6940
C. Lim et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 6938–6941
and SC-558 (a celecoxib analogue) are partially overlapped, and
their benzenesulfonamide groups are nearly superimposed
(Fig. 2). The Ar-SO2NH2 group of 8c interacts with the amino acid
residues lining the COX-2 binding site (Gly519, Phe518, Ala516,
Gln192, Arg513, and His90). The two oxygen atoms of the SO2NH2
group form two hydrogen bonds with the backbone NHs of His90
and Arg513 (distance = 2.87 Å). In addition, other possible hydro-
gen bonds are observed between the nitrogen of the SO2NH2 moi-
ety and the backbone carbonyl in Gln192 (distance = 3.72 Å)/
Phe518 (distance = 3.84 Å)/Leu352 (distance = 4.12 Å). These
observations suggest that styrylheterocyclic sulfonamides interact
favorably within the COX-2 binding site.
To understand the underlying molecular mechanisms that lead
to the inhibition of PGE2 production, the suppressive effect of 8c on
the COX-2 mRNA expression was investigated using reverse tran-
scription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis.25 Treat-
ment with LPS for 5 h dramatically increased the expression of
the COX-2 mRNA levels, and the induction was suppressed by
the treatment of 8c in a concentration-dependent manner as de-
picted in Figure 3. Based on our observations, we hypothesize that
the inhibitory effects of styrylheterocycles 8c against LPS-stimu-
lated PGE2 production may in part be correlated with the suppres-
sion of COX-2 mRNA expression. However, because the suppressive
effect of 8c on the COX-2 mRNA expression was not reached com-
pletely at the IC50 value of PGE2 production, other mechanisms
such as direct COX-2 inhibitory activity could not be excluded.
Therefore, the inhibition of PGE2 production in LPS-activated
RAW264.7 cells by styrylheterocyles might be due to either sup-
pression of COX-2 expression or direct inhibition of COX-2 enzyme
activity.
In summary, although the caution with the cardiovascular side
effect by vicinal diaryl heterocycle class compounds targeting
COX-2 activity was recently raised, studies are still required to ex-
plore new templates having reduced cardiovascular adverse ef-
fects. In this study, a series of styrylheterocycle derivatives have
been prepared and evaluated as to their effects on COX-2-mediated
PGE2 production, with the goal of identifying a potent modulator.
Our previous lead compound 1 was optimized by the incorporation
of a p-SO2NH2 COX-2 pharmacophore. We found that (E)-4-(2-
(thiophen-3-yl)vinyl)benzenesulfonamide (8c) exhibited a potent
inhibitory activity against the overproduction of the inflammatory
mediator PGE2 and could serve as a new therapeutic agent for the
treatment of diseases mediated by PGs. We have also gained in-
sight into the structure–activity relationship of styrylheterocycles
that is valuable in the design and development of new class of
inhibitors of PG synthesis. Further studies are currently in progress,
including a more detailed biological evaluation and chemical
optimizations.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a grant KRF-2007-313-E00617
(S.K.L.), and WCU program(R32-2008-000-10098-0) (S.K.), Republic
of Korea.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Vane, J. R.; Bakhle, Y. S.; Botting, R. M. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1998, 38,
97.
2. Dubois, R. N.; Abramson, S. B.; Crofford, L.; Gupta, R. A.; Simon, L. S.; Van de
Putte, L. B. A.; Lipsky, P. E. FASEB J. 1998, 12, 1063.
3. Prescott, S. M.; Fitzpatrick, F. A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1470, M69.
4. Imbimbo, B. P. Expert. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2009, 18, 1147.
5. White, W. B. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2007, 11, 428.
Figure 2. Docking model of compound 8c within the active site of COX-2 (Protein
Data Bank code 1CX2). Compound 8c (shown in magenta) and SC-558 (shown in
gray) are overlaid and hydrogen bonds and possible hydrogen bonds are indicated
by red dashed and orange solid lines, respectively. The key amino acid residues are
shown in green. For clarity, only active site residues are designated.
6. Molina, M. A.; Sitja-Arnau, M.; Lemoine, M. G.; Frazier, M. L.; Sinicrope, F. A.
Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 4356.
7. Nakanishi, Y.; Kamijo, R.; Takizawa, K.; Hatori, M.; Nagumo, M. Eur. J. Cancer
2001, 37, 1570.
8. Xu, X.-M.; Sansores-Garcia, L.; Chen, X.-M.; Matijevic-Aleksic, N.; Du, M.; Wu,
K. K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1999, 96, 5292.
9. Hla, T.; Bishop-Bailey, D.; Liu, C. H.; Schaefers, H. J.; Trifan, O. C. Int. J. Biochem.
Cell Biol. 1999, 31, 551.
10. Marnett, L. J.; Rowlinson, S. W.; Goodwin, D. C.; Kalgutkar, A. S.; Lanzo, C. A. J.
Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 22903.
11. Smith, W. L.; Garavito, R. M.; DeWitt, D. L. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 33157.
12. Morita, I. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2002, 68–69, 165.
13. (a) Karamouzis, M. V.; Papavassiliou, A. G. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2004, 13,
359; (b) Basler, J. W.; Piazza, G. A. J. Urol. 2004, 171, S59; (c) Teismann, P.; Tieu,
K.; Choi, D.-K.; Wu, D.-C.; Naini, A.; Hunot, S.; Vila, M.; Jackson-Lewis, V.;
Przedborski, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2003, 100, 5473.
Figure 3. Effects of 8c on the expression of COX-2 mRNA in LPS-stimulated
RAW264.7 cells using RT-PCR analysis. Modulation of COX-2 mRNA expression by
8c in LPS-stimulated macrophage cells. RAW264.7 cells (5 Â 105 cells/ml) were
14. Chakraborti, A. K.; Garg, S. K.; Kumar, R.; Motiwala, H. F.; Jadhavar, P. S. Curr.
Med. Chem. 2010, 17, 1563.
incubated for 24 h and then treated with 1
lg/ml LPS with or without various
15. (a) Talley, J. J. Prog. Med. Chem. 1999, 36, 201; (b) Zarghi, A.; Rao, P. N. P.; Knaus,
E. E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 1957; (c) Kurumbail, R. G.; Stevens, A. M.;
Gierse, J. K.; McDonald, J. J.; Stegeman, R. A.; Pak, J. Y.; Gildehaus, D.; Miyashiro,
J. M.; Penning, T. D.; Seibert, K.; Isakson, P. C.; Stallings, W. C. Nature 1996, 384,
644; (d) Walker, M. C.; Kurumbail, R. G.; Kiefer, J. R.; Moreland, K. T.; Koboldt,
C. M.; Isakson, P. C.; Seibert, K.; Gierse, J. K. Biochem. J. 2001, 357, 709.
concentrations of 8c for an additional 5 h. Total RNA was isolated and 1
lg of RNA
was used for reverse transcription. The cDNA obtained was used in the polymerase
chain reaction using Taq DNA polymerase and specific primers. PCR products were
separated by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with SYBR Gold, and visualized
under a UV transilluminator.