nitrene precursor, catalyst and oxidant identity to improve
the efficiency of allene aziridination to synthetically useful
levels and reasonable stereoselectivities.
Attempts to utilize N-tosyloxycarbamates as nitrene
precursors were met with limited success for the synthesis
of 7 (Table 1, entries 1ꢀ4), similar to previously reported
results.3a The competitive formation of CꢀH amination
product 8 was a recurring issue, as well as unproductive
For the purposes of isolating the target MAs, we found
that carbamates provided the best balance between the
reactivity of the nitrene precursor and the subsequent
stability and reactivity of the product.6 A series of allenic
carbamates were subjected to various reaction conditions
as illustrated in Table 2. We found that the Rh2(OAc)4 and
Rh2(oct)4 (oct = O2CC7H15) catalysts previously used in
thistypeofchemistry didnotperformwellinourhands.3a,b
Rh2esp2 (esp = R,R,R0,R0-tetramethyl-1,3-benzenedipro-
pionate) and Rh2(TPA)4 (TPA = triphenyl acetate) pro-
ved to be more effective catalysts, giving complete conver-
sion of the carbamate in most cases. The choice of oxidant
was also crucial, as the leaving group released from the
PhI(OAc)2 or PhI(OPiv)2 oxidants can ring-open sensitive
MAs to yield the corresponding enecarbamates. For ex-
ample (Table 2, entry 1), the Z isomer of MA 12a was
susceptible to ring-opening by pivalate to give 12b in
addition to the desired 12a. Placing a methyl group at
the carbon R to the allene (entry 2) suppressed ring-open-
ing to give an 87% yield of MA 13a as a 2.4:1 mixture of
E/Z isomers at the olefin, with the methyl group and the
aziridine proton maintaining a trans relationship in both
alkene stereoisomers as observed by 1H NMR. The use of
Table 1. N-Tosyloxycarbamate and Sulfamate Precursors
˚
PhIO in the presence of 4 A molecular sieves minimized the
MA ring-opening and was the oxidant of choice for most
of the reactions in Table 2.
Competing CꢀH amination can occur when the tether
between the allene and the carbamate is two or more
carbons. As illustrated in entry 3, the nature of the catalyst
and oxidant influenced the aziridination vs CꢀH amina-
tion ratio and the overall yield of the reaction. A Rh2esp2
catalyst with PhI(OAc)2 (condition A) gave good conver-
sion to a mixture of 14a and 14b, but with no selectivity for
azirdination over CꢀH amination. Changing the oxidant
to PhI(OPiv)2 (condition B) improved the E/Z ratio of the
MA product from 1.5:1 to 4.1:1 but did not increase the
ratio of 14a:14b. Switching the oxidant to PhIO (condition
C) increased the ratio of 14a:14b to 4:1, with a 66% yield of
the MA. Finally, changing the catalyst to Rh2(TPA)4
resulted in a 5.3:1 ratio of 14a:14b, with an 80% yield of
the desired MA 14a (condition D). Changing the side chain
on the allene in combination with the use of Rh2(TPA)4 as
the catalyst gave only the isolated E isomer (entries 4 and
6), but CꢀH amination was competitive. Placement of
alkyl groups at positions R or β to the allene resulted in
increased amounts of CꢀH amination products (entries
7ꢀ9), although the use of Rh2(TPA)4 did improve the
aziridination/CꢀH amination ratio to some extent. Final-
ly, shutting down the possibility of CꢀH amination (entry
10) gave an excellent 94% yield of the desired MA 21a.
The E/Z ratios of the MAs in Table 2 also deserve
comment. NOESY 1D studies suggest that the E olefin
geometry is present in the major product (see the Support-
ing Information for further details). Indirect evidence that
interactions between the nitrenoid intermediate and the
alkyl chain play a role in determining the E/Z ratio is sug-
gestedbyentry 3 inTable2. Themorestericallydemanding
Rh2(TPA)4 complex increased the E/Z ratio from 1.5:1 to
around 4:1. Further studies are underway to increase the
a K2CO3, 0.1 M in acetone. b Substrate was added over 2 h, and the
acetone was dried over 4 A MS. c 2.0 equiv of PhIO, 4 A MS, CH2Cl2, rt.
d Products of hydrolysis of 10 were also observed. e 2.0 equiv of PhI-
(OAc)2, MgO, CH2Cl2, 40 °C.
tosylation of 5 with another molecule of itself to yield 9.5
The use of sulfamate 6 was successful and gave no compet-
ing CꢀH amination, but ring-opening of the labile MA to
10 (entry 5) was problematic. Increasing the tether length
between the allene and the sulfamate to three carbons (11,
entry 6) completely suppressed ring-opening of the desired
11a but also gave significant amounts of the CꢀH amina-
tion product 11b.
(5) Hayes, C. J.; Beavis, P. W.; Humphries, L. A. Chem. Commun.
2006, 4501.
(6) (a) Padwa, A.; Flick, A. C.; Leverett, C. A.; Stengel, T. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 6377. (b) Lebel, H.; Huard, K.; Lectard, S J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 14198. (c) Espino, C. G.; Du Bois, J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2001, 40, 598. (d) Lebel, H.; Huard, K.; Lectard, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 14198. (e) Espino, C. G.; Wehn, P. M.; Chow, J.; Du Bois,
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6935.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 8, 2011
1925