2846
T. Hayashi et al.
LETTER
4.21 (br)
3.94 (dm, J = 11.8 Hz)
11.8
Acknowledgment
H
BnO
H
5.8, 17.1 Hz)
H 2.35 (dt, J =
X
4.68 (br) H
We thank Dr Matsumi Doe (Analytical Division, Osaka City Uni-
versity) for conducting the NMR experiments.
5.4
H
3.37 (dd, J = 11.8, 17.1 Hz)
H
X
F
5.44
(dd, J = 14.4, 5.4 Hz)
4g
References and Notes
X = SO2Ph
4.03 (m)
(1) (a) Fluorine in Medicinal Chemistry and Chemical Biology;
Ojima, I., Ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: West Sussex, 2009.
(b) Bégué, J. P.; Bonnet-Delpon, D. Bioorganic and
Medicinal Chemistry of Fluorine; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
2008.
3.78 (m)
H
12.2
MeO
H
H 2.56 (dd, J = 5.8, 17.1 Hz)
X
4.75 (dd, J = 5.8, 2.1 Hz)
5.8
H
H
2.33 (dd, J = 12.2, 17.1 Hz)
H
X
R
5.05 (d, J = 5.8 Hz)
(2) For recent reviews, see: (a) Kirk, K. L. J. Fluorine Chem.
2006, 127, 1013. (b) Purser, S.; Moore, P. R.; Swallow, S.;
Gouverneur, V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 320.
(c) Hagmann, W. K. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4359.
(3) Diels, O.; Alder, K. Ann. 1928, 460, 98.
9
X = SO2Ar, R = OTMS
Figure 2 Comparison of 1H NMR data of 4g and 9
(4) For a recent review on the pericyclic reactions of
fluoroorganic compounds, see: Lam, T. H.; Stanway, S. J.;
Gouverneur, V. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 9905.
(5) For recent examples of fluorinated dienophiles, see:
(a) Shastin, A. V.; Nenajdenko, V. G.; Muzalevskiy, V. M.;
Balenkova, E. S.; Fröhlich, R.; Haufe, G. Tetrahedron 2008,
64, 9725. (b) Saito, A.; Yanai, H.; Sakamoto, W.;
Takahashi, K.; Taguchi, T. J. Fluorine Chem. 2005, 126,
709.
(6) (a) Ibad, M. F.; Abid, O.-U.-R.; Nawaz, M.; Adeel, M.;
Villinger, A.; Langer, P. Synlett 2010, 195. (b) Paul, K.;
Hwang, J. H.; Choi, J. H.; Jeong, I. H. Org. Lett. 2009, 11,
4728. (c) Patrick, T. B.; Gorrell, K.; Rogers, J. J. Fluorine
Chem. 2007, 128, 710. (d) Pacheco, M.; Gouverneur, V.
Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1267. (e) Amii, H.; Kobayashi, T.;
Terasawa, H.; Uneyama, K. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3103.
(f) Kondo, K.; Cottens, S.; Schlosser, M. Chem. Lett. 1984,
13, 2149.
(7) (a) Danishefsky, S. J.; Kitahara, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974,
96, 7807. (b) Danishefsky, S. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14,
400.
(8) (a) Kerwin, J. F. Jr.; Danishefsky, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
1982, 23, 3739. (b) Josephsohn, N. S.; Snapper, M. L.;
Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4018.
(9) (a) Simonsen, K. B.; Svenstrup, N.; Roberson, M.;
Jorgensen, K. A. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 123.
The vinyl hydrogen of 4g was observed at d = 5.44. The
observed 3JHH coupling with the CHOBn proton (5.4 Hz)
indicates near co-planarity. The methine proton in
CHSO2Ph was observed at d = 3.94. The observed large
3JHH (11.8 Hz) coupling suggests that the methine proton
in CHSO2Ph is pseudoaxial. The phenylsulfonyl group is,
accordingly, pseudoequatorial. The NMR data of 4g are,
thus, consistent with those of 9, which indicates that the
exo adduct is the major product. Similarly, the structures
of 4h and 4i were determined as shown in Figure S1 in
Supporting Information. The NMR data of 4h and 4i are
consistent with those of the analogous adducts of the
Kitahara–Danishefsky’s diene with methyl acrylate.15
Dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate reacted with 1 to give 4j
in 93% yield, as determined by 19F NMR spectroscopy.
During purification of the preparative TLC, almost 50%
of 4j was converted to dimethyl 4-fluorophthalate (10)16
through an elimination of benzyl alcohol (entry 5).
This method was extended to the hetero Diels–Alder reac-
tion (entries 6 and 7). Diethyl diazodicarboxylate reacted
with 1 to give 4k in 90% yield. The reaction of 1 with bu-
tyl glyoxylate provided the corresponding cycloadducts 4l
and 4m in 84% yield as a 42:58 mixture of diastereomers.
The CHCO2n-Bu proton of 4m was observed at d = 4.68
(b) Motoyama, Y.; Koga, Y.; Nishiyama, H. Tetrahedron
2001, 57, 853.
(10) Paredes, E.; Biolatto, B.; Kneeteman, M.; Mancini, P. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8079.
3
(dd). The observed JHH coupling between the adjacent
methylene protons (4.2 Hz and 11.4 Hz) could be ex-
plained by an axial–equatorial coupling and a diaxial cou-
pling, which suggests that the CHCO2n-Bu proton is axial.
The NMR data of 4l and 4m are consistent with those of
the analogous compounds, cis- and trans-2-methoxy-5,6-
dihydro-a-pyran-6-carboxylic esters.17
(11) For diene formation resulting from b-elimination of the p-
allyl complex, see: (a) Bitar, A. Y.; Frontier, A. J. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 49. (b) Takenaka, H.; Ukaji, Y.; Inomata, K.
Chem. Lett. 2005, 34, 256. (c) Lee, K.-Y.; Kim, Y.-H.; Park,
M.-S.; Ham, W.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8129.
(d) Keinan, E.; Kumar, S.; Dangar, V.; Vaya, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 11151.
(12) Danishefsky, S. J.; Yan, C.-F.; Singh, R. K.; Gammill, R. B.;
McCurry, P. M. Jr.; Fritsch, N.; Clardy, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1979, 101, 7001.
(13) Garbisch, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 5561.
(14) (a) Cossu, S.; Delogu, G.; De Lucchi, O.; Fabbri, D.; Licini,
G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28, 766.
(b) De Lucchi, O.; Fabbri, D.; Cossu, S. J. Org. Chem. 1991,
56, 1888.
In summary, we have developed a novel approach for the
synthesis of an analogue of the fluorinated Kitahara–
Danishefsky’s diene via a Pd-catalyzed process. This nov-
el fluorine-containing diene reacted with various dieno-
philes to provide useful 1-fluorocyclohexene derivatives
in good yields. Further works to apply the present protocol
to fluorinated biomimetics are currently underway in our
laboratory.
(15) Quirante, J.; Vila, X.; Bonjoch, J. Synthesis 2001, 1971.
(16) Shi, G.-Q.; Cottens, S.; Shiba, S. A.; Schlosser, M.
Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 10569.
(17) Achmatowicz, O. Jr.; Jurczak, J.; Konowal, A.; Zamojski, A.
Org. Magn. Res. 1970, 2, 55.
Supporting Information for this article is available online at
Synlett 2010, No. 19, 2843–2846 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York