.
Angewandte
Communications
with a yield of 90% upon isolation. This result
suggested that 3a is thermodynamically more
stable than 2a. The compound 3a was stable
enough to be re-isolated without any sign of
decomposition after being heated in the temper-
ature range of 23–908C in various solvents. In
contrast, 3b, bearing only isopropyl groups, did not
enjoy this increased stability when converted from
2b. Unlike 3a, the isolated 3b was slowly converted
back into 2b when heated at 308C in [D8]1,4-
dioxane or CDCl3. The system eventually reached
an equilibrium with a trans/cis ratio of 3:7. There-
fore, it is likely that CH–p interactions play a role in
stabilizing the cis isomer 3a.
Figure 1. Molecular structure of 3a.
conversion from 2a into 3a. The data suggested that the
methyl groups in 3a are no longer magnetically equivalent
because one methyl group experiences a strong shielding
effect.[9] With the help of X-ray crystallographic data, we
assumed that the close proximity of one of the methyl groups
to the isopropyl unit and the phenyl ring in 3a led to this
splitting. The electron density of the phenyl group shields the
protons on this methyl group when the methyl group rests
above the plane of the phenyl ring.
Nishio and co-workers have done database studies of CH–
p interactions since 1970s.[9a,10] They devised a set of methods
to prove the existence of CH–p interactions, as shown in
Figure S2 in the Supporting Information. Following the
Nishio method,[11] we measured the dihedral angles and
distances da, dp, d1, b, and a from the crystal structure of 3a.
Both the dihedral angles and distances of 3a (Table 1) were
The convincing proof of the existence of CH–p interac-
tions within NHC-based palladium complexes prompted us to
investigate the correlation between the electron density on
the phenyl ring and the extent of stabilization caused by CH–
p interaction. The compounds 2c, 2d, and 2e were isomerized
to form 3c, 3d and 3e, respectively, at room temperature in
CDCl3.[8] From the dihedral angle and distance data (Table 1),
it can be shown that CH–p interactions occurred in 3c and 3d.
Notably, 3d had dp distances of 2.664 and 2.626 ꢀ, whereas 3c
had dp distances of 2.750 and 2.687 ꢀ, thus suggesting that the
electronic property of the p system influences the strength of
the CH–p interaction.[10f,12] The electron-donating methoxy
group increases the electron density on the phenyl ring in 3d,
thereby resulting in a stronger CH–p interaction than those
brought about by the electron-withdrawing fluoro group in
3c. We also replaced X ligands with
bromides to see whether the CH–p
interaction still exists. The initially
Table 1: Dihedral angles and distances for cis-[(NHC)2PdX2] complexes.[a]
Complex
CH/p
da [ꢀ]
dp [ꢀ] dl [ꢀ]
b [8]
a [8]
synthesized trans isomer 2h was
successfully transformed into the
cis-anti isomer 3h, the CH–p inter-
action of which was observed in the
X-ray crystal structure (Table 1).
An interesting result was
achieved in the conversion of 2e
into 3e. The strong electronegativ-
3a: R1 =iPr,
R2 =Ph
CH15c/PlC8,9
CH4c/PlC19,20
CH18a/PlC8,9
CH5a/PlC20,21
2.812 2.757 2.787 30.36 81.29
2.861 2.817 2.845 33.60 81.67
2.920 2.750 2.845 26.97 75.61
2.827 2.687 2.757 23.54 76.99
3c: R1 =iPr,
R2 =4-FC6H4
3d: R1 =iPr,
R2 =4-MeOC6H4
CH13a/PlC20,21 2.849 2.664 2.799 31.05 72.10
cis-[(NHC)2PdI2]
CH26a/PlC7,6
2.911 2.626 2.829 42.78 68.19
2.784 2.691 2.756 4.06 77.90
2.714 2.613 2.651 22.52 80.34
2.683 2.527 2.626 16.01 73.97
2.945 2.767 2.883 32.11 73.74
2.472 2.939 2.694 29.70 71.77
3e: R1 =iPr, R2 =C6F5 CF10/PlC8,9
3 f: R1 =Ph,
R2 =Ph
CH15/PlC25,26
CH18/PlC2,3
CH13b/PlC8,9
CH2b/PlC19,20
ity of fluorine gives rise to five Cd+
F
À
3g: R1 =Ph,
R2 =Et
dÀ bond dipoles in the phenyl ring
of 3e. This feature renders the
center of the phenyl ring electro-
positive, as opposed to the electro-
negative phenyl ring in 3a. The
À
3h: R1 =iPr,
R2 =Ph
CH24a/PlC7,8
2.957 2.729 2.899 31.83 70.32
cis-[(NHC)2PdBr2]
CH12a/PlC17,18 3.059 2.831 2.994 30.59 71.05
[a] a: dihedral angle between plane C1OC2 and plane HC1C2; b: ]HCxC1; dp: distance of H/p plane
(H/I); dl: distance of H/line C1-C2 (H/J); da: distance of HC1 (C1 is the nearest carbon atom to H).
CdÀ
H
d+ bond dipoles thus disfavor
the interaction with the electron-
deficient C6F5 p system in 3e. In
dÀ
contrast, the Cd+
bond dipoles
À
F
consistent with our conjecture. The data showed that C4H and
C15H, belonging to the CH3 of the iPr group, were in Ra 1 of
the C8,C9 and C19,C20 p-system planes (Figure 1). Thus, we
concluded that there exist CH–p interactions between the
C4H, C15H, and C19,20, C8,C9 phenyl planes in 3a.
favorably interact with the C6F5 center (see Figure S3).[13] This
explains why 3e adopts the cis-syn configuration rather than
the cis-anti configuration (Figure 2). The compound 3e had
a dp value of 2.691 ꢀ, which is shorter than the values of 2.757/
2.817 ꢀ for 3a. This CF–p interaction is further supported by
19F NMR spectroscopic data. Ortho fluorine substituents,
which participate in the CF–p interactions, experience
a deshielding anisotropic effect because of the close proximity
with an electropositive pentafluorophenyl ring, while meta
To further check the stability of the cis isomer, compound
2a was heated in CDCl3 at 558C for 12 days (see Figure S1).
1
By monitoring the reaction with H NMR spectroscopy, we
observed that 2a was fully converted into the cis isomer 3a
2
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!