C. S. Elmore and P. N. Dorff
R
O
R
O
N
R'
N
R'
EtMgBr, THF
Ph3SiCl
65%
Br
14CH
14C
2
14C
14C
Ph3Si
Ca14C2
Ph3Si
CuI, NEt3 MeCN,
Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, H2
1
40%
SiPh3
n-Bu4NF,
THF
14C
14C
14C
14C
Ph3Si
85%
n-BuLi, THF
Ph3SiCl
75%
SiPh3
14C
14C
Ph3Si
Scheme 2. Synthesis of isoindolone 1 from Ca14C2.
prepare it from C-14 acetylene; however, after verifying that was not removed during silica gel chromatography interfered
triphenylsilylacetylene (TPSA) was also an effective coupling with the reaction. The use of MeCN as solvent gave a higher
partner, it was decided to target that alkyne instead to reduce yield than the use of a amine solvent such as diisopropylamine.
the volatility of the C-14-labeled intermediate.
Slow addition of the alkyne to the reaction mixture and the use
Two approaches to the preparation of [14C2]TPSA were of a H2 atmosphere in place of argon dramatically reduced the
investigated: (1) a one-step deprotonation–alkylation approach amount of homocoupling. However, the reaction yield was still
and (2) a two-step deprotonation bis-alkylation, deprotection highly variable (from 15% to 75% with 40% being the norm) and
approach. These approaches are depicted in Scheme 1. In both so the Sonogashira reaction was conducted multiple times in
the approaches, addition of water to Ca14C2 produces acetylene small batches and the products combined to mitigate the loss in
gas, which is transferred via a vacuum manifold to a reaction case a reaction gave a poor yield. No reduction of the triple
flask using standard vacuum transfer methodology (Figure 1).16 bond to give alkene or alkane products was observed by LC/MS
The [14C2]acetylene gas was passed through a column contain- although if this reduction occurred prior to the Sonogashira
ing CaCO3 and then through a column containing K2CO3 to dry coupling, it likely would not have been observed.
it prior to anion formation.
For the direct, one-step approach, a solution of ethylmagne-
sium bromide was added to the condensed acetylene and the
solution was then warmed to 01C (Scheme 2).17 After complete
anion formation, a solution of triphenylsilyl chloride was
References
introduced into the reaction mixture, and the solution was
stirred overnight. Purification by silica gel chromatography
afforded a yield of 65%.
The two-step approach involved the one-pot bis-alkylation of
acetylene; the anion of acetylene was formed using n-BuLi and
was captured with triphenylsilyl chloride. The bis-silyl adduct
was then purified by preparative HPLC and then mono-
deprotected to afford the target triphenylsilyl[14C2]acetylene in
64% yield.
˚
[1] P. Bach, K. Nilsson, A. Wallberg, U. Bauer, L. G. Hammerland,
A. Peterson, T. Svensson, K. Osterlund, D. Karis, M. Boije,
D. Wensbo, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 4792–4795.
[2] S. Sharma, C. W. Lindsley, Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2007, 7,
1541–1542.
[3] K. Edo, Y. Akiyama, K. Saito, M. Mizugaki, Y. Koide, N. Ishida,
J. Antibiotics 1986, 39, 1615–1619.
[4] K. Sonogashira, Y. Tohda, N. Hagihara, Tetrahedron Lett. 1975,
4467–4470.
¨
´
[5] R. Chinchilla, C. Najera, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 874–922.
Both routes provided the modest yields of the target
triphenylsilyl[14C2]acetylene. The procedures were complicated
by non-radioactive impurities in the Ca14C2. This made exact
quantitation of the amount of radioactive Ca14C2 being added
difficult. However, in both the procedures, excess base was used
which alleviated the concern that some of the C-14 acetylene
would remain unreacted due to inadequate amount of base or
triphenylsilyl chloride.
The Sonogashira reaction proved to be a challenge. Initial
attempts to couple the [14C2]TPSA using the medicinal
chemistry procedure, resulted in either dimerization of the
acetylene or in no reaction. After probing many different
conditions, we discovered that no conversion of the [14C2]TPSA
to the target product occurred unless the alkyne was purified by
preparative HPLC. Presumably, a non-radioactive impurity that
[6] E-i. Negishi, L. Anastasia, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1979–2017.
[7] P. Siemsen, R. C. Livingston, F. Diederich, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2000, 39, 2632–2657.
[8] S. Thorand, N. Krause, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8551–8553.
[9] A. Elangovan, Y-H. Wang, T-I. Ho, Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1841–1844.
[10] H. A. Dieck, F. R. Heck, J. Organometal. Chem. 1975, 93, 259–263.
[11] L. Cassar, J. Organometal. Chem. 1975, 93, 253–257.
[12] J. Pschierer, H. Plenio, Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2551–2554.
´
[13] A-C. Uldry, J. M. Griffin, J. R. Yates, M. Perez-Torralba, M. D. S. Maria,
A. L. Webber, M. L. L. Beaumont, A. Samoson, R. M. Claramunt,
C. J. Pickard, S. P. Brown. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 945–954.
[14] J. Cacciola, J. Empfield, J. Folmer, A. M. Hunter, S. Throner, PCT Int
Appl, 2009, WO 148403.
[15] J. P. Simeone, M. P. Braun, J. F. Leone, P. Lin, R. J. DeVita,
M. Garcia-Calvo, H. G. Bull, J. Lisnock, D. C. Dean, Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 5033–5036.
[16] J. D. Cox, R. J. Warne, J. Chem. Soc. 1951, 1893–1896.
[17] U. Kru¨erke, J. Organometal. Chem. 1970, 21, 83–90.
J. Label Compd. Radiopharm 2011, 54 51–53
Copyright r 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.