Journal of the American Chemical Society
COMMUNICATION
Table 3. Survey of Propargyl Alcohol Scope in Dual Catalysis
of the scope and mechanism of this contemporaneous dual
catalysis are in progress.
’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S
Supporting Information. Complete experimental details
b
and characterization of new products. This material is available
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank the NSF (CHE 0948222) for financial support of
this project. X.L. is grateful for a Swiss National Science
Foundation postdoctoral fellowship.
’ REFERENCES
(1) Hartwig, J. F. Organotransition Metal Chemistry: From Bonding to
Catalysis; University Science Books: Mill Valley, CA, 2010.
(2) Organocatalysis; Reetz, M. T., List, B., Jaroch, S., Weinmann, H.,
Eds.; Springer: Berlin, 2008.
(3) Masel, R. I. Chemical Kinetics and Catalysis; Wiley: New York,
2001.
(4) (a) Sammis, G. M.; Danjo, H.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 9928. (b) Ibrahem, I.; Cꢀordova, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 1952. (c) Mukherjee, S.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
11336. (d) Nicewicz, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Science 2008, 322, 77.
(e) Ikeda, M.; Miyake, Y.; Nishibayashi, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010,
49, 7289.
(5) (a) Lee, J. M.; Na, Y.; Han, H.; Chang, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004,
33, 302. (b) Shibasaki, M.; Kanai, M.; Matsunaga, S.; Kumagai, N. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1117.
a Run for 48 h. b Using 1.5 mol % Pd2(dba)3 CHCl3, 3.6 mol % DPPM,
3
and 4.5 mol % OdV(OSiPh3)3. c tert-Butyl cinnamyl carbonate was used
instead of 8. d The reaction used 1.5 equiv of propargyl alcohol and was
run at 100 °C for 48 h.
are affected not only by the catalyst loading but also by the ratio
of the two catalysts with respect to each other. To highlight the
importance of the proper [V]/[Pd] ratio, we conducted several
experiments that demonstrate its impact. For example, when
catalyst loading ([V]/[Pd]) was increased from 4.5/3.0 mol % to
5.0/5.0 mol % while maintaining other conditions constant for
entry 7 in Table 2, the yield of desired product was increased to
97% (vs 88%) without erosion of stereoselectivity. When only
the palladium catalyst loading was increased from 1.0 to 2.0 mol %
for entry 3 in Table 3, the yield of desired product was dramatically
decreased (<5 vs 67%), whereas the O-allylated product was
obtained in 83% yield. When only the vanadium catalyst loading
was decreased from 4.5 to 3.0 mol % for entry 5 in Table 3, the yield
of desired product was significantly increased to 87% (vs 78%)
without decrease of stereoselectivity. These examples demonstrate
the important nature of the relative catalyst loadings and the poten-
tial to further optimize individual reactions.
In conclusion, we have established the feasibility of coupling
two highly reactive catalytic intermediates while omitting the
competing side reactions with stoichiometric reagents. This
transformation was achieved through the use of a combination
of a vanadium-catalyzed 1,3-transposition of propargylic alcohols
and a palladium-catalyzed alkylation of allylic carbonates. To our
knowledge, this is the first example of trapping a catalytic amount
of a highly reactive metal intermediate with a second catalytically
generated metal intermediate in the presence of stoichiometric
amounts of competitive reagents. We anticipate that this new
tactic will provide access to a wide range of new chemical
processes for generating important compounds. Further studies
(6) (a) Trost, B. M.; Van Vranken, D. L. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 395.
(b) Trost, B. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 695.
(7) Trost, B. M.; Fandrick, D. R. Aldrichimica Acta 2007, 40, 59.
(8) (a) Trost, B. M.; Oi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1230. (b)
Trost, B. M.; Chung, C. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10358.
(9) It is interesting to note the superiority of DPPM, which
traditionally has not been used as a ligand for allylic alkylation.
(10) Pauling, H.; Andrews, D. A.; Hindley, N. C. Helv. Chem. Acta
1976, 59, 1233.
(11) Haight, A. R.; Stoner, E. J.; Peterson, M. J.; Grover, V. K. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 8092.
(12) Iwasawa, N.; Maeyama, K.; Saitou, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 1486.
ꢀ
(13) Sanz, R.; Martínez, A.; Alvarez-Gutiꢀerrez, J. M.; Rodríguez, F.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 1383.
(14) This result represents the first example of dual catalysis where
two reactive intermediates generated irreversibly in situ react with each
other in the presence of large excesses of competing reagents. It is
important to note that the previous examples of dual catalysis have
employed a catalytically generated enamine intermediate that is formed
reversibly and is much more stable under the reaction conditions in
comparison with our case, where the protonation of the vanadium-
allenoate is much more facile and irreversible (see ref 4.)
(15) Carey, F. A.; Sundberg, R. J. Advanced Organic Chemistry, 5th
ed.; Springer: New York, 2007.
(16) (a) Frank, S. A.; Mergott, D. J.; Roush, W. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 2404. (b) Jellerichs, B. G.; Kong, J. R.; Krische, M. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7758.
1709
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja110501v |J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1706–1709