Scheme 3. Biaryl Synthesis via Polyketide Condensation
Figure 2. X-ray structure of biaryl acid 20.
coupling partner, boronic ester 13,5 was obtained from
trihydroxybenzoic acid 12 in four steps following a known
protocol.6 Linkage of these two components through Suzuki
coupling required careful optimization. Eventually, we
settled on a protocol that involved microwave irradiation
and tetrakis(triphenylphosphine) palladium(0) as a catalyst.
Under these conditions, 11 could be coupled with 13 to
afford 14 as a racemic mixture of atropisomers (Scheme 2).
This is one of the few examples where a 3-fold o,o,o0-
substituted biaryl bond has been formed in acceptable yield
through transition-metal mediated cross-coupling.7
Although we were able to find a satisfactory solution for
the cross-coupling, we nevertheless felt that the pathway
taken was too long to support a total synthesis of A-74528
(1). Therefore, we explored an alternative pathway that
involves condensation chemistry and is also more biomi-
metic. It starts with the deprotonation of orsellinic acid
derivative 15, easily available on a large scale through
trimerization of methyl acetoacetate.8 Condensation of the
corresponding organolithium compound with Weinreb
amide 169 gave ketone 17. Upon treatment with DBU,
this material underwent enolization and intramolecular
condensation to afford isocoumarin 18, which has the
characteristics of an active ester. Indeed, 18 engaged in
another Claisen-type condensation with the anion of 15 to
afford aryl benzyl ketone 19. This material underwent cycli-
zation upon workup to yield a mixture of acid 20 and its
corresponding methyl ester (not shown). Saponification of
this mixture provided the carboxylic acid 20 in 70% overall
yield. The X-ray structure of this compound is shown in
Figure 2.5 Treatment of 20 with oxalyl chloride in the pre-
sence of a base then gave phenolic δ-lactone 21 (Scheme 3).
Next, we explored the installation of a side chain corre-
sponding to C24-C30 of the natural product. The solution
we eventually found is remarkable for its simplicity. The
achiraltetracyclic lactone 21, which functionslike anactive
ester, couldbelinked with the potassiumenolateofmethyl-
1-propenyl ketone 22 to furnish the 1,3-diketone 23, which
mostly exists in its enolized form. It should be noted that,
due to hindered rotation around the biaryl bond, this
compound is chiral and is formed as a racemate. An
analogous transformation could be carried out with the
enolate of the enantiomerically enriched epoxy ketone 24,
whose synthesis is also shown in Scheme 4.10 It involves the
oxidation of the known sorbitol monoepoxide 26 to 27
followed by the addition of methyl lithium and another
oxidation. Condensation of the potassium enolate of
ketone 24 with 21 gave aryl naphthol 25 as an inseparable
1:1 mixture of diastereomers with respect to the biaryl axis
(Scheme 4). Apparently, the stereogenic centers of the
epoxide moiety are too far away to effect dynamic kinetic
resolution and induce diastereoselectivity in the ring-open-
ing reaction.11
With 23 and 25 in hand, we began to explore the
projected key cyclizations toward the core of A-74528 (1)
(Scheme 5). Thus far, our efforts have been met with
limited success. Nevertheless, some interesting results have
been obtained. For instance, treatment of the diketone
(6) (a) Danishefsky, S. J.; Dushin, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
655–659. (b) Takahashi, S.; Kamisuki, S.; Kobayashi, S.; Sugawara, F.
€
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 5695–5700. (c) Altenmoller, M.; Podlech, J.;
Fenske, D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 1678–1684.
(7) For sterically hindered biaryl couplings, see: Tang, T.; Capacci,
A. G.; Wei, X.; Li, W.; White, A.; Patel, N. D.; Savoie, J.; Goa, J. J.;
Rodriguez, S.; Qu, B.; Haddad, N.; Lu, B. Z.; Krishnamurthy, D.; Yee,
N. K.; Senayake, C. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5879–5883 and
references therein.
(8) (a) Chiarello, J.; Joullie, M. M. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 41–48. (b)
Pulgarin, C.; Gunzinger, J.; Tabacchi, R. Helv. Chim. Acta 1985, 68,
1948–1951.
(10) Anson, C. E.; Dave, G.; Stephenson, G. R. Tetrahedron 2000, 56,
2273–2281.
(11) (a) Bringmann, G.; Vitt, D. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7674–7681.
(b) Bringmann, G.; Price Mortimer, A. J.; Keller, P. A.; Gresser, M. J.;
Garner, J.; Breuning, M. Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 5518–5563. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5384–5427.
(9) Williams, R. M.; Ehrlich, P. P.; Zhai, W.; Hendrix, J. J. Org.
Chem. 1987, 52, 2615–2617.
1388
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 6, 2011