increased conjugation, while keeping steric constraints at a
minimum.8 The [1,2,5]thiadiazolo[3,4]quinoxaline (TQ) mo-
lecule is an o-quinoid acceptor unit featuring outstanding
electron affinity and has been used in the construction of low
band gap semiconducting polymers.9 So far, TQ derivatives
were reported in conjugation with neighboring thiophene
units at positions 4 and 9.10
Scheme 2. Synthesis of TQ Derivatives 7a, 8a-c, and 9a
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 4,9-Dibromo-6,7 bis(aryl)-[1,2,5]-
thiadiazolo[3,4-g]quinoxaline
Herein, we report the synthesis and characterization of
new TQ oligomers with neighboring ethynyl and vinyl
spacers. The changes in the optical and electrochemical
behavior originating from the difference in the donor
strength of the substituents at positions 6 and 7 on the
TQ unit, as well as in the nature of π-spacers (ethynyl vs.
vinyl) in the co-oligomers (at positions 4 and 9), are
reported (Figure S1, Supporting Information, SI).
that, after the coupling reaction was completed, the palla-
dium catalyst acted as a hydrogen-transfer catalyst, redu-
cing the triple bond. The hydrogen source might be the
diisopropylammonium salt, resulting from the deprotona-
tion of the terminal acetylene. The presumed Pd-catalyzed
hydrogenation might be facilitated by the strong electron-
withdrawing nature of the TQ core.14
First, the influcence of the substituents directly con-
nected to the TQ core, at positions 6 and 7, was evalua-
ted (Table 1). Compound 6a, carrying phenyl moieties,
showed an absorption maximum at 440 nm and an emis-
sion maximum at 546 nm (Figure S2, SI). Replacing the
phenyl substituents by thiophene (6b) enhanced the D-A
interactions, lowering the optical energy gap (Eop). This
was reflected in red shifts of the absoption and emission
maxima in solution. To determine the electrochemical
properties of the compounds, cyclic voltammetry (CV)
experiments were performed and the first reduction peak
potentials (ERed) relative to ferrocene were measured
(Figure S3, SI). The CV measurements revealed that both
compounds presented similar ELUMO (Table 1) suggesting
that, by the introduction of stronger donor units at posi-
tions 6 and 7, the high electron affinity of the molecule was
preserved.
Diketones 2 and 4 were obtained from the commercially
available dodecylbenzene or octylthiophene under Frie-
del-Crafts reaction conditions in 56% and 72% yield,
respectively.11 The condensation of 512,9b with diketone 2
or 4 was conducted in acetic acid (AcOH), under micro-
wave (MW) irradiation (Scheme 1). Compounds 6a and 6b
were isolated as orange (6a, 72% yield) and red (6b, 54%
yield) precipitates.
Performing the well-established one-pot consecutive
Sonogashira-Hagihara13 cross-couplingreaction between
6a,b and thecorrespondingaromaticterminalalkyneled to
the formation of 7-9a (77-82% yield) in only 15 min
(Scheme 2). Trying to increase the yield of 8a by extending
the reaction time of 6a and 2-ethynylthiophene resulted in
the formation of 8b and 8c, respectively. The highest yields
for 8b (16% yield) and 8c (12% yield) were obtained after
12 h, whereas neither 6b nor 8a was left in the reaction
mixture. The hydrogenation of the alkyne 8a indicated
(9) (a) Kitamura, C.; Tanaka, S.; Yamashita, Y. Chem. Mater. 1996,
€
8, 570. (b) Cai, T.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, E.; Hellstrom, S.; Zhang, F.; Xu, S.;
€
Inganas, O.; Andersson, M. R. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2010, 94,
1275.
€
(10) (a) Wang, E.; Hou, L.; Wang, Z.; Hellstrom, S.; Mammo, W.;
€
Zhang, F.; Inganas, O.; Andersson, M. R. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4470. (b)
Li, H.; Tam, T. L.; Lam, Y. M.; Mhaisalkar, S. G.; Grimsdale, A. C.
Second, the photophysical properties of 7a, 8a, and 9a
(Figure 1, Table 1) could be tuned by varying the donor
strength connected via acetylenic spacers at the 4 and 9
positions.
Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 46.
(11) Belen’kii, L. I.; Shirinyan, V. Z.; Gromova, G. P.; Kolotaev,
A. V.; Strelenko, Y. A.; Tandura, S. N.; Shumskii, A. N.; Krayushkin,
M. M. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2003, 39, 1570.
(12) (a) Tsubata, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Yamashita, Y.; Mukai, T.; Miyashi,
T. Heterocycles 1992, 33, 337. (b) Tam, T. L.; Li, H.; Wei, F.; Tan, K. J.;
Kloc, C.; Lam, Y. M.; Mhaisalkar, S. G.; Grimsdale, A. C. Org. Lett.
2010, 12, 3340.
(14) (a) Raebiger, J. W.; Miedaner, A.; Curtis, C. J.; Miller, S. M.;
Anderson, O. P.; DuBois, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5502. (b)
Hierso, J. C.; Picquet, M.; Cattey, H.; Meunier, P. Synlett 2006, 18, 3005.
(13) Tohda, Y.; Sonogashira, K.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett.
1975, 16, 4467.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 8, 2011
1937