Koenigs-Knorr donors has been claimed in a patent.14
According to this procedure, a mixture of ferric chloride,
ferrous sulfate, ammonium peroxodisulfate, hydrogen
peroxide, and sodium azide is used for the conversion of
galactals to 2-azido galactosyl chlorides. All these proce-
dures suffer from specific problems such as low yields, the
requirement of a large reagent excess, and hazardous
reaction conditions.
We have developed a one-pot azidochlorination procedure
that uses few, nontoxic, and simple reagents in practically
stoichiometric amounts. The synthesis uses protected gly-
cals like, e.g., 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-galactal 1a as the star-
ting material and ferric chloride hexahydrate (0.8 equiv),
sodium azide (1.1 equiv), and hydrogen peroxide (1.1 equiv)
(Table 1) as reagents. The reaction is easily reproduced
on different reaction scales and provides high yields (up
to 78%).
The method was repeatedly applied up to 15.0 g of the
starting material giving reproducibly good yields of about
70% of the protected 2-azido galactosyl chloride 2a. The
crude mixture consisted of the R-anomer as the major
product (85-90%) and different byproducts in low amounts.
Minute amounts of the β-anomer could only be detected in
the samples after purification by SiO2 column chromato-
graphy. However, chromatographic purification is detri-
mental as it results in a considerable loss of material due to
hydrolysis and/or decomposition.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of a TN-Antigen Building Block
Table 1. Azidochlorination of 3,4,6-Tri-O-acetyl-D-galactal 1a
The crude azido chlorides can be used under typical
Koenigs-Knorr activation conditions to prepare glycosy-
lated amino acid building blocks or glyco conjugates
(Scheme 1).15 The azido derivative 2a was used to prepare
the glycosylated threonine building block 4. The yields and
diastereoselectivities of the threonine glycosylation are
comparable to those reported for the corresponding bro-
mide 3 obtained from an azidonitration reaction followed
by bromination.9,18
We have furthermore subjected a series of differently
protected galactals and other glycals to the reaction con-
ditions to explore the scope of method. Generally, other
protecting groups of the benzyl, benzoyl, and silyl type are
also tolerated in glycals (Table 2). However, it must be
stated that incomplete conversion occurred in the case of
glucal derivative 5 and the galactal 1d. Adding larger
amounts of reagents did not improve the results. Instead,
larger amounts of byproduct were formed.
In particular, the high yields in the case of the protected
disaccharide glycals 7 have to be stressed as they represent
precursors of the T-antigen moiety.7 The protected galac-
tal 7a was completely converted to a yield of 69% of the
corresponding 2-azido galactal 8a without significant am-
ounts of byproduct. Notably, one hydroxyl group was un-
protected. Likewise, the peracetylated galactal 7b gave
78% of crude chloride 8b. As for the azido chloride 2a,
the crude material could be used in subsequent reactions
without purification.
molar ratio
FeCl3 H2O/NaN3/H2O2
conditions
yielda
3
3.0/2.0/2.0
1.1/1.1/1.5
0.8/1.2/1.5
0.8/1.1/1.1
0.8/1.2/1.5
0.8/1.2/1.5
CH3CN, -30 °C, 3 h
CH3CN, -30 °C, 3 h
CH3CN, -30 °C, 7 h
CH3CN, -20 °C, 7 h
CH3CN, 0 °C, 6 h
78%
71%
74%
70%
62%
-
CH3CN, rt, 16 h
a Unpurified product. Yield determined by 1H NMR after complete
conversion of starting material.
Variation of the reaction conditions revealed that
larger amounts of the reagents do not distinctly influ-
ence the reaction time and the yield. Strikingly, no
reaction occurred at room temperature, while the reac-
tion proceeded smoothly at 0 °C with a slightly reduced
yield compared to the reaction at -30 °C. Acetonitrile is
the solvent of choice, as all reagents are dissolved at the
chosen concentration. Stirring and subsequent workup
of the homogeneous reaction is clearly facilitated com-
pared to working with a suspension. No conversion was
observed in THF, dioxane, and methylene chloride.
Moreover, the yields are not improved under strictly
anhydrous reaction conditions. Large amounts of inor-
ganic salts are employed in the literature procedures of
azidonitration and azidochlorination and have to be
removed in the workup.9,14 In contrast, our protocol
only employs stoichiometric amounts or a slight excess
of the inorganic components which can be easily re-
moved by aqueous workup.
(15) Paulsen, H.; Adermann, K. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1989, 751–769.
(16) Park, M. H.; Takeda, R.; Nakanishi, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987,
28, 3823–3824.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(17) Padron, J. I.; Vazquez, J. T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6,
857–858.
(18) Broddefalk, J.; Nilsson, U.; Kihlberg, J. J. Carbohydr. Chem.
1994, 13, 129–132.
(14) Naicker, S.; Noujaim, A. Patent US4935503, 1990.
546
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 4, 2011