molybdenum MAP complexes suggest that methylidene
intermediates can be relatively stable and long-lived.6
Accordingly, if both Mo and W MAP methylidene species
are long-lived in the appropriate circumstances, higher
turnover numbers should be obtained.
Table 1. Enyne Metathesis of 1 with Mo- and W-based MAP
Catalystsa
Scheme 1. Various Modes of Reaction in Enyne RCM
a Reactions were performed under N2 atmosphere with 5 mol %
catalyst in C6H6 at 22 °C. b Conv was based on consumption of
substrate. c Ratios were determined by analysis of 1H NMR spectra of
unpurified reaction mixtures.
We began by examining enyne metathesis by Mo- and
W-catalysts of tosylamide 1 (Table 1). We found that a
W-based catalyst provides levels of selectivity and reactiv-
ity at least as high as the analogous Mo-based variant.
Table 2. More Efficient and Selective Enyne Metathesis with
W-based Catalystsa
One property of Mo-MAP complexes is their ability to
catalyze enyne metathesis reactions to give endo products
preferentially (Scheme 1);7 such cyclic dienes are virtually
inaccessible through enyne reactions catalyzed by Ru
carbenes.8 Although some enyne reactions catalyzed by
Ru complexes have been proposed to follow a mechanism
in which the olefin binds to the metal first (Scheme 1), we
have suggested that the endo product v is generated when
the terminal alkyne binds initially to Mo, affording a β-
metallacyclobutane intermediate iii. Conversely, the exo
product ix is formed through the intermediate R-metalla-
cyclobutane vii. Mixtures of endo- and exo-products form
through the competitive reaction pathways shown in
Scheme 1. One of the limitations in enyne metathesis by
Mo-based MAP complexes might arise from multiple
reactions that involve a terminal acetylene (i.e., oligomer-
ization or polymerization).9 The yields and purity of enyne
metathesis products prepared through the use of Mo
catalysts therefore can be limited. As a consequence of
the superior selectivity of tungsten catalysts for Z-selective
homocoupling of terminal olefins, presumably as a result
of the better-controlled reactivity of W-complexes,5 we felt
compelled to explore the ability of such complexes in
promoting enyne RCM reactions.
a-c See Table 1.
Encouragedby these results, weturned tosubstrates that
undergo facile oligomerization in the presence of Mo-
catalysts. As the data in Table 2 illustrate, in the case of
enyne metathesis of 4, where a medium ring is generated,
and of 6, where the rate of ring-closure is slower, presum-
ably as a consequence of increased substitution at the
alkene, relatively high dilution conditions proved to be
necessary for Mo-catalyzed processes (1 ꢀ 10-3 and 2 ꢀ
10-3 M, respectively).7b When the reactions were carried
out at a concentration of 0.01 M, <40% enyne metathesis
products were obtained with the Mo-F6 complex
(Table 1) and separation of the desired product from
oligomeric side products proved difficult (Table 2).
€
(6) (a) Jiang, A. J.; Simpson, J. H.; Muller, P.; Schrock, R. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7770–7780. (b) Schrock, R. R.; King, A. J.;
€
Marinescu, S. C.; Simpson, J. H.; Muller, P. Organometallics 2010, 29,
5241–5251.
€
(7) (a) Singh, R.; Schrock, R. R.; Muller, P.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12654–12655. (b) Lee, Y.-J.; Schrock, R. R.;
Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10652–10661.
(8) Diver, S. T.; Giessert, A. J. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1317–1382.
(9) (a) Schrock, R. R. In Metathesis Polymerization of Olefins and
Polymerization of Alkynes; Imamoglu, Y., Ed.; Kluwer: Norwell, MA,
1998; p 357. (b) Schrock, R. R.; Luo, S.; Lee, J. C., Jr.; Zanetti, N. C.;
Davis, W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3883–3895. (c) Fox, H. H.;
Schrock, R. R. Organometallics 1992, 11, 2763–2765.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 4, 2011
785