86
D. V. Kumar et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 82–87
Table 3
Optimization of benzyl ester series
O
N
O
O
Ar
R3
#
IC50
(
lM)
EC50
(l
M)
GI50 (lM)
R2
Ar
R2
R3
10
17
18
19
20
21
4-Cl-phenyl
4-Cl-phenyl
4-Cl-phenyl
4-Tolyl
2-Tolyl
3-Tolyl
4-Cl
4-Cl
4-Cl
2-F, 4-CF3
2-F, 4-CF3
2-F, 4-CF3
6,7-Dimethoxy
0.02
1.2
1.7
28.3
>12
1.1
20
31
7.3
6-Fluoro, 7-morpholinyl
6-Fluoro, 7-piperazinyl
6,7-Dimethoxy
6,7-Dimethoxy
6,7-Dimethoxy
0.020
0.010
0.008
0.015
0.06
0.12a
0.23
0.71
1.2
a
1a replicon EC50 = 0.41 lM.
methyl sulfone, which makes mostly hydrophobic interactions
with Val 485, Leu 489, and Leu 419. Leu 419 and Ile 482 adopt dif-
ferent rotamers than seen in the 1OS5 structure, allowing for better
hydrophobic packing with the quinolone ring. Finally, the pipera-
zine is largely solvent exposed, confirming our earlier hypothesis
that the 6- and 7-positions project towards solvent.
A final round of optimization led to improvement in replicon
potency. With evidence that the 6,7-positions of the quinolone
scaffold were indeed solvent exposed, we sought to improve the
replicon potency of our lead benzyl ester compounds by attaching
a variety of polar substituents in this region of the molecule. The 7-
morpholinyl substituted analog (17) did not offer improvement in
replicon potency but the charged 7-piperazinyl substituted analog
References and notes
1. Choo, Q. L.; Richman, K. H.; Han, J. H.; Berger, K.; Lee, C.; Dong, C.; Gallegos, C.;
Coit, D.; Medina-Selby, R.; Barr, P. J., et al Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1991, 88,
2451.
2. Cohen, J. Science 1999, 285, 26.
3. Reed, K. E.; Rice, C. M. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2000, 242, 55.
4. McHutchison, J. G. Am. J. Manag. Care 2004, 10, S21.
5. Seeff, L. B. Semin Gastrointest. Dis. 1995, 6, 20.
6. Fried, M. W.; Shiffman, M. L.; Reddy, K. R.; Smith, C.; Marinos, G.; Goncales, F. L.,
Jr.; Haussinger, D.; Diago, M.; Carosi, G.; Dhumeaux, D.; Craxi, A.; Lin, A.;
Hoffman, J.; Yu, J. N. Eng. J. Med. 2002, 347, 975.
7. Hayashi, N.; Takehara, T. J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 41, 17.
8. Manns, M. P.; McHutchison, J. G.; Gordon, S. C.; Rustgi, V. K.; Shiffman, M.;
Reindollar, R.; Goodman, Z. D.; Koury, K.; Ling, M.; Albrecht, J. K. Lancet 2001,
358, 958.
9. Manns, M. P.; Foster, G. R.; Rockstroh, J. K.; Zeuzem, S.; Zoulim, F.; Houghton, M.
Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2007, 6, 991.
10. Kolykhalov, A. A.; Mihalik, K.; Feinstone, S. M.; Rice, C. M. J. Virol. 2000, 74,
2046.
11. Erhardt, A.; Deterding, K.; Benhamou, Y.; Reiser, M.; Forns, X.; Pol, S.; Calleja, J.
L.; Ross, S.; Spangenberg, H. C.; Garcia-Samaniego, J.; Fuchs, M.; Enriquez, J.;
Wiegand, J.; Stern, J.; Wu, K.; Kukolj, G.; Marquis, M.; Beaulieu, P.; Nehmiz, G.;
Steffgen, J. Antivir. Ther. 2009, 14, 23.
12. Kneteman, N. M.; Howe, A. Y.; Gao, T.; Lewis, J.; Pevear, D.; Lund, G.; Douglas,
D.; Mercer, D. F.; Tyrrell, D. L.; Immermann, F.; Chaudhary, I.; Speth, J.; Villano,
S. A.; O’Connell, J.; Collett, M. Hepatology 2009, 49, 745.
13. Toniutto, P.; Fabris, C.; Bitetto, D.; Fumolo, E.; Fornasiere, E.; Pirisi, M. IDrugs
2008, 11, 738.
14. Hang, J. Q.; Yang, Y.; Harris, S. F.; Leveque, V.; Whittington, H. J.; Rajyaguru, S.;
Ao-Ieong, G.; McCown, M. F.; Wong, A.; Giannetti, A. M.; Le Pogam, S.; Talamas,
F.; Cammack, N.; Najera, I.; Klumpp, K. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 15517.
15. Koch, U.; Narjes, F. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets 2006, 6, 31.
16. Pauwels, F.; Mostmans, W.; Quirynen, L. M.; van der Helm, L.; Boutton, C. W.;
Rueff, A. S.; Cleiren, E.; Raboisson, P.; Surleraux, D.; Nyanguile, O.; Simmen, K.
A. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 6909.
(18) improved replicon potency to 0.12
mised safety window. This compound was also tested in the geno-
type 1a replicon and had a comparable potency of 0.41 M.
lM, albeit with a compro-
l
Improvement in binding affinity also led to improved replicon po-
tency. This is exemplified in analogs with 2-fluoro, 4-trifluoro-
methyl benzyl substitution at the 1-position (19–21). Compound
19 with the most improved enzyme potency at 8 nM also had
improved replicon potency (replicon 1b EC50 = 0.23 lM) and a
100-fold safety window. The 2-, 3- and 4-tolyl substitution off
the benzyl ester (compounds 19–21) showed that 4-substituted
benzyl ester has the best binding potency, while 2- and 3-substitu-
tion results in a relative potency loss.
Scheme 1 describes the preparationof compound3, which exempli-
fies the synthesis of keto-quinolone compounds shown in Table 1.21
Scheme 2 describes the preparation of the benzyl ester 16
which serves to exemplify syntheses of key quinolone compounds
with a benzyl ester substituent at the 3-position. The details for
synthesis of this and other key compounds in Tables 2 and 3 have
been described previously.18c
In conclusion, we have described the discovery of a novel class
of compounds that inhibit HCV viral replication. This class of com-
pounds binds to the allosteric site NNI-2 of NS5B polymerase as
confirmed through a co-crystal structure of compound 16 to
NS5B. Preliminary optimization led to attractive lead compounds
with sub-micromolar replicon potency in genotypes 1a and 1b.
Recognizing the possible in vivo liability of the key benzyl ester
substitution in these lead compounds, we initiated SAR directed
towards replacing this ester functionality. Our efforts in this area
will be the subject of a future disclosure.
17. Lohmann, V.; Korner, F.; Koch, J.-O.; Herian, U.; Theilmann, L.; Bartenschlager,
R. Science 1999, 285, 110.
18a. As described in: McKercher, G.; Beaulieu, P. L.; Lamarre, D.; LaPlante, S.;
Lefebvre, S.; Pellerin, C.; Thauvette, L.; Kukolj, G. Nuclic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 422;
scintillation proximity assays (SPA) were performed at ambient temperature
(22 °C) in 96-well plates using 50 nM of enzyme (a C-terminal 21 residue
deletion mutant of NS5b from genotype 1b BK isolate). Reaction components
included 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 5%
DMSO, 0.01% BSA and 25 mM KCl. 80
mixture of 0.5
Ci of [3H]UTP, 1 M UTP, 250 nM 50-biotinylated oligo(rU12
and 0.8 g/ml poly(rA) to assay wells containing enzyme preincubated with
inhibitor. Reactions were terminated after 120 min by the addition of 20 l of
stop solution containing 150 g/ml tRNA and 10 mg/ml streptavidin-coated
SPA beads (Amersham) in 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 25 mM KCl, 0.5 M EDTA and
0.025% sodium azide. After incubation for 30 min, 65 l of 5 M cesium chloride
ll reactions were initiated by adding a
l
l
)
l
l
l
l
were added to the wells and further incubated for 1 h before top-counting in a
Microbeta Trilux plate reader.
18b. Replicon assay: HCV replicon-containing cells (Huh7/Clone A, genotype 1b)
were maintained in growth medium (DMEM medium, Invitrogen),
supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum, non essential amino acids and
1 mg/mL G418) (Blight, K. J.; Kolykhalov, A. A.; Rice, C. M. Science 2000, 290,
1972–1974). For the HCV replicon assay, Huh7/Clone A cells were trypsinized
from culture flasks, seeded in 1 ml of Clone A growth medium without G418 at
40,000 cells per well in 24-well plates and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified
CO2 (5%) incubator overnight. Following overnight incubation, test compound
was serially diluted in DMSO and added to the test system such that the final
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Dr. Robert Booth (Virobay Inc.) for support of
the research that went into this Letter.