The R- alcohol of 10 was inverted in the process of
installing the tertiary bromide. Thus, mesylation of the
secondary alcohol of 10 and ring closure with K2CO3
cleanly afforded epoxide 11. Saponification at the optimal
temperature of 65 °C cleanly afforded acid 12 without
harming the epoxide. There was precedent suggesting that
Scheme 3. Transannular Cyclization of 4
MgBr2 Et2O would open the epoxide of 12regioselectively
3
to give tertiary bromide 13.6 However, we anticipated
competing polyene cyclizations upon Lewis acid activation
of the epoxide.7 Indeed, addition of a full equivalent of
Bu4NBr was necessary to suppress polyene cyclizations;
presumably bromide in high concentrations can compete
with intramolecular alkene attack on the activated epox-
ide. Under these conditions, we could obtain bromohydrin
13 in good yield and regioselectivity.
Despite the hindered nature of the secondary neopentyl
alcohol of 13 and the observed base sensitivity of its vicinal
bromohydrin,8 Shiina macrolactonization9 proceeded in
high yield.10 The resulting macrocycle 5 crystallized during
storage at -20 °C, and X-ray crystal structure determina-
tion confirmed its S- absolute configuration.11
With facile access to hundreds of milligrams of 5, we
investigated bromonium-initiated transannular cycliza-
tion (Scheme 3). After significant experimentation,12 we
found that 1.1 equiv of Snyder’s recently reported reagent
14 (bromodiethylsulfonium bromopentachloroantimo-
nate, BDSB)13 in 1 M LiClO4/Et2O14 afforded a 19%
combined isolated yield of the desired products 7 and 15.
NMR and LC analysis of the crude product showed ittobe
a ∼9:3:2:1 mixture of 16:7:15:17. The major product, 16,
however, invariably decomposed during normal and re-
versed-phase chromatography. Because we suspected 16
was an allylic bromide, we selectively solvolyzed it by
treatment of the crude product mixture with methanol.
From the solvolyzed mixture we isolated and identified
five compounds: 7 and 15, as well as moderately stable
allylic bromide 17 and 32% of 18a/b, the two major new
compounds produced during methanolysis. Sincewe could
not characterize 16 as a pure compound, its structure is
tentatively assigned based on its known conversion to 18a/
b. The reaction of 5 with 14 evidently proceeds primarily
through bromonium intermediate 19 (Scheme 3). Likely
due to geometry, attack on this bromonium by the alkene
(black arrow) is not fast enough to compete with loss of a
proton from either of two positions (red or blue arrow),
giving rise to 16 and 17. The superiority of 14 compared
with brominating reagents such as NBS is likely due to the
absence of any basic leaving group that could accelerate
processes leading to 16 and 17.15 In the bromonium
polyene cyclization literature,16 low yields are typical,
likely due to the prevalence of deprotonation, although
14 has been shown to improve yields in unconstrained
systems.13
Careful NMR analysis confirmed our assignment of
structure 7. It was easily distinguished from regioisomeric
structure 70 (see Scheme 1) based on HMBC correlations.17
It was more difficult to rule out the possibility of diastereo-
meric structure 700, in which the configuration of the cyclo-
hexane ring is reversed relative to the ester stereocenter
(Scheme 4). MMFF-based Monte Carlo conformational
(4) Ligand 9: (a) Corey, E. J.; Noe, M. C.; Lin, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1995, 36, 8741–8744. A related ligand: (b) Corey, E. J.; Zhang, J. Org.
Lett. 2001, 3, 3211–3214.
(5) Determined by Mosher ester analysis (see Supporting Informa-
tion).
(6) Morimoto, Y.; Okita, T.; Takaishi, M.; Tanaka, T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1132–1135.
(7) Yoder, R. A.; Johnston, J. N. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 4730–4756.
(8) The bromohydrin derived from ester 11 could not be converted to
acid 13, due to multiple side reactions under a variety of basic and Lewis
acidic ester cleavage conditions.
(9) (a) Shiina, I.; Fukui, H.; Sasaki, A. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2312–
2317. (b) Shiina, I.; Kubota, M.; Oshiumi, H.; Hashizume, M. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 1822–1830.
(10) Slow addition of substrate (48 h) and elevated temperature
(50 °C) were critical in order to ensure that the seco acid was consumed
faster than it was added, preventing diolide formation. These conditions
were robust on a scale of several hundered milligrams.
(11) See Supporting Information.
(12) Other reagents employed included NBS, NBS/acids, NBS/phos-
phines, and TBCHD (2,4,4,6-tetrabromocyclohexadienone).
(13) (a) Snyder, S. A.; Treitler, D. S.; Brucks, A. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 14303–14314. (b) Snyder, S. A.; Treitler, D. S. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7899–7903.
(14) We presume this highly polar solvent mixture to be helpful in
prolonging the life of the cationic intermediate 19 long enough for the
slow cyclization step to occur. Potentially, this solvent may also promote
a compact and more cyclization-prone conformation of 19 via hydro-
phobic effects.
(15) The pKa of the conjugate acid of dimethylsulfide is -5 (see:
Arnett, E. M. Prog. Phys. Org. Chem. 1963, 1, 223–403), making it far
less basic than leaving groups derived from other bromonium sources. A
reviewer has suggested that BDSB may generally give cleaner reactions
because its high reactivity allows the use of lower temperatures.
1224
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 5, 2011