Among the various fluorophore core structures, the naph-
thalimide class of dyes hold particular interest because of
their exceptional brightness and potential for two-color
emission.4 Considering the dramatically different photophys-
ics between the C10H8 isomers azulene and naphthalene,5 a
key hypothesis we sought to examine with our so-called
“seesaw model” invokes the use of symmetry as a predictive
tool in generating new DF dyes.5b Specifically, we sought
to compare fluorescence properties of N-aryl-2,3-naphthalic
anhydride (2,3-NI) systems relative to isomeric 1,8-NI (which
the model was originally based upon). The 5-membered
imide ring of 2,3-NI imposes a different steric environment
and rotational dynamics than the 6-membered imide ring of
1,8-NI. Therefore, to test our excited state model on the basis
of the point group (C2V) common to both isomers of NI, we
designed a ten element marix of novel 5- and 6-
substituted-(2,3)-naphthalimides.
To generate 2,3-naphthalic anhydrides, the inherent an-
hydride functionality requires an electron-deficient dienophile
such as maleic anhydride or dialkyl maleate and therefore
restricts electron-deficient dienes from participating.6 On the
basis of the general synthetic approach for these systems with
maleic anhydride as the de facto dienophile, syntheses
involving only electron-rich or neutral dienes have been
reported, thereby severely limiting their synthetic scope.7,8
To further complicate matters, our “seesaw” model requires
electron-withdrawing groups at the naphthalic ring to effect
DF.
For the appropriate placement of substituents at the 5- and
6-positions of 2,3-naphthalic anhydride, we report a synthetic
strategy where the pivotal step involves the use of 1-hy-
droxyphthalans. The general route to these various hemiac-
etals is outlined below in Scheme 1. From a practical
perspective, our efforts focused on developing a general route
to substituted 2,3-naphthalic anhydrides from common
substituted phthalic acids. In this procedure, analogues of
phthalic dicarboxylic acid were dehydrated in acetic anhy-
dride to give the corresponding anhydrides. Reduction of
these phthalic anhydrides with zinc and acetic acid yielded
two isomers, R and ꢀ (80:20, respectively).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Electron Deficient 1-Hydroxyphthalans
Supporting Information). In the case of 3-nitrophthalic
anhydride (compound 2 in the Supporting Information), the
carbonyl group of 3-nitrophthalic anhydride was reduced
selectively with NaBH4 at -23 °C, to yield 7-nitrophthalide
as the major product. In the case of 3-substituted phthalic
anhydride, reduction occurred at the ꢀ-carbonyl position and
the selective reduction could be due to the formation of
chelates.9 These chelates were formed by complexation of
an appropriate substituent (i.e., NO2, F, N) with zinc. The
resulting phthalides were reduced with DIBAL-H in dichlo-
romethane to give 1-hydroxyphthalans.
In Scheme 2, 1-hydroxyphthalans were used for these
unprecedented Diels-Alder reactions. The key step is
Diels-Alder addition of in situ generated isobenzofurans by
heating of 1-hydroxyphthalans in AcOH with maleic anhy-
dride for 12 h. Vacuum evaporation of the solvent afforded
a mixture of exo and endo isomers in essentially quantitative
yield (Table 2 in the Supporting Information). At refluxing
temperature, the exo product was highly favored and at low
temperature exo and endo products were formed in equal
amounts.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 5- and 6-Substituted-2,3-NI
Reduction occurred preferentially at the ꢀ-carbonyl func-
tion to give the corresponding phthalides as the major product
in 3- and 4-substituted phthalic anhydrides, which was
1
confirmed by H NMR and TLC analysis (Table 1 in the
(3) Briehn, C. A.; Schiedel, M.-S.; Bonsen, E. M.; Schuhman, W.;
Ba¨urle, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2001, 40, 4680–4683.
(4) (a) Cao, H.; Chang, V.; Hernandez, R.; Heagy, M. D. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 4929–4934. (b) Costi, M. P.; Rinaldi, M.; Tondi, D.; Pecorari,
P.; Barlocco, D.; Ghelli, S.; Stroud, R. M.; Santi, V. D.; Stout, J. T.; Musiu,
C.; Marangiu, M. E.; Pani, A.; Congiu, D.; Loi, A. G.; La Colla, P. J. Med.
Chem. 1999, 4, 2112–2124.
(5) (a) Liu., R. H. S.; Muthyala, R. S.; Wang, X. S.; Asato, A. E.; Wang,
P.; Ye, C. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 269–271. (b) Nandhikonda, P.; Begaye, P. M.;
Cao, Z.; Heagy, M. D. Chem. Commun. 2009, 4941–4943.
On the basis of these observations, the exo isomer is
assigned as the thermodynamic product and the endo product
as the kinetically favored product. Recognizing this isomer
assignment contradicts Alder’s endo rule, the exo isomer was
(6) (a) Saito, I. Pure Appl. Chem. 1992, 64, 1305. (b) Kirsheubaum,
M. R.; Chen, S. F.; Behrens, C. H.; Papp, L. M.; Stafford, M. M.; Sun,
J. H.; Behrens, D. L.; Fredricks, J. R.; Polkus, S. T.; Sipple, P.; Patten,
A. D.; Dexter, D.; Seitz, S. P.; Gross, J. L. Cancer Res. 1994, 54, 2199.
(7) (a) Vazquez, M. E.; Blanco, J. B.; Imperiali, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 1300–1306. (b) Sundd, M.; Robertson, A. D. Nat. Struct. Biol.
1
confirmed by H-1H NMR coupling. Similar results were
2002, 9, 500–501
(8) Gawronski, J.; Gawronska, K.; Brzostowska, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 1191–1194
.
.
(9) Kayser, M. M.; Morand, P. Can. J. Chem. 1980, 58, 2484–2490.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 21, 2010
4797