Article
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 49, No. 20, 2010 9341
5493 Hz for Pt2NF, and 6409 Hz for Pt3NF. The polymer
“cocktails” for the sensor films were prepared by dissolving the
metal complex and polystyrene in chloroform (10% w/w of PS
in CHCl3). The “cocktails” were knife-coated on the Mylar
support to give, after solvent evaporation, phosphorescent
sensor films with a thickness of 2.5 μm. The films contained
∼1% (w/w) of the dye in the polymer. For phase angle measure-
ments in polymeric films, the following modulation frequencies
were applied: 1831 Hz for Pd1NF, 4578 Hz for Pd2NF and
Pd3NF, 6409 Hz for Pt1NF, 8240 Hz for Pt2NF, and 10986 Hz
for Pt3NF. Excitation of the complexes was performed with a
(Schott) for emission for all phase angle measurements. Tem-
perature was controlled by a ThermoHaake DC50 cryostat at
25 °C. Gas calibration mixtures were obtained using a gas
mixing device (MKS, www.mksinst.com).
Photostability of the dyes in polymeric films was determined
using a lock-in amplifier from PreSens. Sensor foils were posi-
tioned at 30° relative to the photodiode and the light source.
Continuous irradiation was performed with the light of a 450 nm
filtered through a BG 12 filter. An RG 9 filter (Schott) was used
for the emission. The same modulation frequencies as for oxygen
sensitivity measurements were applied. The bleaching rates were
corrected for the amount of the absorbed light at 456 nm. Photo-
stability of the complexes in DMF solution was determined con-
Ligand Synthesis via the Lindsey Method. 4,5,6,7-Tetrahy-
droisoindole (529.8 mg, 4.37 mmol, 0.52 equiv) and 4,9-dihydro-
2H-benz[f]isoindole (673.5 mg, 3.98 mmol, 0.48 equiv) were
dissolved in dry CH2Cl2 (835 mL). The reaction mixture was
degassed for 20 min with N2. The stirred mixture was protected
from light and stirred under N2. 4-Fluorobenzaldehyde (896 μL,
1.04 g, 8.35 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was added, and the reaction
mixture was kept in the dark under N2 and stirred for 10 min.
BF3 Et2O (210 μL, 237 mg, 1.7 mmol, 0.2 equiv) was added in
3
one portion, and the mixture was allowed to react at room
temperature for 1 h. After 1 h, triethylorthoacetate (TEOAc;
1531 μL, 1355 mg, 8.35 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was added, and the
reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min.
After 30 min, BF3 Et2O (40 μL, 45.2 mg, 0.32 mmol, 0.04 equiv)
3
was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred for an addi-
tional 30 min. Finally, one last portion of BF3 Et2O (40 μL, 45.2
3
mg, 0.32 mmol, 0.04 equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture
was stirred for 2 h. After an overall reaction time of 4 h, DDQ
(9.5 g, 41.8 mmol, 5.0 equiv) was added to the mixture in one
portion, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature over-
night. The resulting mixture was washed with 10% aq. Na2SO3
(2 ꢀ 100 mL) and with water (2 ꢀ 100 mL). The combined organic
phases were dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was evaporated, and
the resulting residue was purified by column chromatography on
neutral alumina (3NF: toluene, CH2Cl2/toluene = 1:1 (v/v),
CH2Cl2; 2NF: CH2Cl2 þ 1% THF; 1NF: CH2Cl2 þ 2% THF).
The three main fractions were isolated as green solids with an
overall yield of 42%.
tinuously irradiating the samples with a red LED array (λmax
=
MALDI-TOF mass spectra were recorded on a Micromass
TofSpec 2E. The instrument is equipped with a nitrogen laser
(337 nm wavelength, operated at a frequency of 5 Hz) and a time
lag focusing unit. Spectra were taken in reflectron mode at an
accelerating voltage of þ20 kV. Analysis of the data was done
with MassLynx 3.4 (Micromass, Manchester, U.K.). Samples
were dissolved in THF (1 mg/cm3). Dithranol or retinoic acid
was used as the matrix (10 mg/cm3 in THF). Solutions were
mixed in the cap of a microtube in a ratio of 1:10 μL. A total of
0.5 μL of the resulting mixture was spotted onto the target and
air-dried.
Density functional theory calculations were performed using
the Turbomole 5.7 software suite.26 The B3LYP exchange
correlation functional27 was employed together with the SVP
basis set28 and relativistic effective core potentials for Pd and
Pt.29 Geometry optimizations were performed explointing sym-
metry where possible. After the optmization, frequency calcula-
tions without imaginary frequencies ensured that a true
minimum was reached. To obtain planar geometries, a biased
start geometry was constructed. The planarity was enforced by
increasing the symmetry point group accordingly. Frequency
calculations performed after the geometry optmization showed
four imaginary frequencies. Optical excitations were calculated
within the time-dependent DFT framework. For all molecules,
the 10 lowest lying excitations of each irreducible representation
were collected. Test calculations using the higher quality
TZVP30 basis set for the exitations only yielded the same general
shape of the spectra. The transitions were slightly red-shifted
and therefore in even better agreement with the experiment.
1NF. Yield: 254.8 mg, 29%. 1H NMR (δ, 20 °C, CDCl3, 300
MHz): 8.46-8.12 (m, 8H), 7.73-7.39 (m, 14H), 2.51-2.17 (m,
12H), 1.74-1.67 (m, 12H). MALDI-TOF: m/z 949.3837, calcd
949.3893. UV-vis, toluene, λmax nm (relative intensity): 460
(1.00), 548 (0.11), 586 (0.08), 628 (0.07), 690 (0.04).
2NF. Yield: 301.3 mg, 34%. 1H NMR (δ, 20 °C, CDCl3, 300
MHz): 8.33-8.08 (m, 8H), 7.72-7.39 (m, 20H), 1.69-1.47 (m,
8H), 2.54-2.24 (m, 8H). 13C NMR (δ, 20 °C, CDCl3, 500 MHz):
165.2, 164.8, 164.6, 164.5, 163.2, 162.8, 162.6, 162.5, 142.2,
138.7, 138.6, 137.88, 137.86, 137.43, 137.41, 136.5, 136.4,
136.0, 135.92, 135.88, 135.82, 131.7, 131.5, 130.78, 130.76,
130.3, 130.2, 129.4, 129.2, 128.3, 128.2, 126.98, 126.96, 126.7,
126.4, 126.2, 124.4, 123.7, 116.6, 116.5, 116.4, 116.2, 115.9,
115.8, 115.6, 115.2, 115.0, 29.9, 29.5, 27.8, 25.9, 25.8, 24.5,
23.6, 23.5. 19F NMR (δ, 20 °C, CDCl3, 500 MHz): -113.6
(2F), -109.5 (1F). MALDI-TOF: m/z 995.3709, calcd 995.3737.
UV-vis, toluene, λmax nm (relative intensity): 471 (1.00), 589
(0.09), 630 (0.13), 691 (0.04).
3NF. Yield: 324.2 mg, 37%. 1H NMR (δ, 20 °C, CDCl3, 300
MHz): 8.33-8.20 (m, 8H), 7.81-7.36 (m, 22H), 7.28-7.26 (m,
4H, ovelap with solvent), 2.55-2.41 (m, 4H), 1.68-1.54 (m,
4H). MALDI-TOF: m/z 1040.3414, calcd 1040.3502. UV-vis,
toluene, λmax nm (relative intensity): 475 (1.00), 558 (0.04), 599
(0.08), 641 (0.14), 718 (0.09).
Synthesis of the Pd(II) and Pt(II) Porphyrins. Pd1NF. An
excess of PdCl2(PhCN)2 (36.0 mg, 0.09 mmol, 2.0 equiv) was
added to a solution of porphyrin ligand 1NF (44.5 mg, 0.05
mmol, 1.0 equiv) in THF (20 mL), and the mixture was refluxed
for 15 min. N,N-dimethyldiisopropylamine (20 μL) was added
as a base, and the mixture was refluxed for an additional 15 min.
The conversion was monitored by UV-vis spectroscopy
(solvent: toluene). DDQ (106.0 mg, 0.47 mmol, 10 equiv) was
added, and the mixture was refluxed for 15 min. The oxidation
was monitored by UV-vis spectroscopy (solvent toluene). The
solvent volume was reduced to 20 mL under vacuum conditions.
CH2Cl2 (100 mL) was added, and the mixture was washed with
aqueous 10% Na2SO3. The organic phase was dried over
Na2SO4, and the solvent was evaporated. The crude product
was purified by column chromatography on Al2O3 (removal of
excess DDQ, eluent: n-hexane/toluene = 2:1 (v/v); elution of
Pd1NF, eluent: toluene). Final purification was accomplished
€
€
€
(26) Ahlrichs, R.; Bar, M.; Haser, M.; Horn, H.; Kolmel, C. Chem. Phys.
(accessed Sept 2010).
(27) (a) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. (b) Stephens,
P. J.; Devlin, F. J.; Chabalowski, C. F.; Frisch, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98,
11623–11627.
€
(28) Schafer, A.; Horn, H.; Ahlrichs, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 2571–
2577.
(29) Weigend, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 3297–
3305.
(30) Schafer, A.; Huber, C.; Ahlrichs, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 5829–
5835.
€