E. Winter et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18 (2010) 8026–8034
8033
malondialdehyde (MDA), producing a pink-colored Schiff base as
described previously.48 Briefly, the homogenate (400
g of protein)
was incubated under agitation in a buffer containing 60 mM
Tris–HCl (pH 7.4), 0.1 mM DPTA, 500 l 12% TCA, and 0.73% TBA.
The mixture was boiled for 2 h, cooled on ice and centrifuged at
10,000 rpm for 5 min. The absorbance of the supernatant was
measured at 535 nm. The results were calculated using the molar
extinction coefficient for malondialdehyde and expressed in nano-
moles of TBARS per microgram of protein. Protein content was
determined by Lowry’s method.46
4.14. ATP measurement
l
The intracellular ATP content was determined by a biolumines-
cence assay measuring the light output from the luciferin–
luciferase reaction. First, 1 ꢀ 106 L1210 cells were incubated with
l
the compounds (R7 23 lM, R13 37 lM, R15 36 lM) for 24 h. The
cell extracts were obtained by homogenization with 1.25% trichlo-
roacetic acid, then kept on ice for 30 min and neutralized with 1 M
Tris–acetate at pH 7.5. After centrifugation, the supernatants were
used for ATP quantification following the manufacturer’s protocol.
The results were normalized by the cell death percentage that
occurs during 24 h of incubation.
4.11. Mitochondrial potential measurement
To explore the effect of chalcones on mitochondrial membrane
potential, the lipophilic cationic probe fluorochrome 5,58,6,68-tet-
raethylbenzimidazolcarbocyanine iodide (JC-1) was used. JC-1 is a
green fluorescent monomer at depolarized membrane potential or
a red fluorescent J-aggregate at hyperpolarized membrane poten-
tial. Cells were plated at 5 ꢀ 105 cells/well in 24-well dishes and
4.15. Statistical analysis
The results were presented as means SD of triplicates from
three-independent experiments. Statistical significance was
assessed by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test, and p <0.05
was taken as statistical significance.
incubated with the chalcones for 4 h. Afterward, JC-1 (10
was added and incubated for 20 min at 37 °C (5% CO2), then cells
were washed twice with PBS, resuspended in 500 l of PBS. One
lg/ml)
Acknowledgments
l
hundred microliters was extracted and used to measure the fluo-
rescence using a spectrofluorimeter (Perkin–Elmer LS55). JC-1
was excited at 488 nm, the red emission fluorescence was detected
at 590 nm and the green fluorescence was detected at 527 nm. The
mitochondrial potential was presented as a ratio of 590/527 fluo-
rescence and compared with the control cells that were considered
to have 100% fluorescence. An electron transport chain uncoupler
This study was supported by grants from CNPq (Conselho
Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), CAPES
(Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior)
and FAPESC (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Santa Catarina).
This paper forms part of the Chemistry doctoral studies of Louise
D. Chiaradia, who synthesize the compounds, and part of the Phar-
macy master studies of Evelyn Winter. The group wishes to thank
the Hospital Universitário (HU) for the use of its facilities and the
Central de Análises (Departamento de Química, UFSC) for chemical
analyses.
(FCCP 1 lM) was used as a positive control.
4.12. Enzyme assays
Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) was assayed according to Flohé
Supplementary data
and Gunzler49 using 150
l
g of protein and NADPH oxidation was
monitored by its decrease in absorbance at 340 nm (
= 6220 Mꢁ1
cmꢁ1). Catalase activity was determined according to Aebi50 using
60 g of protein. In this assay, the disappearance of H2O2 was eval-
uated by measuring the decrease in absorbance at 240 nm (molar
e
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
l
References and notes
extinction coefficient:
e
= 40 Mꢁ1 cmꢁ1). Glutathione reductase
was assayed according to Carlberg and Mannervick51 and the
NADPH oxidation, which resulted from GSSG reduction by GR, was
1. Onciu, M. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am. 2009, 23, 655.
2. Pui, C. H.; Evans, W. E. N. Eng. J. Med. 2006, 354, 166.
3. Hoelzer, D.; Gokbuget, N. Rev. Clin. Oncol. Hematol. 2000, 36, 49.
4. Nicholson, D. W. Nature 2000, 407, 810.
5. Tsiftsoglou, A. S.; Pappas, I. S.; Vizirianakis, I. S. Pharmacol. Ther. 2003, 100, 257.
6. Lash, L. H. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2006, 163, 54.
7. Saraste, A.; Pulkki, K. Cardiovasc. Res. 2000, 45, 528.
8. Dias, N.; Bailly, C. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2005, 70, 1.
9. Riedl, S. J.; Shi, Y. Nature 2004, 5, 897.
10. Schafer, F. Q.; Buettner, G. R. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2001, 30, 1191.
11. Pelicano, H.; Carney, D.; Huanga, P. Drug Resist. Updat. 2004, 7, 97.
12. (a) Shin, S. W.; Seo, C. Y.; Han, H.; Han, J. Y.; Jeong, J. S.; Kwak, J. Y.; Park, J. I. Clin.
Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 5414; (b) Moon, D. O.; Kim, M. O.; Lee, J. D.; Choi, Y. H.;
Kim, G. Y. Cancer Lett. 2010, 288, 183.
determined by its decrease in absorbance at 340 nm (
cmꢁ1) using 150
g of protein. Glutathione S-transferase was
assayed according to Keen et al.52 using 60
g of protein. In this
e
= 6220 Mꢁ1
l
l
assay, GST induces the conjugationof GSH with CDNB. The conjugate
was detected spectrophotometrically at 340 nm. The results were
normalized by protein concentration and expressed as percentages
of enzyme activity.
4.13. Glutathione measurement
13. Dimmock, J. R.; Elias, D. W.; Beazely, M. A.; Kandepu, N. M. Curr. Med. Chem.
1999, 6, 1125.
14. Ni, L.; Meng, C. Q.; Sikorski, J. A. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2004, 14, 1669.
15. Nowakowska, Z. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 42, 125.
Total glutathione (GSH + GSSG) was measured using the gluta-
thione reductase method.53 In this assay, homogenate (50
l
g of
protein) was transferred to a 96-well plate, to which a solution
was added that contained 75
M 5,50-dithio-bis-2-nitrobenzoic
acid (DTNB), 120 M NADPH, 4 U/ml glutathione reductase (GR)
16. Kachadourian, R.; Day, B. J. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2006, 41, 65.
17. Navarini, A. L. F.; Chiaradia, L. D.; Mascarello, A.; Fritzen, M.; Nunes, R. J.; Yunes,
R. A.; Creczynski-Pasa, T. B. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 44, 1630.
18. Chiaradia, L. D.; dos Santos, R.; Vítor, C. E.; Vieira, A. A.; Leal, P. C.; Nunes, R. J.;
Calixto, J. B.; Yunes, R. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 658.
19. Tsai, S.; Klinmam, J. P. Bioorg. Chem. 2003, 31, 172.
20. Nam, N. H.; Kim, Y.; You, Y. J.; Hong, D. H.; Kim, H. M.; Ahn, B. Z. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2003, 38, 179.
21. Zhang, G.; Wu, H.; Zhu, B.; Shimoishi, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Murata, Y. Biosci.,
Biotechnol., Biochem. 2008, 72, 2966.
22. Nakatani, N.; Ichimaru, M.; Moriyasu, M.; Kato, A. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2005, 28, 83.
23. Li, N.; Ragheb, K.; Lawler, G.; Sturgir, J.; Rajwa, B.; Melendez, J. A.; Robinson, J. P.
J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 8516.
l
l
and 10 mM EDTA in 200 mM phosphate buffer at pH 8.0. The
absorbance was measured at 405 nm using a microwell systems
reader. The concentrations of total glutathione (TG) and GSH were
calculated using GSH as a standard and were normalized by
protein concentration. The content of GSSG was calculated as fol-
low: GSSG = (TG ꢁ GSH)/2. GSSG is equivalent to 2 GSH according
to the following reaction: GSSG + NADPH + H+ ? 2 GSH + NADP+
in the presence of GR. The results were expressed as percentages.
24. Jing, Y.; Dai, J.; Chalmers-Redman, R. M.; Tatton, W. G.; Waxman, S. Blood 1999,
94, 2102.