6634 Organometallics, Vol. 29, No. 24, 2010
Tomooka et al.
and 13C{1H} NMR spectroscopic analysis.9 Since this bridge-
head alkene with a unique nonplanar π system can be regarded
as a bicyclic analogue of (E)-cyclooctene, which has been the
legendary prototypical example of planar chiral cyclic com-
pounds, it is of interest to compare the NMR data of (()-4b
with the reported data of 7.
Table 1. 13C{1H} Chemical Shifts and 1JPt-C Coupling
Constantsa
δ
C(1), ΔδC(1), 1JPt-C(1), δC(2), ΔδC(2), 1JPt-C(2)
,
ppm ppm
Hz
ppm ppm
Hz
ref
PtCl2
(()-4a
83.2b 41.0c
193.1d 95.7e 41.3f 170.0g this
work
175.7 92.7e 40.9f 162.6 this
work
(()-4b
105.1b 29.4c
7
8a
120.4 27.8
92.5 29.0
116.0 14.7
211.6 84.3 41.5
155
143.6 84.7 34.0
202.9
9
10
9
8b
Pt(PPh3)2
147.2
A
B
C
D
61.4 86.6
66.9h
320
407h
343h
296i
194
52.5 73.5
220
8c
8d
8d
8d
8c
74.9h
78.8i
Pt(C2H4)(PPh3)2 39.6 88
d 1
a In CDCl3 unless otherwise noted. b δC(3)
.
c ΔδC(3)
.
J
.
e δC(4)
.
Pt-C(3)
g 1
f ΔδC(4)
.
J
.
h C6D6, 298 K. i In toluene-d8, 338 K.
Pt-C(4)
Table 1 gives select 13C{1H} NMR data for (()-4a and (()-
4b along with those for related platinum complexes. Note-
worthy are the large upfield shifts on coordination (Δδ) for
disubstituted carbons C(3) and C(4) in (()-4a (41.0 and 41.3
ppm, respectively) as well as C(4) in (()-4b (40.9 ppm), which
are very similar to that for C(2) in 7 (41.5 ppm). Also, the
upfield shift for trisubstituted carbon C(3) in (()-4b (29.4
ppm) is also similar to that for C(1) in 7 (27.8 ppm). More-
over, the 1JPt-C coupling constants ((()-4a, 193.1 and 170.0
Hz; (()-4b, 175.7 and 162.6 Hz) far exceeding those for 8a or
8b around 150 Hz are indicative of a stronger interaction of
the (E)-olefin in (()-1a and (()-1b, with the platinum center
arising from more pronounced rehybridization relative to
ordinary unstrained olefins, while the degree of contribution
of a platinacyclopropane structure in (()-4a or (()-4b may
surrounding the platinum in the solid state, as shown in
Figures 1 and 2.12 Their pyridine nuclei also adopt an almost
perpendicular arrangement with respect to the coordination
plane.3d,13 These features are interpreted as a result of a steric
repulsion between the two o-methyl groups and the two
chloro ligands, which should provide an opportunity for
the 5d orbitals of platinum to overlap with the two π*
molecular orbitals at the pyridine nucleus and olefin (i.e.,
back-donation). The overlap should be positioned trans but
orthogonal to each other. We believe that the two o-methyl
groups should contribute to the reduction of the lability of
ligands around the central platinum in (()-4a and (()-4b
(vide infra).14
The selected bond lengths for the coordinated C(3)-C(4)
unit in the solid-state structure of (()-4a and (()-4b are
summarized in Table 2. However, distinctive features for our
complexes cannot be fully extracted, due to the paucity of
data for the solid-state structures of PtCl2 complexes having
a multisubstituted olefin or an originally distorted olefinic
ligand, except for the well-known trans-PtCl2((E)-cyclo-
octene)[(R)-(þ)-PhCH(NH2)CH3] (9).15 It has been claimed
that the magnitude of back-donation in Pt(η2-olefin) com-
plexes may be more appreciably manifested in the solid-state
structures at the C-C bond length rather than at the Pt-C
bond length, which can greatly hinge on steric require-
ments.8c,16 However, we note that the C(3)-C(4) bond
1
be less prominent than that in 7 with JPt-C values over
200 Hz or in a series of Pt(PPh3)2 complexes A-D with much
larger 1JPt-C values.11
Not surprisingly, the C(3)-C(4) units of (()-4a and (()-4b
adopt an upright geometry with respect to the square plane
(9) Godleski, S. A.; Valpey, R. S.; Gundlach, K. B. Organometallics
1983, 2, 1254–1257.
(10) (a) van der Poel, H.; van Koten, G.; Kokkes, M.; Stam, C. H.
Inorg. Chem. 1981, 20, 2941–2950. (b) Erdogan, G.; Grotjahn, D. B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10354–10355.
(11) A slight decrease in the olefinic 1JC-H value upon complexation
was commonly observed in the case of torsionally strained olefin
complexes such as 7 (from 160.6 to 159.8 Hz)9 or RuCl2(pybox-ip)-
[(-)-(E)-cyclooctene] (from 150.6 to 148.7 Hz); see: Nishiyama, H.;
Naitoh, T.; Motoyama, Y.; Aoki, K. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 3509–3513.
Similar changes for (()-4a, (()-4b, and their congeners will be measured and
reported separately.
(14) As early as 1969, Orchin and co-workers reported14a that
pyridinic ligands undergo more rapid ligand exchange with solvent
molecules than olefinic ligands in this class of compounds, but the
anomalous feature of 3 arising from 2,6-disubstitution at the pyridine
nuclei has been documented later by a number of research groups3b-f
including themselves.14b (a) Kaplan, P. D.; Schmidt, P.; Brause, A.;
Orchin, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 85–88. (b) Pesa, F.; Spaulding, L.;
Orchin, M. J. Coord. Chem. 1975, 4, 225–230.
(12) (a) Hartley, F. R. Chem. Rev. 1969, 69, 799–844. (b) Hartley, F. R.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1972, 11, 596–606. (c) Albright, T. A.;
Hoffmann, R.; Thibeault, J. C.; Thorn, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101,
3801–3812. (d) Tsipis, A. C. Organometallics 2008, 27, 3701–3713 and
references therein.
(13) Either the (E)-olefin or 2,4,6-trimethylpyridine ligand of (()-4a
and (()-4b should rotate freely in solution, at least at ambient tempera-
ture, since the two methyl groups at the 2,6-position of the pyridine ring
were observed as equivalent signals in NMR spectra of their CDCl3
solution, despite the unsymmetrical structure of their olefinic units (see
the Supporting Information).
(15) (a) Cope, A. C.; Ganellin, C. R.; Johnson, H. W., Jr.; van Auken,
T. V.; Winkler, H. J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 3276–3279. (b) Monor,
P. C.; Shoemaker, D. P.; Parkes, A. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 5260–5262.
(16) (a) Evans, A.; Mortimer, C. T.; Puddephatt, R. J. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1974, 72, 295–297. (b) Tsuchiya, K.; Kondo, H.; Nagashima, H.
Organometallics 2007, 26, 1044–1051 and references therein.