Organic Letters
Letter
Finally, the temperature screen revealed that the reaction was
less efficient at 100 °C, while minor improvement in the
efficiency was observed at 140 °C (entries 31−32). It is worth
noting that the optimized conditions are quite distinct from
Ru(II)-catalyzed C−H arylation of benzamides,26a wherein the
generation of TfOH was found to be critical to promote the
reaction. We hypothesize that in the present case the
carboxylate base assists in breaking the S−Ru coordination;27
however, the involvement of a Ru(II) carboxylate system
cannot be excluded at this point.19,23
observed in the case of meta-substituted thiobenzamides
(3ha−3ia), including electron-deficient chloro-substituted
arene (3ia). Moreover, the reaction could be extended to
polyaromatic substrates, such as naphthalene (3ja), and
heterocyclic substrates, such as thiophene (3ka). At this
point, ortho-substitution is not tolerated.19 Importantly, in all
cases, only the mono-C−H arylation product was observed.
The scope of the reaction with respect to the boronic acid
component is also broad (Scheme 2). Electronically differ-
Next, the scope of this novel C−H arylation process of
thiobenzamides was examined (Scheme 1). We found that the
Scheme 2. C−H Arylation of Tertiary Thiobenzamides:
a
Scope of Nucleophiles
Scheme 1. C−H Arylation of Tertiary Thiobenzamides:
a b
,
Scope of Thiobenzamides
a
entiated boronic acids, including electron-rich (3ab−3ac) and
electron-deficient (3ad−3ag) nucleophiles were well tolerated.
Noteworthy is the functional group tolerance to biorelevant
fluoro motifs (3ae) and the use of sensitive halide substituents,
such as chloro (3ag), bromo (3ah), and iodo (3ai), that could
be utilized in subsequent functionalization. Moreover, longer
alkyl chains on the aryl boronic acid (3aj) and biaryl-based
boronic acids (3ak) are well compatible with this reaction.
Next, we were curious to investigate the impact of the N-
substitution on the thiobenzamide scaffold on this C−H
functionalization (Scheme 3). Pleasingly, this reaction well
accommodates challenging N,N-acyclic thiobenzamides, such
as N,N-dimethyl (3la) and N,N-diethyl (3ma) without
competing dealkylation, including even the sterically hindered
N,N-di-isopropylbenzamide (3na), albeit in a lower yield.
Moreover, a privileged cyclic N-piperidynyl ring is also well
tolerated (3na). At the present stage, ortho-substituted
substrates are not compatible. This is a general feature of
Ru(II)/(0)-catalysis enabling high monoarylation selectivi-
ty.19,26j We hypothesize that catalyst poisoning is less likely in
this case because of switchable N-thioamide/N-thioamidate
coordination. We believe that the role of Cu(OTf)2 is to
facilitate the formation of a cationic Ru(II) species.21,23 The
proposed mechanism involves triflate-promoted ortho-cyclo-
ruthenation, transmetalation, reductive elimination, and
Ru(0)/(II) reoxidation pathway.
a
Conditions: thioamide (R′,R″ = pyrrolidine, 1.0 equiv), [RuCl2(p-
cymene)]2 (5 mol %), PhB(OH)2 (1.5 equiv), Ag2O (2 equiv),
Cu(OTf)2 (2 equiv), K2CO3 (2 equiv), 2-MeTHF (0.25 M), 120 °C,
b
20 h. Isolated yields. X-ray structure of (3fa) and (3ja).
Crystallographic data have been deposited under CCDC 2011649
scope of this reaction is broad and supersedes all current
methods for the stoichiometric and catalytic arylation of the
thiobenzamide moiety. The scope includes electron-neutral
(3aa), electron-rich (3ba−3ca), and electron-deficient (3da−
3fa) thiobenzamide substrates. It is noteworthy that the
reaction tolerates readily modifiable halide substituents, such
as chloro (3fa) and bromo (3ga). Full regioselectivity is
Preliminary mechanistic studies were carried out to gain
insight into this intriguing C−H activation process (Scheme
4). (1) Intermolecular competition experiments with differ-
ently substituted thioamides revealed that electron-deficient
thioamides react preferentially, consistent with a concerted
C
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX