6066
R. C. Yanagita et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 6064–6066
Acknowledgments
This work was partly supported by The Naito Foundation and
The Uehara Memorial Foundation (K.I.), and by a Grant-in-aid for
Scientific Research (A) (No.21248015) (K.I.) and a Grant-in-aid for
JSPS Fellows (No. 20Á4135) (R.C.Y.) from The Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. Finally, we thank
the Screening Committee of Anticancer Drugs supported by a
Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research on the Priority Area ‘Cancer’
from The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Tech-
nology, Japan.
Supplementary data
Figure 2. EBV-EA-inducing ability of TPA, ATX, bryo-1, 1, and 3. Percentages of
EA-positive cells are shown. Sodium n-butyrate (4 mM) was added to all samples to
enhance the sensitivity of Raji cells. Only 0.1% EA-induction was demonstrated at
4 mM. The final concentration of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was 0.4%. Cell viability
exceeded 60% in each experiment except for ATX (50%). Error bars represent
standard errors of the mean (n = 3).
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Nishizuka, Y. Nature 1984, 308, 693.
2. Nishizuka, Y. FASEB J. 1995, 9, 484.
3. Newton, A. C. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 28495.
4. Hecker, E. Naturwissenschaften 1967, 54, 282.
TPA and teleocidin B-4 induced maximal EA induction (ca. 30%) at
10À7–10À8 M.24,25 Quite similar induction was observed at 10À6
M
5. (a) Nakata, H.; Harada, H.; Hirata, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 23, 2515; (b) Fujiki,
H.; Sugimura, T. Adv. Cancer Res. 1987, 49, 223.
6. Kato, Y.; Scheuer, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 2245.
7. Pettit, G. R.; Herald, C. L.; Doubek, D. L.; Herald, D. L.; Arnold, E.; Clardy, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6846.
8. Hennings, H.; Blumberg, P. M.; Pettit, G. R.; Herald, C. L.; Shores, R.; Yuspa, S. H.
Carcinogenesis 1987, 8, 1343.
9. Gschwendt, M.; Fürstenberger, G.; Rose-John, S.; Rogers, M.; Kittstein, W.;
Pettit, G. R.; Herald, C. L.; Marks, F. Carcinogenesis 1988, 9, 555.
10. Hale, K. J.; Hummersone, M. G.; Manaviazar, S.; Frigerio, M. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002,
19, 413.
(Supplementary data). TPA and ATX showed strong (28.8% and
18.4%) EA-inducing ability at 10À7 M, while bryo-1 with little
tumor-promoting activity at the same concentration showed weak
induction (1.4%) and suppressed the EA-induction by TPA signifi-
cantly (6.8%). In the case of the simplified ATX analogues, 3 showed
weak EA-inducing ability (9.7%), which was equivalent to that of 1
(9.4%). However, the ability of 3 to suppress the EA-induction by
TPA (15.2%) was lower than that of 1 (10.1%). These results suggest
that the phenolic hydroxyl group at position 18 of 1 plays an
important role in the anti-tumor-promoting ability rather than in
the antiproliferative activity in vitro.
11. Sun, M. K.; Alkon, D. L. CNS Drug Rev. 2006, 12, 1.
12. Szallasi, Z.; Krsmanovic, L.; Blumberg, P. M. Cancer Res. 1993, 53, 2507.
13. Szallasi, Z.; Blumberg, P. M. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 5355.
14. Czerniecki, B.; Gad, S. C.; Reilly, C.; Smith, A. C.; Witz, G. Carcinogenesis 1986, 7,
1637.
15. Moore, R. E. In Cellular Interactions by Environmental Tumor Promoters; Fujiki,
H., Hecker, E., Moore, R. E., Sugimura, T., Weinstein, I. B., Eds.; Japan Scientific
Society Press/VNU Science Press: Tokyo/Utrecht, 1984; pp 49–57.
16. Fujiki, H.; Sugimura, T.. In Cancer Survey; Slaga, T. J., Montesano, R., Eds.; Oxford
University Press: London, 1984; Vol. 2, pp 539–556.
Not only PKCd but also other PKC isozymes (PKCs) play important
physiological roles, for example, Raji cells express PKCa, bII, and d
isozymes.26,27 To investigate the mode of action of the ATX ana-
logues, PKC isozyme selectivity of ATX and its analogues were exam-
ined using the synthetic PKC C1 peptides. Recent investigation
suggested that C1A domains in conventional PKCs and C1B domains
in novel PKCs play critical roles in the activation of PKCs by the PKC
activators.19,28 The affinities were, thus, measured by the C1A pep-
tides of conventional PKCs and the C1B peptides of novel PKCs. The
results are summarized in Table 1. While ATX showed little selectiv-
ity between conventional and novel PKCs like PDBu,28 affinities of
1–3 for novel PKCs were about ten times higher than those for
conventional PKC. Given that the affinity and the selectivity for
PKC isozymes of 3 were comparable to those of 1, these results also
suggest an unknown receptor of 1 other than PKCs to be responsible
for the anti-tumor-promoting ability of 1.
17. Nakagawa, Y.; Yanagita, R. C.; Hamada, N.; Murakami, A.; Takahashi, H.; Saito,
N.; Nagai, H.; Irie, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7573.
18. Compound 3: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, 0.022 M, 296 K) d 0.86 (3H, s), 0.98 (3H,
s), 1.34–1.69 (13H, m), 2.21 (1H, t, J = 6.0 Hz), 2.40 (1H, dd, J = 13.1, 10.8 Hz),
2.49 (1H, d, J = 15.6 Hz), 2.53 (1H, dd, J = 13.1, 2.7 Hz), 2.62 (2H, t, J = 7.8 Hz),
2.70 (1H, dd, J = 16.7, 3.4 Hz), 2.80 (1H, dd, J = 16.7, 11.5 Hz), 3.70 (1H, quintet,
J = 5.7 Hz), 3.77 (1H, ddd, J = 12.0, 5.7, 4.0 Hz), 3.88 (1H, m), 4.17 (1H, m), 5.18
(1H, m), 5.20 (1H, m), 7.15–7.26 (3H, m), 7.27–7.29 (2H, m) ppm; 13C NMR
(125 MHz, CDCl3, 0.022 M, 297 K) d 21.19, 24.77, 25.13, 25.93, 27.25, 31.28,
34.54, 34.72, 35.52, 35.93, 36.87, 36.98, 42.69, 63.72, 64.43, 68.77, 70.57, 71.74,
100.20, 125.52, 128.19 (2C), 128.44 (2C), 142.91, 169.60, 171.51 ppm; HR-FAB-
MS m/z 475.2700 ([M+H]+). Calcd for C27H39O7 475.2696; [
CHCl3, 22.7 °C).
19. Irie, K.; Oie, K.; Nakahara, A.; Yanai, Y.; Ohigashi, H.; Wender, P. A.; Fukuda, H.;
Konishi, H.; Kikkawa, U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9159.
20. Nakamura, H.; Kishi, Y.; Pajares, M. A.; Rando, R. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1989, 86, 9672.
21. Yamori, T. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2003, 52, S74.
22. Wender, P. A.; Baryza, J. L.; Bennett, C. E.; Bi, F. C.; Brenner, S. E.; Clarke, M. O.;
Horan, J. C.; Kan, C.; Lacôte, E.; Lippa, B.; Nell, P. G.; Turner, T. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 13648.
23. Ito, Y.; Yanase, S.; Fujita, J.; Harayama, T.; Takashima, M.; Imanaka, H. Cancer
Lett. 1981, 13, 29.
24. Irie, K.; Nakahara, A.; Ikawa, Y.; Tanaka, M.; Nakagawa, Y.; Nakamura, Y.;
Ohigashi, H.; Wender, P. A. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000, 64, 2429.
25. Irie, K.; Isaka, T.; Iwata, Y.; Yanai, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Koizumi, F.; Ohigashi, H.;
Wender, P. A.; Satomi, Y.; Nishino, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10733.
26. Setterblad, N.; Onyango, I.; Pihlgren, U.; Rask, L.; Andersson, G. J. Immunol.
1998, 161, 4819.
27. Kamimura, K.; Hojo, H.; Abe, M. Pathol. Int. 2004, 54, 224.
28. Shindo, M.; Irie, K.; Nakahara, A.; Ohigashi, H.; Konishi, H.; Kikkawa, U.;
Fukuda, H.; Wender, P. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 2073.
a] +41 (c 0.218,
D
In summary, we synthesized the 18-deoxy derivative (3) of a sim-
plified analogue of ATX (1) to investigate the effect of the phenolic
hydroxyl group at position 18 on the affinity for PKCd, antiprolifera-
tive activity in 39 human cancer cell lines, and tumor-promoting/
anti-tumor-promoting activity in vitro. Although 1 and 3 were al-
most the same in terms of binding to PKC isozymes including PKCd,
PKC isozyme selectivity, and antiproliferative activity, they differed
significantly in the EBV-EA induction test with 3 showing less anti-
tumor-promoting activity than 1. The present results indicate that
the phenolic hydroxyl group at position 18 is not involved in the
antiproliferative activity of 1 in vitro. This means that the phenolic
hydroxyl group would be available as a tunable site to develop supe-
rior analogues and molecular probes for analyzing the mechanism of
the antiproliferative and anti-tumor-promoting activity of 1.