Z. Fejes et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 4968–4971
4971
In contrast, carrying out theoretical calculations on flavofungin
itself shows a somewhat different picture since in this case the pre-
dicted regioselectivity showed method dependency. However,
applying the ab initio HF/6-31G method as an ‘intermediate’ level
of theory for the polyenoic acid part in ONIOM calculations was
sufficient to predict the experimentally observed regioselectivity.
In the case of natamycin the theoretical calculations demon-
strated that the rod-shaped conformation of the antibiotic was de-
formed as a consequence of the DA reaction, leading to a more
compact conformation of 4. The elongated shape is probably neces-
sary for a sterol complex formation, which might explain the loss
of the antifungal activity of 4 compared to the parent compound 1.
Software packages used in this work: The AMBER software
package6 was used for empirical force-field calculations while
quantum chemistry calculations were carried out using either MO-
PAC11 or GAUSSIAN’0312 suites. The conformers were classified into
clusters using in-house software.13 The MOLEKEL14 software package
was used for visualization of the results.
Figure 4. B3LYP/6-31G(D) transition state for the Diels–Alder reaction between a
pentaene carboxylic acid (flavofungin model) and 3.
and for all but the MP2/6-31G(d) levels of theory applied. At the
MP2/6-31G(d) level the TSs involving the Cx-5–Cx-4–Cx-3–Cx-
2 atoms were systematically the most stable one. Even though
the B3LYP method was shown to be remarkably successful for peri-
cyclic reactions,3,10 additional series of calculations were carried
out in order to resolve the discrepancy in the predicted (by means
MP2 versus other dependable methods) DA regioselectivity. Model
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Hungarian National Infrastruc-
ture Development Program (Grant: NIIF 1116) and the Hungarian
Scientific Research Funds (Grants: OTKA 68578, NKTH-OTKA CK
77515, TÁMOP-4.2.2-08/1/2008-0019, TÁMOP 4.2.1./B-09/1/
KONV-2010-0007 and OTKA 79126). We are grateful for the help-
ful discussions with Professor László Szilágyi in the field of NMR
assignments.
reactions between the Me-substituted (at the
x position relative to
the carboxyl group) polyenoic acids and 3 at ONIOM(MP2/6-
31G(d):HF/6-31G) level prefer again a DA reaction involving the
atoms of the farthest cisoid conformation from the carboxyl group.
Since the x-Me-substituted model is expected to mirror the proper-
ties of flavofungin in a greater extent, the results of calculations are
in a nice agreement with our experiments where the product corre-
sponding to this adduct (a ‘substituted pentaenoic acid’) was ob-
tained exclusively. It is also worth mentioning that this transition
state corresponds to a rather asynchronous reaction step since the
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
bond between C
formation of the C
x
and the N of the dienophile precedes the
x
References and notes
-3–N bond, like those observed by Turner3
et al. from their theoretical calculations on symmetric polyenes
(Fig. 4). Attaching the –CH2–CH2–OH group to the other end of the
polyene (triene) chain resulted qualitatively in the same findings.
Energies for each of these transition states calculated at various
levels of theory can be found in Table S10 while the graphical rep-
resentations of the corresponding structures are given in Figures
S22–S39. It should be noted that using frontier MO coefficients
to predict the regioselectivity of the DA reaction seems to work
for trienoic and tetraenoic acids while it frequently fails (depend-
ing on the applied method) for the pentaenoic acid. The predicting
power of MO coefficients on the directing effect can be even more
doubtful in the trienoic acid case when the –CH2–CH2–OH substi-
1. Omura, S.; Tanaka, H. In Macrolide Antibiotics: Chemistry, Biology and Practice;
Omura, S., Ed.; Academic press: New York, 1984; pp 341–404.
2. Silberstein, A. J. Membr. Biol. 1998, 162, 117–126.
3. Turner, C. I.; Paddon-Row, M. N.; Willis, A. C.; Sherburn, M. S. J. Org. Chem. 2005,
70, 1154–1163.
4. Raab, W. Arzneim. Forsch. 1967, 17, 538–543.
5. Volpon, L.; Lancelin, J.-M. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 4533–4541.
6. (a) Wang, J.; Wolf, R. M.; Caldwell, J. W.; Kollamn, P. A.; Case, D. A. J. Comput.
Chem. 2004, 25, 1157–1174; (b) Case, D. A.; Cheatham, T.; Darden, T.; Gohlke,
H.; Luo, R.; Merz, K. M., Jr.; Onufriev, A.; Simmerling, C.; Wang, B.; Woods, R. J.
Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1668–1688.
7. Uri, J.; Békési, I. Nature 1958, 181, 908–909.
8. Szilágyi, L.; Sándor, P. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1990, 28, 963–972.
9. Yamada, S.; Hamano, K.; Shimizu, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2379–2382.
10. Wiest, O.; Montiel, D. C.; Houk, K. N. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 8378–8388.
11. Stewart, J. P. P. MOPAC 2007, 2007, Stewart Computational Chemistry (SCC),
Paddington Circle Colorado Springs, CO 80921, USA.
tuent is at the
x position. Demonstrative MO coefficients and
eigenvalues are listed in Tables S8 and S9.
12. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.;
Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, Jr., J. A.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.;
Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.;
Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.;
Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao,
O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken,
V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A.
J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G.
A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.;
Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.;
Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.;
Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.;
Fox, D. J. ; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe,
M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A.
GAUSSIAN 03, Revision C.02, Gaussian Inc., Wallingford CT, 2004.
In conclusion, the DA reactions at compounds 1 and 2 have been
carried out and the obtained products were characterized experi-
mentally. The theoretical calculations demonstrated that despite
the cyclic structures of 1 and 2, the flexibility of these molecules
allows the presence of the cisoid conformation at any position of
the polyene unit of the macrocycles.
In the case of the natamycin theoretical model, all the applied
quantum chemical methods supported the same regioselectivity
preference in perfect agreement with the experimental findings
despite the missing bulky sugar group. The applied semiempirical
and ab initio quantum chemical calculations on polyenoic acids (as
models of the flavofungin polyene chain) also predict a product in
agreement with the experiments. From these facts we favor a
mainly electronic nature of the observed DA regioselectivity.
13. Mándi, A. unpublished work.
14. Flükiger, P.; Lüthi, H. P.; Portmann, S.; Weber, J. MOLEKEL 5.4., 2000–2002, Swiss
Center for Scientific Computing, Manno, Switzerland.