10.1002/ejoc.201700373
European Journal of Organic Chemistry
COMMUNICATION
[4]
a) V. Gudipati, D. P. Curran, Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 2254; b) K.
Zhang, V. Gudipati, D. P. Curran, Synlett 2010, 667; c) V. Gudipati, R.
BajPai, D. P. Curran, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 2009, 74, 771;
d) K. Zhang, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh, 2011.
Chen, H. M. Gau, Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 2223; b) Enantiomerically
pure (R)-3 was obtained by recrystallization of (R)-1, desilylation under
acidic conditions (TsOH, MeOH), and silylation with TBDPSCl and
imidazole (see Supporting Information).
[5]
[6]
a) T. Itoh, T. P. Montgomery, A. Recio III, M. J. Krische, Org. Lett. 2014,
16, 820; b) E. T. T. Kumpulainen, B. Kang, M. J. Krische, Org. Lett.
2011, 13, 2484.
[13] R. Chenevert, M. Dasser, J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4529.
[14] Review: P. R. Blakemore, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 2563.
[15] a) The combination of KHMDS and THF afforded lower selectivity (E/Z
78:22); b) The E/Z ratios were measured by 1H NMR integrations
before and after purification and confirmed by GC-HRMS (see
Supporting Information); c) These E/Z isomers were not easily
separable, but anticipating saturation later in the sequence, the reaction
was not optimized further.
a) P. Nuhant, W. R. Roush, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 5340; b) J.
Kister, P. Nuhant, R. Lira, A. Sorg, W. R. Roush, Org. Lett. 2011, 13,
1868; c) P. Nuhant, J. Kister, R. Lira, A. Sorg, W. R. Roush,
Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 6497; d) R. Lira, W. R. Roush, Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
533.
[7]
[8]
G. K. Friestad, G. Sreenilayam, Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5016.
[16] Retention of configuration in α-silyloxy aldehydes: (a) M. Hayashi, T.
Yoshiga, K. Nakatani, K. Ono, N. Oguni, Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 2821;
b) D. Enders, A. Plant, D. Backhaus, U. Reinhold, Tetrahedron 1995,
51, 10699; c) Also see ref. 7.
a) Review of 1,5-polyols: G. K. Friestad, G. Sreenilayam, Pure Appl.
Chem. 2011, 83, 461. Also see: (b) Y. Yang, G. He, R. Yin, L. Zhu, X.
Wang, R. Hong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 11600; c) P. R.
Hanson, S. Jayasinghe, S. Maitra, C. N. Ndi, R. Chegondi, Beilstein J.
Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 2332; d) D. De Joarder, M. P. Jennings,
Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 5826; e) P. Sawant, M. E. Maier, Synlett
2011, 3002; f) R. Matsui, K. Seto, Y. Sato, T. Suzuki, A. Nakazaki, S.
Kobayashi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 680.
[17] Diastereomers were evident in 1H and 13C NMR spectra after the next
Julia–Kocienski coupling (see Supporting Information).
[18] Isomer ratios were measured by 1H NMR integrations. No minor (Z,E)-
or (Z,Z)-isomers were observed in 1H and 13C NMR spectra.
[19] N. Toda, S. Asano, C. F. Barbas III, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52,
12592.
[9]
Review: S. E. Bode, M. Wolberg, M. Muller, Synthesis 2006, 557.
[10] a) C.-L. Shao, R. G. Linington, M. J. Balunas, A. Centeno, P. Boudreau,
C. Zhang, N. Engene, C. Spadafora, T. S. Mutka, D. E. Kyle, L.
Gerwick, C.-Y. Wang, W. H. Gerwick, J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 7849; b)
H. C. Kwon, C. A. Kauffman, P. R. Jensen, W. Fenical, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 1622.
[20] No (S,S)-diastereomer peaks were observed by 1H and 13C NMR.
[21] E. J. Corey, N. W. Gilman, B. E. Ganem, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90,
5616.
[22] a) See ref. 11; b) When KOt-Bu used as the base instead of KHMDS,
the product formed in 17% yield with 58% recovered starting material;
c) No evidence of anti-1,3 diastereomer was observed in 1H and 13C
NMR spectra.
[11] D. A. Evans, J. A. Gauchet-Prunet, J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2446.
[12] a) Asymmetric cyanation to form (R)-2 in the prior report (ref. 7) was of
slightly lower selectivity (83–86%ee). The improvement noted herein
may be attributed to better temperature control via slow addition, and to
differences in the amount of HCN present in the TMSCN reagent. For
precedent, see F. Yang, S. Wei, P. Xi, L. Yang, J. Lan, J. You, C. A.
[23] a) Peak assignments confirmed by 1H–1H COSY NMR; b) See ref. 11.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.