Y. Taniguchi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18 (2010) 8614–8617
8617
stirring for 24 h at the same temperature, the reaction was
quenched by saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and extracted with
organic solvents (chloroform/isopropanol 4:1, v/v). The organic
layer was washed with brine and dried over anhydrous MgSO4,
and then the solvent was concentrated under reduced pressure.
The crude product was purified by silica-gel column chromatogra-
phy (chloroform/methanol = 15:1) to give 4 (310 mg, 0.87 mmol,
87%) as an orange oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) d 2.26 (br s,
1H), 2.33 (br s, 6H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 3.37–3.40 (m, 1H), 3.50–3.54
(m, 1H), 4.02 (s, 3H), 7.35 (d, 2H, J = 8.24 Hz), 7.75 (d, 1H,
J = 12.4 Hz), 7.77 (d, 2H, J = 8.24 Hz), 11.0 (br s, 1H). 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 125 MHz) d 21.7, 51.8, 68.4, 70.0, 111.9, 128.0, 130.1,
132.2, 145.5, 161.1. FTIR (neat): 3357, 1629, 1200 cmꢀ1. HRMS
(ESI) m/z: calcd for C16H22NO6S (M+H)+ 356.1162, found 356.1156.
cn 25
DNA (final concn 1
concn 1 M), copper acetate (final concn 5
buffer (final concn 50 mM at pH 12) in a final reaction volume of
50 L.
Method B for Fig. 6: The reaction was initiated by the addition of
copper acetate (final concn 5 M) to a reaction mixture which was
mixed with the target DNA (final concn 1 M), Probe1 (final concn
M), Probe2 (final concn 1 M), luminol sodium (final concn
M), ascorbic acid (final concn 25 M), and H3BO3–NaOH buffer
(final concn 50 mM at pH 12) in a final reaction volume of 50 L.
l
M) to a reaction mixture which was mixed with the target
M), Probe1 (final concn 1 M), Probe2 (final
M), and H3BO3–NaOH
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
25
l
l
l
l
l
The luminescence was measured by a luminometer produced by
PROMEGA.
Acknowledgments
4.2. Synthesis of the oligonucleotides
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (S) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS),
CREST from Japan Science and Technology Agency. We acknowl-
edge Dr. Kenji Yoza at BRUKER AXS for the X-ray study.
All oligonucleotides were synthesized on a 1 lmol scale by an
ABI 394 DNA/RNA synthesizer with the standard b-cyanoethyl
phosphoramidite chemistry. All amidite reagents and CPG supports
were synthesized or purchased from Glen Research. After synthesis
of the 50-modified or 30-modified ODNs, they were cleaved from
the CPG resin in 28% ammonium hydroxide solution. The crude
product was purified by RP-HPLC (column: nacalai tesque COSMO-
SIL 5C18MS-II 10 ꢁ 250 mm, solvent: A; 0.1 M TEAA, B; CH3CN, and
B concn 10–40%/20 min linear gradient, 3 mL/min flow rate, de-
tected at 254 nm). These ODNs were treated with 10% acetic acid
and washed with Et2O, and then the water phase was lyophilized
under reduced pressure to remove the DMTr-protecting group.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (NMR spectra, crystal structure and data)
associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at
References and notes
1. (a) Silverman, A. P.; Kool, E. T. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3775; (b) Mora, J. R.; Getts,
R. C. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2007, 7, 775; (c) Landegren, U.; Kaiser, R.; Sanders,
J.; Hood, L. Science 1988, 241, 1077.
2. (a) Syvänen, A.-C. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2, 930; (b) Slate, J.; Gratten, J.; Beraldi,
D.; Stapley, J.; Hale, M.; Pemberton, J. M. Genetica 2009, 136, 97.
3. Tyagi, S.; Kramer, F. R. Nat. Biotechnol. 1996, 14, 303.
4.3. General procedure of synthesis of ligand conjugated ODN
probes. The synthesis of Probes1 and 2
The corresponding ODNs were treated with TCEP (3.0 equiv) in
water for 1 h for conversion to the thiol group. These thiol-modi-
fied ODNs were then added to the solution of 4 (30 equiv) in the
mixture of DMF and sodium bicarbonate buffer/DMF (9:1) at
50 °C for 6 h. The resulting mixture was purified by RP-HPLC (col-
umn: nacalai tesque COSMOSIL 5C18MS-II 10 ꢁ 250 mm, solvent:
A; 0.1 M TEAA, B; CH3CN, and B concn 10–40%/20 min linear gradi-
ent, 3 mL/min flow rate, detected at 254 nm). The structures of all
ODNs were confirmed by MALDI-TOF MS measurement. The
MALD/MS data of the synthesized probes: Probe1 (n = 1), 30
CGACCCGCAATT-(C3)-ligand, calcd: 3926.4; found: 3925.6. Probe1
(n = 2): 30 CGACCCGCAATT-(C6)-ligand, calcd; 3969.9; found:
3968.4. Probe2 (n = 1), 50 GTTCGCCTCTTT-(C3)-ligand, calcd:
3915.2; found: 3914.2. Probe2 (n = 2), 50 GTTCGCCTCTTT-(C6)-li-
gand, calcd: 3953.2; found, 3952.9.
4. Recent reviews: (a) Wang, K.; Tang, Z.; Yang, C. J.; Kim, Y.; Fang, X.; Li, W.; Wu,
Y.; Medley, C. D.; Cao, Z.; Li, J.; Colon, P.; Lin, H.; Tan, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 856; (b) Venkatesan, N.; Seo, Y. J.; Kim, B. H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37,
648.
5. Recent examples: (a) Gerasimova, Y. V.; Hayson, A.; Ballantyne, J.;
Kolpashchikov, D. M. ChemBioChem 2010, 11, 1762; (b) Yuichi, H.; Taiga, F.;
Hiromu, K.; Koji, S.; Xingguo, L.; Kosuke, N.; Tomokazu, T.; Yasuko, Y.; Hiroyuki,
A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5502; (c) Ihara, T.; Uemura, A.; Futamura, A.;
Shimizu, M.; Baba, N.; Nishizawa, S.; Teramae, N.; Jyo, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
131, 1386; (d) Li, V.; Geyer, R.; Tan, W. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, e52.
6. Shibata, A.; Abe, H.; Ito, M.; Kondo, Y.; Shimizu, S.; Akiyama, K.; Ito, Y. Chem.
Commun. 2009, 6586.
7. (a) Abe, H.; Kool, E. T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 263; (b) Sando, S.;
Kool, E. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2096.
8. Grossmann, T. N.; Seitz, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15596.
9. (a) Sando, S.; Narita, A.; Abe, K.; Aoyama, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5300;
(b) Narita, A.; Ogawa, K.; Sando, S.; Aoyama, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45,
2879.
10. (a) Nakayama, S.; Sintim, H. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10320; (b)
Kolpashchikov, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2934; (c) Xiao, Y.; Pavlov, V.;
Gill, R.; Bourenko, T.; Willner, I. ChemBioChem 2004, 5, 374.
11. Uzu, T.; Sasaki, S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4383.
4.4. UV–vis measurement
12. (a) Wegner, R.; Gottschaldt, M.; Gorls, H.; Jager, E. G.; Klemm, D. Chem. Eur. J.
2001, 7, 2143; (b) Wegner, R.; Gottschaldt, M.; Poppittz, W.; Jager, E. G.;
Klemm, D. J. Mol. Catal. 2003, 201, 93; (c) Wegner, R.; Gottschaldt, M.; Gorls, H.;
Jager, E. G.; Klemm, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 595.
13. Matsumoto, N.; Tsutsumi, T.; Ohyoshi, A.; Okawa, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1983,
56, 1386.
The solution of copper acetate (final concn 25 mM) was added
to the H3BO3–NaOH buffer (final concn 50 mM) in the presence
of ligand 2 (final concn 25 mM) at pH 9 or 12. The spectrum was
then obtained at 400–800 nm for the d–d band.
14. Bianke, G.; Chaurin, V.; Egorov, M.; Lebretpn, J.; Constacle, E.; Housecroft, C. E.;
Haner, R. Bioconjugate Chem. 2005, 17, 1441.
4.5. Chemiluminescence (CL) measurement
Method A for Figure 5: The reaction was initiated by the addition
of luminol sodium (final concn 25 lM) and ascorbic acid (final con-