Information). The desired product was obtained in almost
quantitative yield and g selectivity, with an excellent e.r. value
of 97:3 using 5 mol% of the catalyst. In line with previous
studies,[11] the E/Z geometry of the starting dienolate had only
a small influence on the stereochemical outcome of the
reaction as shown in control experiments with the chromato-
graphically separated geometrical isomers of 3a (see the
Supporting Information), and therefore 3a was used as a
mixture.
Next, we also explored other nucleophiles (see Table 1).
Studying the influence of the silyl group and the ester
substituent in nucleophiles 3b–3 f revealed that the silyl group
had only a small influence on the reaction outcome, while the
ester substituent proved to be important in terms of reactivity.
The methyl ester showed high reactivity and delivered
products in high yields, while increasing the ester bulkiness,
for example, with a tert-butyl group, significantly reduced the
yields (Table 1, entries 4–6).
The introduction of substituents, such as in nucleophiles
3g–3i, revealed that a substituent in the b position is well
tolerated (Table 1, entries 7 and 9). A substituent in the
a position furnished the product with somewhat decreased
enantioselectivity (Table 1, entry 8), a trend that comple-
ments the Denmark approach, where a substituents are
better tolerated than b substituents.[10b] Ketene acetal 3i, a
preferred and especially reactive substrate in previous
studies,[5] also gave the product with decreased enantioselec-
tivity.
The reaction of nucleophile 3a with different aldehydes
was also explored (Table 2). In general, electron-rich or
-neutral aromatic aldehydes provide superior results, but
electron-poor aromatic substrates still enable the reaction to
occur with promising enantioselectivities and yields for
products not accessible by previous methods. Branched and
unbranched aliphatic aldehydes can be utilized as well;
however, the products are obtained with lower enantioselec-
tivities and yields.
Table 1: Nucleophile scope of the disulfonimide-catalyzed vinylogous
Mukaiyama aldol reaction.[a]
After demonstrating the suitability of our catalytic system
for asymmetric vinylogous Mukaiyama aldol reactions, we
turned our focus on the previously unexplored bisvinylogous
version. The products that are potentially accessible by this
method can otherwise only be synthesized directly by using
aluminum-mediated mixed crossed aldol condensations of
aldehydes with conjugated esters, as shown by Yamamoto and
co-workers.[12] The required ketene acetal nucleophiles 4 are
easily accessible as E/Z mixtures from inexpensive sorbic acid
derivatives, which are naturally occurring bulk chemicals.[13]
We were pleased to find that compound 4a reacted
smoothly under the same reaction conditions evaluated for its
congener 3a with various aldehydes in good conversions and
high enantioselectivity (Table 3). To the best of our knowl-
edge, this is the first report of a regio-, highly enantio-, and
e-selective vinylogous Mukaiyama aldol reaction of double
vinylogous silyl ketene acetals with aldehydes.
Entry
1
Product
Yield [%]
96
e.r.[b]
97:3[c]
2
3
4
5
6
7
67[d]
73
96:4
95:5
96:4
95:5
94:6
94:6
71
61[e]
30[e]
60[d]
As predicted by our DFT calculations, the terminal,
e selectivity proved to be less distinct in these transforma-
tions. For example, product 6a was obtained in a e/a ratio of
5:1. The g product remained entirely undetectable as proven
1
spectroscopically by analyses of the H, 13C, DEPT-135, and
1H-1H-COSY spectra (see the Supporting Information). The
data also confirmed an all-E-configuration of e product 6a.
While pronounced structural and electronic variations of the
aldehyde were tolerated, the moderate e/a ratio proved to be
true for other substrates as well, thus diminishing the yields of
the isolated products somewhat.
8
9
78
80
81:19
92:8[f]
Our catalyst system was particularly suited for aromatic
and cinnamaldehyde derivatives, with the desired products
obtained in high enantioselectivities and good yields. Ali-
phatic aldehydes, such as pivaldehyde, could be used, which
led to the product with promising regioselectivity and yield,
but poor enantioselectivity. The introduction of a methyl
group to the silyl enol ether, as in nucleophile 4b (Table 3,
entries 10 and 11) gave products with good enantioselectivites
but somewhat lower yields.
[a] Typical reaction conditions: 0.2 mmol of aldehyde, 0.3 mmol of
corresponding nucleophile 3, and 5 mol% of 1 were stirred in Et2O
[0.2m] for 3 days at À788C; the yields refer to isolated products.
[b] Determined by HPLC on a chiral stationary phase. [c] g/a ratio >50:1
determined by GC-MS analysis. [d] In these cases small amounts of side
product evident by TLC led to decreased yields of the isolated product.
[e] Starting material recovered. [f] The absolute stereochemistry of 5i
was assigned by optical rotation measurements and comparison with
literature values. The other compounds were assigned following analogy
(see the Supporting Information). TIPS=triisopropylsilyl.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 754 –758
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
755