C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
an additive enhanced both reactivity and selectivity (entry 2).
However, diamine hydrochloride, (S,S)-3•HCl, and (S,S)-3•(HCl)2
lowered the enantioselectivity (entries 3-4). Notably, amino Tf-
amide catalysts of type (S,S)-1 and (S,S)-4 totally lost the enanti-
oselection (entries 5-6). Additional optimizations with regard to
additives led to the reaction conditions using 2,6-dinitro- and 2,6-
dihydroxybenzoic acid as additives (entries 7-17), and by using
these additives, conjugate adduct 6a was obtained with a short
reaction time with 93% ee (entries 13 and 15). Further, 95% ee
was achieved by lowering the reaction temperature (entry 16).
With the optimized conditions in hand, we investigated the scope
of this asymmetric conjugate addition using R-heterosubstituted
aldehydes and vinyl sulfone as shown in Table 2. As for the
R-amino-substituted aldehydes 5a-e possessing the different sub-
stituent pattern of aromatic groups, m- and p-electron-donating
substituents, as well as the fused ring and the electron-withdrawing
group, were all tolerated, providing the corresponding conjugated
adducts 6a-e with uniformly high selectivity (entries 1-5). In the
case of R-amino-substituted aliphatic aldehydes 5f-g having sec-
and tert-alkyl groups, the reaction provided the conjugated adducts
6f-g consistently with 94% ee (entries 6 and 7). Whereas the
reaction with benzyl-substituted aldehyde 5h resulted in moderately
high enantioselectivity (entry 8), use of methyl-substituted analogue
5i furnished the conjugate adduct 6i with 81% ee (entry 9). In
general, the conjugate addition of R-amino-R-alkyl-substituted
aldehydes 5f-i proceeded slowly at -20 °C and required room
temperature (entries 6-9).8 Other substituted aldehydes such as
R-oxy and R-methyl aldehydes 5j-k7b were also employable with
high enantioselectivities (entries 10-12).
The absolute stereochemistry of the conjugate adduct 6a was
unambiguously determined to be S by conversion to the known
(S)-2-amino-2-phenyl-1-butanol as shown in the Supporting
Information.9 Based on the absolute configuration of (S)-6a, a
possible transition state model has been proposed as shown in
Figure 1 to account for the observed absolute configuration of
conjugate adduct 6a. In the generation of Z-enamine derived
from N-Boc R-aminophenylacetaldehyde 5a and the catalyst
(S,S)-2 under the experimental conditions, the Z-enamine 9 would
be stabilized by the hydrogen bonding between the ammonium
hydrogen and N-Boc group. Here, ArCO2- as an additive would
effectively shield the backside of 9. Then, 1,1-bis(benzenesulfo-
nyl)ethylene might approach from the upper side via additional
hydrogen bonding of a sulfonyl group with the Tf-amide
hydrogen, leading to conjugate adduct 6a with the observed S
configuration.
Table 2. Asymmetric Conjugate Addition of Heterosubstituted
Aldehydes Catalyzed by (S,S)-2a
Figure 1. A possible transition state structure.
In summary, we have succeeded in the asymmetric conjugate
addition of heterosubstituted aldehydes such as R-amido and
R-alkoxy aldehydes under the influence of structurally unique
organocatalyst 2. This strategy is, in principle, applicable to other
catalytic systems, and further effort to this end is currently underway
in our laboratory.
time
(h)
%
%
entry
substrate 5 (R,X)
yieldb
eec
1d
2
5a (Ph, NHBoc)
5b (m-MeO-C6H4,
NHBoc)
12
10
98
98
95
95
3
4
5c (p-MeO-C6H4,
NHBoc)
5d (p-Cl-C6H4,
NHBoc)
5e (R-Np, NHBoc)
5f (t-Bu, NHBoc)
5g (i-Pr, NHBoc)
5h (PhCH2, NHBoc)
5i (Me, NHBoc)
5j (Ph, OMe)
5j (Ph, OMe)
5k (Ph, Me)
10
25
98
90
94
94
Acknowledgment. The work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid
for Specially Promoted Research from the Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
5e
6
7
24
48
7
5
3
36
16
24
99
94
95
90
99
99
93
96
91
94
94
86
81
92
93
93
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and
characterization data for new compounds. This material is available
8
9
10d
References
11d f
,
12d
(1) Recent reviews on asymmetric aminocatalysis: (a) List, B. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed 2010, 49, 1730. (b) Bertelsen, S.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem. Soc. ReV.
2009, 38, 2178. (c) Melchiorre, P.; Marigo, M.; Carlone, A.; Bartoli, G.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6138. (d) List, B. Chem. Commun. 2006,
819. (e) List, B. Synlett 2001, 11, 1675.
(2) Reviews on asymmetric aminocatalysis by primary amino acids: (a) Xu,
L.-W.; Luo, J.; Lu, Y. Chem. Commun. 2009, 14, 1807. (b) Chen, Y.-C.
Synlett 2008, 13, 1919. (c) Peng, F.; Shao, Z. J. Mol. Catal. A 2008, 285, 1.
(3) Bennani, Y. L.; Hanessian, S. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 3161. See also: (a)
Uehara, H.; Barbas, C. F., III. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9848. (b)
Zhang, X.-J.; Liu, S.-P.; Li, X.-M.; Yan, M.; Chan, A. S. C. Chem. Commun.
2009, 833. (c) Luo, S.; Xu, H.; Chen, L.; Cheng, J.-P. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
1775. (d) Huang, H.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7170.
(e) Lalonde, M. P.; Chen, Y.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 6366. (f) Fuerst, D. E.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
8964.
a Unless otherwise specified, asymmetric conjugate addition of
heterosubstituted aldehydes and 1,1-bis(benzenesulfonyl)ethylene in the
presence of 10 mol
% of catalyst (S,S)-2 and 10 mol % of
2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid in toluene at room temperature under the
given conditions. b Isolated yield. c Enantiopurity of conjugate adducts
was determined by HPLC analysis using
a chiral column with
hexane-isopropyl alcohol as solvent (see Supporting Information). d At
-20 °C. e At 0 °C. f Use of 2,6-dinitrobenzoic acid.
In addition to 1,1-bis(benzenesulfonyl)ethylene, R-benzenesulfo-
nylvinylphosphate 7 can be also utilized as a conjugate acceptor in
the asymmetric conjugate addition of R-substituted aldehyde 5k to
furnish the desired adduct 8 with high diastereo- and enantiose-
lectivities.
(4) Recent reviews on R,R-dialkylated amino acids: (a) Tanaka, M. Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 2007, 55, 349. (b) Vogt, H.; Braese, S. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2007, 5, 406. (c) Ohfune, Y.; Shinada, T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 24,
5127. (d) Ohfune, Y.; Shinada, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2003, 76, 1115.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 48, 2010 17075