 equiv) in hexanes
(140 mL) via pressure equalizing addition funnel. After 10 min TLC analysis
indicated complete reaction. The volatiles were removed by rotary evapora-
tion and the resulting crude oil was immediately purified via column
chromatography (1% EtOAc in hexanes). The chloride 2a was isolated as
a yellow oil (3.5 g, 13.0 mmol) in 75% yield and 97% ee as determined by
chiral HPLC. Experimental Details for γ-Methyl-r,ꢀ-ethylenic Ester (R)-
3a. To a 250 mL three-necked round-bottomed flask with a stir bar under
argon was added CuCN (1.24 g, 13.80 mmol, 1.05 equiv) in anhydrous
THF (85 mL). The suspension was cooled to -78 °C and a solution of 3
M MeMgBr in Et2O (9.20 mL, 27.60 mmol, 2.10 equiv) was added
dropwise via syringe over 5 min and the resulting solution was allowed to
stir for 30 min at -78 °C. At this time a solution of chloride 2a (3.50 g,
13.15 mmol, 1.00 equiv) in anhydrous THF (50 mL) was added dropwise
via pressure equalizing addition funnel over 15 min. After addition was
completed the reaction was allowed to stir for an additional 30 min after
which TLC analysis indicated complete reaction. The reaction was quenched
with sat. NH4Cl. The aqueous layer was separated and extracted with Et2O
(3×). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO4, the
solids were filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. The resulting
crude oil was purified via column chromatography to yield the ester 3a
(2.80 g, 11.30 mmol) as a colorless oil in 88% yield and in 95% ee as
determined by chiral HPLC.
has distinct advantages over previously reported asymmetric
syntheses of this pheromone in terms of stereochemical
purity,14 number of steps, and total yield.17 Furthermore, the
chiral γ-methyl-R,ꢀ-enoate structural unit is present in many
natural products, including steroids,18 macrolides,19 and
squalestatins.20 The scalability of this short protocol was
confirmed when 2.8 g of γ-methyl ester 3a was synthesized
in 60% overall yield and 95% ee starting with commercial
3-phenylpropanal.21 Lithium dimethylcuprate (Me2CuLi) also
gave exclusive SN2′ methylation but in much lower yield
than the magnesiocuprate used in Table 2. Attempts to
synthesize other γ-alkyl-R,ꢀ-ethylenic esters with this mag-
nesiocuprate allylic substitution procedure yielded mixtures
of inseparable R- and γ-substitution products. We do not
yet understand fully the critical factors that determine R- vs
γ-substitution.
Syntheses of non-natural γ-amino-R,ꢀ-ethylenic esters
(vinylogous R-amino esters)22 5 (Scheme 1) are appealing
due to these amino esters having diverse chemical properties
ranging from induction of a non-natural secondary structure
in polypeptides23 to inhibition of enzyme function.24 To this
end, we treated allylic chlorides 2 with sodium azide,
followed by in situ stannous chloride reduction to the amine,
which was then treated with di-tert-butyl dicarbonate af-
fording the N-Boc-γ-amino-R,ꢀ-ethylenic tert-butyl esters 5
(Scheme 1, Table 3) in good yields and with faithful 1,3-
anti-transfer of chirality. Anti-SN2′ substitutions with nitrogen
nucleophiles are well documented.25 The stereochemical
course of this transformation was confirmed to be 1,3-anti
by comparing the [R]D +14.4 optical rotation of the Fmoc-
γ-amino-R,ꢀ-ethylenic tert-butyl ester 5a (Fmoc) with that
of the known standard.26 We cannot rule out the possibility
that this substitution proceeded via an initial direct SN2
mechanism with stereochemical inversion followed by a
spontaneous syn-3,3-sigmatropic rearrangement of the initial
(22) Soto-Cairoli, B.; Justo de Pomar, J. J.; Soderquist, J. A. Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 333.
(23) (a) Hagihara, M.; Anthony, N. J.; Stout, T. J.; Clardy, J.; Schreiber,
S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 6568. (b) Baldauf, C.; Gunther, R.;
Hofmann, H. HelV. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 2573. (c) Grison, C.; Coutrot, P.;
Geneve, S.; Didierjean, C.; Marraud, M. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10753.
(24) (a) Hanzlik, R. P.; Thompson, S. A. J. Med. Chem. 1984, 27, 711.
(b) Dragovich, P. S.; Prins, T. J.; Zhou, R.; Fuhrman, S. A.; Patick, A. K.;
Mathews, D. A.; Ford, C. E.; Meador, J. W., III; Ferre, R. A.; Worland,
S. T. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 1203. (c) Powers, J. C.; Asgian, J. L.; Ekici,
O. D.; James, K. E. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 4639.
(17) Lu, C.; Li, D.; Wang, Q.; Yang, G.; Chen, Z. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 1078.
(18) Vanderah, D. J.; Djerassi, C. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 1442.
(19) Dai, W.; Chen, Y.; Jin, J.; Wu, J.; Lou, J.; He, Q. Synlett 2008, 11,
1737.
(25) Mulzer, J.; Funk, G. Synthesis 1995, 101.
(20) Nicolaou, K. C.; Yue, E. W.; Naniwa, Y.; De Riccardis, F.; Nadin,
A.; Leresche, J. E.; La Greca, S.; Yang, Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1994,
33, 2184.
(26) Concellon, J. M.; Mejica, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 5250.
(27) (a) Gagnon, D.; Lauzon, S.; Godbout, C.; Spino, C. Org. Lett. 2005,
7, 4769. (b) Trost, B. M.; Pulley, S. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 8737.
4696
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 20, 2010