´
5525
M. Suchy et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 5521–5526
20. For the recent review on disulfide bond formation see: Witt, D. Synthesis 2008,
2491.
21. Lu, Z. R.; Wang, X.; Parker, D. L.; Goodrich, K. C.; Buswell, H. R. Bioconjugate
Chem. 2003, 14, 715.
based compounds, particularly at the low concentrations used in
the current study, the other mechanisms may each contribute to
some extent.
22. Major, J. L.; Meade, T. J. Acc. Chem. Res 2009, 42, 893. and references cited
therein.
23. Thonon, D.; Jacques, V.; Desreux, J. F. Contrast Med. Mol. Imaging 2007, 2, 24.
24. Mattila, K.; Siltainsuu, J.; Balaspiri, L.; Ora, M.; Lönnberg, H. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2005, 3, 3039.
25. Wu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Ouari, O.; Woods, M.; Zhao, P.; Soesbe, T. C.; Kiefer, G. E.;
Sherry, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13854.
26. Vasalaitiy, O.; Gerard, R. G.; Zhao, P.; Sun, X.; Sherry, A. D. Bioconjugate Chem.
2008, 19, 598.
27. Pikkemaat, J. A.; Wegh, R. T.; Lamerichs, R.; van de Molengraaf, R. A.; Langereis,
S.; Burdinski, D.; Raymond, A. Y. F.; Jansse, H. M.; de Waal, B. F. M.; Willard, N.
P.; Meijer, E. W.; Grüll, H. Contrast Med. Mol. Imaging 2007, 2, 229.
28. Ali, M. M.; Yoo, B.; Pagel, M. D. Mol. Pharm. 2009, 6, 1409.
29. Nwe, K.; Andolina, C. M.; Huang, C. H.; Morrow, J. R. Bioconjugate Chem. 2009,
20, 1375.
30. Suchy´, M.; Li, A. X.; Bartha, R.; Hudson, R. H. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 1087.
31. For the recent review on conjugation of DOTA-derived ligands with peptides
see: De León-Rodríguez, L. M.; Kovacs, Z. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 391.
32. General experimental procedures: All reagents were commercially available,
unless otherwise stated. Protected peptide 7 (protecting groups R-Pbf, Q-Trt, K-
Boc, Y-tBu, ‘N’-terminal Fmoc) attached to Wang’s resin was custom
synthesized. All solvents were HPLC grade and used as such, except for
In summary we have shown, that sulfanyl modified ligand 1 can
be used as a starting material for the synthesis of peptide conju-
gated as well as dimeric PARACEST MRI CAs based on a DOTAM-
Gly-L-Phe-OH scaffold. A linear correlation between the tempera-
ture and the chemical shift of bound water was observed with
model complex 5 and dimeric Eu3+-based complex 4b. Considering
the significant increase in sensitivity of CA 4b compared to the
monomeric structures 2b and 5, this compound may be useful
for the purpose of temperature mapping. The increase of sensitivity
in the case of Dy3+ derived dimer 4a is modest, indicating that
more than two metal centers are required to boost the sensitivity
in to a practically useful range. Studies on cellular uptake of CA 3
are currently in progress and will be reported in due course.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
(OICR) for the financial support of this work.
water (18.2 M
X cm millipore water). Solvents were removed under reduced
pressure in a rotary evaporator. Aqueous solutions were lyophilized. HPLC
analysis and purification was carried out using a radial compression module
C18 300 Å column (particle size 15
lm; 8 Â 100 mm cartridge) monitored by a
Supplementary data
diode array detector (wavelength range 190–600 nm). Mobile phase: Method
A: 90% H2O/10% MeCN—100% MeCN over 20 min, linear gradient, flow rate
3 mL/min. UPLC analysis was carried out using a C18 column (particle size
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
1.7
lm; 2.1 i.d. Â 50 mm) and monitored by a diode array (wavelength range
190–600 nm) and HR-ESI-TOF-MS detectors. Mobile phase: Method B: 100%
H2O—25% H2O/75% MeCN over 3 min, linear gradient, flow rate 0.25 mL/min;
mass spectra (MS) were obtained on TOF mass spectrometer, using electron
spray (ESI) for ionization. CEST spectra associated with CAs 4 and 5 have been
acquired on 400 MHz (9.4 T) NMR spectrometer in water or in 80% water/20%
MeCN as described previously.18b Temperature was controlled by blowing
warm air over each phantom using a small animal monitoring and gating
system and monitored using a fibre optic probe placed in a separate adjacent
phantom.
References and notes
1. For the recent reviews on MRI CAs see: (a) Yoo, B.; Pagel, M. D. Front. Biosci.
2008, 13, 1733; (b) Geraldes, C. F. G. C.; Laurent, S. Contrast Med. Mol. Imaging
ˇ
2009, 4, 1; (c) Kubícek, V.; Tóth, É.. In Advances in Inorganic Chemistry; Elsevier
Academic Press: San Diego, 2009; Vol. 61; (d) Terreno, E.; Delli Castelli, D.;
Viale, A.; Aime, S. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3019.
33. Synthesis of Eu3+ DOTAM-Gly-
L-Phe-OH peptide conjugate 3: In a manual peptide
synthesis vessel, resin (150 mg) containing the protected peptide (7,
7.62 Â 10À5 mol) was treated with 20% piperidine in DMF (2 mL, repeated
twice) for 5 min. The resin was consecutively washed with dry DMF and CH2Cl2
2. For the seminal paper introducing this idea see: Ward, K. M.; Aletras, A. H.;
Balaban, R. S. J. Magn. Reson. 2000, 143, 79.
3. For the recent reviews on PARACEST MRI CAs see: (a) Woods, M.; Woessner, D.
E.; Sherry, A. D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 500; (b) Sherry, A. D.; Woods, M. Annu.
Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 10, 391; (c) Terreno, E.; Delli Castelli, D.; Aime, S.
Contrast Med. Mol. Imaging 2010, 5, 78; (d) Wu, Y.; Evbuomwan, M.; Melendez,
M.; Opina, A.; Sherry, A. D. Future Med. Chem. 2010, 2, 351; (e) Viswanathan, S.;
Kovács, Z.; Green, K. N.; Ratnakar, S. J.; Sherry, A. D. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2960.
4. Zhang, R. S.; Merrit, M.; Woessner, D. E.; Lenkinski, R.; Sherry, A. D. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2003, 36, 783.
(ca. 2 Â 10 mL each, repeated twice). In
a
separate vial DIPEA (110
l
L,
a
6.30 Â 10À4 mol) and HBTU (107 mg, 2.84 Â 10À4 mol) were added to
cooled (0 °C) solution of Fmoc-Cys(Trt)-OH (6, 185 mg, 3.15 Â 10À4 mol) in
DMF (700 lL). The resulting mixture was added (after 10 min at 0 °C) to the
washed resin in a peptide vessel followed by agitation for 1.5 hour at rt. The
resin was washed as described above and was treated with cleavage cocktail
(5 mL, for 1.5 h at rt) prepared by dissolving water (300 lL) and TES (200 lL) in
TFA (10 mL). The TFA solution was concentrated to ca. 10% of its original
volume, was cooled to 0 °C, cold (À20 °C) Et2O (20 mL) was added and the
mixture was set aside for 1 h at À20 °C. The resulting mixture was transferred
to centrifuge tubes, was centrifuged (1000 rpm for 3 min), the supernatant was
decanted and the pellet was dissolved in water (3 mL). The aqueous solution
thus obtained was lyophilized to afford 54 mg of the crude Fmoc-CYG-RKK-
RRQ-RRR. This material was purified by semi-preparative HPLC (Method A),32
fractions were concentrated to leave the peptide 8 (25.8 mg, 19%) as colorless
solid; HPLC: tR 8.0 min. A stock solution of diethylazodicarboxylate (DEAD,
5. (a) Terreno, E.; Delli Castelli, D.; Cravotto, G.; Milone, L.; Aime, S. Invest. Radiol.
2004, 39, 235; (b) Zhang, S.; Malloy, C. R.; Sherry, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 17572.
6. (a) Aime, S.; Delli Castelli, D.; Terreno, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4334;
(b) Aime, S.; Barge, A.; Delli Castelli, D.; Fedeli, F.; Mortilarro, A.; Nielsen, F. U.;
Terreno, E. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002, 47, 639.
7. (a) Zhang, S.; Trokowski, R.; Sherry, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15288; (b)
Trokowski, R.; Zhang, S.; Sherry, A. D. Bioconjugate Chem. 2004, 15, 1431.
8. Aime, S.; Delli Castelli, D.; Terreno, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4527.
9. Aime, S.; Delli Castelli, D.; Fedeli, F.; Terreno, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
9364.
10. Huang, C. H.; Morrow, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4206.
11. Trokowski, R.; Ren, J.; Kalman, F. K.; Sherry, A. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
6920.
0.1 M) was prepared by dissolving DEAD (16 ll) in dry DMF (1 ml). DEAD
solution in DMF (0.1 M, 14.4
tube containing dry DMF (100
l
l, 1.44 Â 10À5 mol) was added to a centrifuge
l
l), followed by the addition of Et3N (40 ll,
2.88 Â 10À4 mol) and cooling to 0 °C. In a separate Eppendorf tube sulfanyl
modified DOTAM-Gly-Phe-OH 1 (18.4 mg, 1.44 Â 10À5 mol) was dissolved in
dry DMF (350 ll) and the solution obtained was added dropwise (over 2 min,
12. Suchy´, M.; Ta, R.; Li, A. X.; Wojciechowski, F.; Pasternak, S. H.; Bartha, R.;
with stirring) to a previously prepared DEAD and Et3N solution (kept at 0 °C).
The ice bath was removed and stirring continued for 10 min at rt after which
time the mixture obtained was then transferred to another centrifuge tube
containing peptide 8 (25.8 mg, 1.44 Â 10À5 mol). The resulting suspension was
stirred for 48 h at rt, then it was diluted with water (ca. 4 ml) and finally
lyophilized to afford 32 mg of the residue. This residue was purified by semi-
preparative HPLC (Method A),32 fractions were concentrated to leave DOTAM-
Gly-Phe-TAT disulfide conjugate 9 (11.2 mg, 27%) as colorless solid; HPLC: tR
7.9 min. HRMS (ESI) m/z: found 2940.5361 [M+H]+ (2940.5215 calcd for
Hudson, R. H. E. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 2560.
13. Chauvin, T.; Durand, P.; Bernier, M.; Meudal, H.; Doan, B. T.; Noury, F.; Badet,
B.; Beloeil, J. C.; Tóth, É. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4370.
14. (a) Yoo, B.; Pagel, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14032; (b) Yoo, B.; Raam, M.
S.; Rosenblum, R. M.; Pagel, M. D. Contrast Med. Mol. Imaging 2007, 2, 189.
15. Yoo, B.; Sheth, V. R.; Pagel, M. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 4459.
16. (a) Ali, M. M.; Liu, G.; Shah, T.; Flask, C. A.; Pagel, M. D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42,
915. and references cited therein.; For the recent example from our laboratory
see: (b) Jones, C. K.; Li, A. X.; Suchy´, M.; Hudson, R. H. E.; Menon, R. S.; Bartha, R.
Magn. Reson. Med. 2010, 63, 1184.
C129H203N46O30S2). EuCl3Á6H2O (41 mg, 1.12 Â 10À4 mol) was added to
a
solution of DOTAM-Gly-Phe-TAT disulfide conjugate
9
(16.5 mg,
17. Suchy´, M.; Li, A. X.; Bartha, R.; Hudson, R. H. E. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 3588.
18. (a) Wojciechowski, F.; Suchy´, M.; Li, A. X.; Azab, H. A.; Bartha, R.; Hudson, R. H.
5.60 Â 10À6 mol) in water (1 ml). The mixture was incubated for 72 h at
60 °C, then cooled to rt and was subjected for purification by semi-preparative
HPLC (Method A),32 fractions were concentrated to leave Eu3+ DOTAM-Gly-
Phe-TAT disulfide conjugate 3 (11.2 mg, 65%) as colorless solid; HPLC: tR
7.8 min. HRMS (ESI) m/z: found 3090.4192 [MÀ2H]+ (3090.4068 calcd for
´
E. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007, 18, 1625; (b) Li, A. X.; Wojciechowski, F.; Suchy, M.;
Jones, C. K.; Hudson, R. H. E.; Menon, R. S.; Bartha, R. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008,
59, 374.
19. For the recent review on the use of cell penetrating peptides in drug delivery
see: Stewart, K. M.; Horton, K. L.; Kelly, S. O. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2242.
C129H200N46O30S2Eu).