7428
L. You et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 7426–7428
Table 1
replacement at 3-position of coumarin core, of which the in vitro
anti-breast cancer activities against MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell
lines were investigated, and preliminary SAR around this scaffold
was established. The results indicated that 7-methoxy and 3-aryl
ring are critical for maintaining cytotoxicity potency. Compound
8e were the most potent analogs (IC50 values of 0.24 and
Cell growth inhibitory activity of osthole derivatives 8–15 in various cell lines with
MTT assay
Compound no.
MCF-7 Cell growth
MDA-MB-231
IC50 (lM)
inhibition IC50
(l
M)b
Tamoxifen citratea
Osthole (1)
6
8ª
8b
8c
8d
8e
8f
8g
8h
8i
10.3
25.8
47.0
51.6
24.5
42.9
52.6
0.24
27.3
50.2
3.23
1.27
5.70
NA
12.8
30.2
NAc
NA
38.1
NA
1.27 lM, respectively, against the MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell
lines), and showed 100 higher antitumor activity compared with
osthol, and lacked cytotoxicity to normal HERK-293 cells. Mecha-
nism of action study is ongoing and the latest progress will be re-
ported in due course. In summary, 8e and 8i are the two novel and
promising lead compounds suitable for further development to-
ward a potential clinical trials candidate.
NA
0.31
33.6
NA
4.15
5.23
7.42
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Acknowledgments
8j
11
12
13
14
15
Financial assistance from Project of Shanghai Educational Com-
mission (08CZ08). ‘Xinlin’ scholars and outstanding team training
plan of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
NA
NA
NA
45.9
a
b
c
Supplementary data
Positive control.
Mean IC50
(
lM), from three or more independent tests.
NA means not active and having IC50 >50
lM.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
most potent analog investigated in this study appears to be triflu-
ormethyl phenyl derivative 8e, of which the cytotoxic activity
against MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines was improved more
References and notes
1. Musa, M. A.; Cooperwood, J. S.; Khan, M. O. Curr. Med. Chem. 2008, 15, 2664.
2. Borges, F.; Roleira, F.; Milhazes, N.; Santana, L.; Uriarte, E. Curr. Med. Chem.
2005, 12, 887.
3. Kostova, I.; Raleva, S.; Genova, P.; Argirova, R. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2006, 68274.
4. Okamoto, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Yoshida, S. Curr. Med. Chem.: Anti-Cancer Agents
2005, 5, 47.
5. Kostova, I.; Momekov, G.; Tzanova, T.; Karaivanova, M. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl.
2006, 25651, 1.
6. Weber, U. S.; Steffen, B.; Siegers, C. P. Res. Commun. Mol. Pathol. Pharmacol.
1998, 99, 193.
7. Kung Sutherland, M. S.; Lipps, S. G.; Patnaik, N.; Gayo-Fung, L. M.;
Khammungkune, S.; Xie, W.; Brady, H. A.; Barbosa, M. S.; Anderson, D. W.;
Stein, B. Cytokine 2003, 23, 1.
8. Brady, H.; Doubleday, M.; Gayo-Fung, L. M.; Hickman, M.; Khammungkhune, S.;
Kois, A.; Lipps, S.; Pierce, S.; Richard, N.; Shevlin, G.; Sutherland, M. K.;
Anderson, D. W.; Bhagwat, S. S.; Stein, B. Mol. Pharmacol. 2002, 61, 562.
9. Magriples, U.; Naftolin, F.; Schwartz, P. E. J. Clin. Oncol. 1993, 11, 485.
10. Mourits, M. J.; De Vries, E. G.; Willemse, P. H.; Ten Hoor, K. A.; Hollema, H.; Van
der Zee, A. G. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001, 97, 855.
11. Chalas, E.; Costantino, J. P.; Wickerham, D. L. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 192,
1230.
12. (a) You, L.; Feng, S.; An, R.; Wang, X. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2009, 4, 297; (b)
Okamoto, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Yoshida, S. Curr. Med. Chem.: Anti-Cancer Agents
2005, 5, 47.
13. Ng, T. B. Recent Prog. Med. Plants 2006, 12, 129.
14. Tang, C. H.; Yang, R. S.; Chien, M. Y.; Chen, C. C.; Fu, W. M. Eur. J. Pharmacol.
2008, 579, 40.
15. Okamoto, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Yoshida, S. Med. Chem. 2007, 3, 35.
16. Hamelers, I.; Schaik, R.; Sussenbach, J. S.; Steenbergh, P. H. Cancer Cell Int. 2003,
3, 10.
17. Stanway, S. J.; Purohit, A.; Woo, L. W.; Sufi, S.; Vigushin, D.; Ward, R.; Wilson, R.
H.; Stanczyk, F. Z.; Dobbs, N.; Kulinskaya, E.; Elliott, M.; Potter, B. V.; Reed, M. J.;
Coombes, R. C. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 1585.
18. (a) Brady, H.; Desai, S.; Gayo-Fung, L. M.; Khammungkhune, S.; McKie, J. A.;
O’Leary, E.; Pascasio, L.; Sutherland, M. K.; Anderson, D. W.; Bhagwat, S. S.;
Stein, B. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 1439; (b) Lukatela, G.; Krauss, N.; Theis, K.;
Selmer, T.; Gieselmann, V.; von Figura, K.; Saenger, W. Biochemistry 1998, 37,
3654.
than 100-fold to 0.24
its parent compound osthole.
For the analog 8i bearing p-chloro phenyl substituted at 3-posi-
tion, the antitumor activity was improved significantly (1.27 M vs
lM, 0.31 lM, respectively, compared with
l
25.8 against MCF-7), about 20-fold higher than its parent com-
pound. The inhibitory activity of compound 8h containing p-phe-
nol also had eight times increase (IC50 value is 3.23 lM).
Compounds 8a, 8b, 8d and 8f, which incorporate dimethoxyl phe-
nyl, trifluormethyl, fluoro, and difluoro phenyl at 3-position of the
coumarin ring, respectively, showed slightly increase (two, three-
fold) or comparable cytotoxic activity with osthole. In contrast,
methyl phenyl derivative 8g was found to weakly inhibit human
cancer cell growth in vitro with IC50 values around 50 lM.
The activity of demethylated compound 8j declined more than
20-folds, 8c is a 7-position analog prepared from 8b, exhibited re-
duced activity (IC50 = 42.9 lM), it revealed that the 7-methyloxy
group is a very sensitive substituent for maintaining the antitumor
activity. Same impacts were also observed in compound 11, which
is a hydrogenated and demethylated osthole derivative, of which
the activity was totally lost. The replacement of the phenyl ring
12 by a 3-pyridyl moiety also leads to the losing of cellular activity.
Compounds 13 and 14 did not show even lowest activity.
Since 8e and 8i showed better cell growth inhibition for breast
cancer cell lines than tamoxifen citrate and osthole, their cytotox-
icity was also tested in normal cells, Human Embryonic Kidney
(HEK)-293. Results show that 8e and 8i had no cell growth inhib-
itory effect in HEK-293 cells. The further MOA and in vivo study
for 8e is under going now.
In conclusion, we designed and prepared a series of novel ost-
hole derivatives by structural modification and bio-isosteric