K. Ghosh et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 14 (2011) 489–492
491
Fig. 4. Gel electrophoresis separations showing the cleavage of supercoiled pBR322
DNA (100 ng) by complex 1. Incubated at 37 °C for 1.5 h. lane 1, DNA control; lane 2,
DNA+10% DMF; lanes 3–9, DNA+1=10, 25 40, 50, 60, 80, 100 μM respectively; lanes
10–14, DNA+1 (100 μM)+incubation time 5, 15, 30, 60 and 90 min respectively.
Fig. 6. Gel electrophoresis separations showing the cleavage of supercoiled pBR322
DNA (100 ng) by complex 1 (50 μM) in presence of radical scavengers (20 mM). lane 1,
DNA; lane 2, DNA+Cu(ClO4)2∙6H2O (100 μM); lane 3, DNA+1 (50 μM); lane 4–10,
DNA+1 (50 μM)+DMSO, ethanol, urea, catalase (1 U), D2O, L-histidine, NaN3,
respectively.
the amount of NC DNA was found to be increased with the increase in
concentration of 1 (10–100 μM) without the formation of LC form of
DNA. Second, enhancement of DNA cleavage activity was observed
due to variation of incubation time (Fig. 4, lane 10–14).
that complex 1 generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) which were
responsible for nuclease activity. Hence we found that 1 is a novel
example of a copper complex by which nuclease activity happened via
self-activation and to the best of our knowledge the single example of
such type of DNA cleaving agent available in the literature was by
Reedijk et al. [6]. However, our results derived from machenistic
investigation was not similar to the data reported by Reedijk and
coworkers.
In conclusion, mononuclear copper(II) complex [Cu(Pyimpy)(Cl)
(ClO4)] (1) derived from tridentate ligand Pyimpy has been
synthesized and characterized. Molecular structure of complex 1
was determined by X-ray crystallography. DNA interaction by
absorption spectral studies showed formation of a new species during
interaction. This molecule exhibited nuclease activity in absence of
any oxidizing or reducing agents. The cleavage efficiency was
dependent both on the complex concentration and on the incubation
period. Inhibition of nuclease activity was observed in the presence of
radical scavengers and possible role of reactive oxygen species was
speculated. Details of mechanistic investigation on this interesting
activity of this complex, bilogical activity studies and reactivity studies
on other related complexes are currently in progress.
In this next experiment depicted in Fig. 5, we examined the DNA
cleavage activity in presence of oxidizing or reducing agent. Nuclease
activity of 1 in presence of H2O2 or 2-mercaptoethanol (BME)
increased the cleavage activity as compared to the previous
experiment done by complex itself. Moreover, it has been found out
that in the presence of H2O2 or 2-mercaptoethanol 50 μM concentra-
tion of 1 showed the complete conversion of SC form to NC and LC
form of DNA (Fig. 5, lane 7, 8). The results of our control experiment
were described in Fig. S4. These data clealy indicated that Pyimpy
itself was not responsible for DNA cleavage activity.
Investigation of the mechanism becomes very much important
when copper complexes exhibit nuclease activity in absence of any
external reagents. There are several reports in the literature where
such type of activity was described, however, following reports will be
of our interest at this point. In certain reports authors explained such
type of DNA clevage activity via hydrolytic pathway because nuclease
activity was not inhibited by radical scavengers [7]. Later on religation
experiment was examined to prove hydrolytic cleavage. If nuclease
activity was inhibited by the presence of radical scavengers we could
speculate the possible role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in
nuclease activity. Hence we decided to perform first the investigation
of nuclease actvity in presence of radical scavengers (Fig. 6).
Involvement of reactive oxygen species (hydroxyl radical, super-
oxide ion, singlet oxygen and hydrogen peroxide) in nuclease activity
could be diagnosed by monitoring the quenching of DNA cleavage in
the presence of radical scavengers in solution [5]. The hydroxyl
radical scavengers like DMSO, ethanol and urea showed the complete
inhibition of nuclease activity (Fig. 6, lane 4–6). These results
suggested that hydroxyl radicals may be involved in the cleavage
process. Addition of singlet oxygen scavengers like L-histidine and
NaN3 (Fig. 6, lane 9,10) showed complete inhibition of nuclease. So
these results suggested that 1O2 or any other singlet oxygen-like
entity may participate in the DNA strand scission. However, we did
not observed enhancement of nuclease activity in presence of D2O
[18] (Fig. 6, lane 8). Probable participation of hydrogen peroxide was
excluded due to enhancement of nuclease activity upon addition of
catalase (Fig. 6, lane 7). On the basis of above observations we predict
Acknowledgments
KG is thankful to DST, New Delhi, India through the SERC FAST
Track project (SR/FTP/CS-44/2006) for financial support. PK and NT
are thankful to CSIR, India for financial assistance. We are thankful to
IITR for instrumental facilities. UPS is thankful to IIT Roorkee for single
crystal X-ray facility. We would like to thank Mr. Shibdas Banerjee for
his help.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
The experimental and crystal structure details are in supporting
information. The CCDC No. for [Cu(Pyimpy)(Cl)(ClO4)] is 773744. The
References
[1] (a) B. Armitage, Chem. Rev. 98 (1998) 1171;
(b) N. Farrell, Coord. Chem. Rev. 232 (2002) 1;
(c) H. Ali, J.E.V. Lier, Chem. Rev. 99 (1999) 2379;
(d) B. Meunier, Chem. Rev. 92 (1992) 1411.
[2] (a) W.K. Rgozelski, T.D. Tullius, Chem. Rev. 98 (1998) 1089;
(b) K.V.D. Schilden, F. Garcia, H. Kooijman, J.G. Haasnoot, A.L. Spek, J. Reedijk,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43 (2004) 5668.
[3] C. Tu, Y. Shao, N. Gan, Q. Xu, Z. Guo, Inorg. Chem. 43 (2004) 4761.
[4] D.S. Sigman, D.R. Graham, V. Daurora, A.M. Stern, J. Biol. Chem. 254 (1979) 12269.
[5] J. Chen, X. Wang, Y. Shao, J. Zhu, Y. Zhu, Y. Li, Q. Xu, Z. Guo, Inorg. Chem. 46 (2007)
3306.
[6] (a) P.U. Maheswari, S. Roy, H.D. Dulk, S. Barends, G.P.V. Wezel, B. Kozlevcar, P.
Gamez, J. Reedijk, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2006) 710;
(b) P.U. Maheswari, M.V.D. Ster, S. Smulders, S. Barends, G.P.V. Wezel, C. Massera,
S. Roy, H.D. Dulk, P. Gamez, J. Reedijk, Inorg. Chem. 47 (2008) 3719.
[7] (a) V. Rajendiran, R. Karthik, M. Palaniandavar, H.S. Evans, V.S. Periasamy, M.A.
Akbarsha, B.S. Srinag, H. Krishnamurthy, Inorg. Chem. 46 (2007) 8208;
Fig. 5. Gel electrophoresis separations showing the cleavage of supercoiled pBR322
DNA (100 ng) by complex 1 in presence of H2O2 and BME. Incubated at 37 °C for 1.5 h.
(a) lane 1, DNA control; lane 2, DNA+H2O2 (400 μM); lane 3, DNA+BME (400 μM);
lanes 4–6, DNA+1=25, 50, 100 μM; respectively, lane 7, DNA+1 (50 μM)+H2O2
(200 μM); lane 8, DNA+1 (50 μM)+BME (200 μM).