Scheme 4
Scheme 5
alkene moiety could slow down the rate to a level that
would make it synthetically useless.
We were indeed relieved when exposure of xanthate 35b
derived from ketone 33 gave rise to the desired epimeric
mixture of bicyclic product 36a,b following the usual
reduction step (Scheme 4), albeit in a slightly reduced
overall yield (69%). The ring-opening process to regener-
ate the methyl ketone side chain in 37 proceeded normally.
The xanthate in the cyclized product may be readily
converted intonumerousother sulfur groups possessing an
exceptionally rich chemistry.12 Alternatively, another
radical carbon-carbon bond forming process may be per-
formed, before the cutting of the linking chain. Two such
transformations are displayed in Scheme 5. The first
concerns addition of xanthate 23a,b, prepared above as
an epimeric mixture, to allyl trimethylsilane to give deriv-
ative 38, where both the xanthate and the trimethylsilyl
groups may be eliminated by treatment with tetrabutylam-
monium fluoride.13 In this manner, epimeric allyl derivative
39a,b was obtained in 64% overall yield from 6b without
isolation of the intermediates. It could be cleaved by the
abnormal Beckmann rearrangement to furnish 40 cleanly.
While the addition to allyl trimethylsilane represents a
convenient method for introducing an allyl group, numer-
ous other side chains bearing diverse functionalities can be
attached by simply using the corresponding alkene trap.
For example, the separable 1:1 epimeric mixture of bicyclic
compound 41a,b was produced in 50% overall yield from
6b, without isolation of the intermediates, by cyclization,
intermolecular addition to the diethyl acetal of acrolein,
and reductive removal of the xanthate. Cleavage of the
linking chain furnished 42 (70%). The presence of the
masked aldehyde should allow the swift construction of
trans-decalin 43 through deprotection and condensation
of the liberated aldehyde with the acetonitrile side chain.14
It is worth emphasizing that in both products, 40 and 42,
b reacted to give keto acid 25 in 73% yield, while the other
remained unscathed under the usual reaction conditions.
No attempt to use forcing conditions were made, as our
aim was to establish a sequence that would be as mild as
possible. An alternative approach was to perform the scission
by way of an abnormal Beckmann rearrangement.10 To
this end, the epimeric mixture of ketone 24a,b was con-
verted into oxime 26, which was treated with mesyl chlo-
ride in pyridine to give keto nitrile 27 in an 80% overall
yield. The methyl ketone side chain in the starting cyclo-
hexene 5 could thus be used to introduce a cyanomethyl
substituent, while controlling the relative stereochemistry
of two new chiral centers in 27.
The same sequence was applied to the more complex
myrcene derived methyl ketone 28 (Scheme 4). Compound
31a,b, obtained equally efficiently as a separable epimeric
mixture, was cleanly converted into ketone 32 by the same
modified Beckman rearrangement (Scheme 4). Having
established the feasibility of this strategy for the transmis-
sion of chirality, we examined some further extensions.
One important question concerned the possibility of
stereoselectively creating a quaternary center. Placing a
substituent on the alkene terminus where the radical
addition is to take place slows down considerably the rate
of cyclization. For instance, the 5-exo-cyclization of the
5-methyl-5-hexen-1-yl radical is about 40 times slower than
that of the parent 5-hexen-1-yl radical.11 In the case of the
already sluggish 6-exo-cyclization, the substitution on the
(10) (a) Singhal, G. M.; Das, N. B.; Sharma, R. P. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1990, 498. (b) Mulijiani, Z.; Desmukh, A. R. A. S.;
Gadre, S. R.; Joshi, V. S. Synth. Commun. 1987, 17, 25. (c) Forrester,
A. R.; Irikawa, H.; Thomson, R. H.; Woo, S.-O.; King, T. J. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1981, 1712. (d) Yates, P.; Wong, J.; McLean, S.
Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 3357. (e) Wakamatsu, T.; Fukui, M.; Ban, Y.
Synthesis 1976, 341. (f) Shoppee, C. W.; Ram, P.; Roy, S. K. J. Chem.
Soc. (C) 1966, 1023. Shoppee, C. W.; Roy, S. K. J. Chem. Soc. 1963,
3774.
(12) Zard, S. Z. In Handbook of RAFT Polymerization; Barner-
Kowollik, C., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2008; pp 151-187.
(13) Briggs, M. E.; Zard, S. Z. Synlett 2005, 334.
(11) (a) Beckwith, A. L. J.; Easton, C. J.; Serelis, A. K. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1980, 482. (b) Beckwith, A. L. J.; Blair, A. I.; Phillipou,
G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 2251.
(14) It is interesting to note in this respect that ozonolysis of the olefin
in compound 32 would also give a propionaldehyde side chain that could
condense with the acetonitrile moiety, but this time to give a cis-decalin.
1232
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 5, 2011