6698
S. Asano et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 6696–6698
Table 3
Kinase selectivity
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
Compd
CaMKII
Kinase selectivity
IC50 M)
a
IC50
(l
M)
(l
CaMKIV
MLCK
p38a
Akt1
PKC
2
8j
8p
11
0.16
0.063
Ntb
>60
>60
51
0.90
36
Ntb
11
11
Ntb
8.5
30
Ntb
22
21
a
Compounds inhibitory activity for CaMKII enzyme.
Nt: not tested.
b
Supplementary data
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
[CaM] (nM)
Figure 2. Michaelis–Menten plot of CaMKII inhibition by various concentrations
(0 (d), 62.5 (s), 125 (.), 250 (5) M) of compound 8j. The inhibition kinetics
l
References and notes
analysis of CaMKII by compound 8j were performed SigmaPlot Enzyme Kinetic
Module. We calculated the goodness of fit to the enzyme inhibition model of
competitive, non-competitive, and un-competitive following equations V = Vmax/
{1 + (Km/S)(1 + I/Ki)}, V = Vmax/(1 + Km/S)(1 + I/Ki), and V = Vmax/(1 + I/Ki + Km/S),
respectively (Vmax: the maximum velocity. Km: Michaelis constant for the varied
substrate. S: concentration of the varied substrate. I: concentration of the test
substance. Ki: inhibition constant.). The coefficient of determination of non-
competitive was best and Ki value of 8j was calculated with 930 nM.
1. (a) Bootman, M. D.; Collins, T. J.; Peppiatt, C. M.; Prothero, L. S.; MacKenzie, L.;
De Smet, P.; Travers, M.; Tovey, S. C.; Seo, J. T.; Berridge, M. J.; Ciccolini, F.; Lipp,
P. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2001, 12, 3; (b) Howe, C. J.; Lahair, M. M.; Mccubrey, J. A.;
Franklin, R. A. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 44573.
2. (a) Hook, S. S. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2001, 41, 471; (b) Braun, A. P.;
Schulman, H. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1995, 57, 417.
3. (a) Hanson, P. I.; Schulman, H. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1992, 61, 559; (b) Colbran, R.
J.; Soderling, T. R. Curr. Top. Cell. Regul. 1990, 31, 181; (c) Gaertner, T. R.;
Kolodziej, S. J.; Wang, D.; Kobayashi, R.; Koomen, J. M.; Stoops, J. K.; Waxham,
M. N. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 12484.
4. (a) Schworer, C. M.; Colbran, R. J.; Keefer, J. R.; Soderling, T. R. J. Biol. Chem.
1988, 263, 13486; (b) Miller, S. G.; Patton, B. L.; Kennedy, M. B. Neuron 1988, 1,
593; (c) Thiel, G.; Czernik, A. J.; Gorelick, F.; Nairn, A. C.; Greengard, P. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. 1988, 85, 6337; (d) Ikeda, A.; Okuno, S.; Fujisawa, H. J. Biol. Chem.
1991, 266, 11582.
5. Meyer, T.; Hanson, P. I.; Stryer, L.; Schulman, H. Science 1992, 256, 1199.
6. Wayman, G. A.; Lee, Y. S.; Tokumitsu, H.; Silva, A.; Soderling, T. R. Neuron 2008,
59, 914.
7. Ang, E. S.; Zhang, P.; Steer, J. H.; Tan, J. W.; Yip, K.; Zheng, M. H.; Joyce, D. A.; Xu,
J. J. Cell. Physiol. 2007, 212, 787.
8. Lin, M. Y.; Zal, T.; Ch’en, I. L.; Gascoigne, N. R. J.; Hedrick, S. M. J. Immunol. 2005,
174, 5583.
9. Sumi, M.; Kiuchi, K.; Ishikawa, T.; Ishii, A.; Hagiwara, M.; Nagatsu, T.; Hidaka, H.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1991, 181, 968.
Michaelis–Menten plot indicated that 8j was a typical non-com-
petitive inhibitor (Fig. 2) with Ki value calculated using analysis
software as 926 nM.14 This finding indicates that our compounds
can be considered as calmodulin non-competitive inhibitors. Inter-
estingly, compounds 1 and 8j displayed different inhibition pat-
terns in spite of their structural similarities (aryl-sulfonamide
moiety). We speculate that the aminopyrimidine moiety in com-
pound 8j plays an important role in the inhibition pattern of CaM-
KII enzyme.
Finally, we examined the selectivity profile of 2, 8j, and 8p
against five types of kinase. The results are shown in Table 3. The
selectivity of the 2-naphtyl compound 8j against myosin light
chain kinase (MLCK), which belongs to the CaM kinase family,
was not good enough. Fortunately, compound 8p, the most potent
compound, showed significantly high selectivity against five off-
10. Ishida, A.; Kameshita, I.; Okuno, S.; Kitani, T.; Fujisawa, H. Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 1995, 212, 806.
11. A detailed description of the assay is provided in the Supplementary data.
12. (a) Sekiya, T.; Hiranuma, H.; Kanayama, T.; Hata, S. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1980, 15,
317; (b) Aratake, S.; Ueno, K.; Miki, I.; Iwase, M.; Muramatsu, K.; Yano, H. J.P.
Patent 162,673, 2005.
target kinases, CaMKIV, MLCK, p38a, Akt1, and PKC.
13. Compound 8p: mp 208–210 °C (dec); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) d 2.45 (3H,
s), 2.47–2.53 (2H, m), 2.64 (2H, m), 2.69 (2H, br t, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.10 (2H, m), 3.17
(2H, br s), 3.67 (2H, br s), 6.62 (1H, br s), 7.02 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.17 (2H, m),
7.21 (1H, m), 7.30 (2H, m), 7.24–7.37 (5H, m), 7.44 (1H, dd, J = 7.6, 1.0 Hz), 7.89
(1H, dd, J = 7.6, 1.0 Hz), 11.25 (1H, br s); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz) d 16.8,
26.2, 34.2, 41.3, 47.8, 49.1, 61.0, 104.7, 125.8, 126.7, 127.1, 127.9, 128.0, 128.3,
130.6, 132.8, 134.3, 138.0, 138.8, 145.6, 151.1, 162.1; IR (ATR) 3307, 1664,
1626 cmꢀ1. Anal. Calcd for C29H30ClN5O2S: C, 63.55; H, 5.52; N, 12.78; S, 5.85;
Cl, 6.47. Found: C, 63.20; H, 5.42; N, 12.55; S, 5.68; Cl, 6.29.
14. SigmaPlot for Windows Version 10.0.
In summary, we herein disclose a novel class of pyrimidine-
based CaMKII inhibitors. Key SAR as well as the synthetic methods
for these inhibitors are described. In particular, we found that com-
pound 8p inhibits CaMKII with an IC50 value of 0.063
substantially superior to that of the known CaMKII inhibitor 1
(IC50 = 1.0 M, Table 1). We therefore expect 8p to be a novel lead
lM, which is
l
compound in the development of treatments for inflammatory dis-
eases, including rheumatoid arthritis.