of alcohols with olefins was developed by Yamamoto
et al.7 However, substituted alkenes as the desired products
were obtained in moderate yields by using a relatively high
(CF3CO)2O loading (3 equiv) and long reaction time
(Scheme 1). We wish to report herein the first example of
iron-catalyzedstereospecificsubstituted olefin synthesisby
direct coupling of alcohols with alkenes and alcohols.8
Inspired by the recent work of Jiao9 and Sanz,10 the
coupling reaction was designed to be catalyzed by Lewis
acids such as FeCl3, Fe(OTf)3, AlCl3, ZnCl2, etc. and
mediated by Brønsted acids such as TsOH, TfOH,
H2SO4, etc. It was found that the acids, catalysts, and
solvent critically affect the reaction efficiency. The desired
product was obtained in 66% isolated yield under the
typical conditions: 2.0 equiv of styrene, 1.0 equiv of
benzhydrol, 10 mol % FeCl3 6H2O, 1.0 equiv of TsOH,
3
CH2Cl2, 45 °C, 5 h (See Supporting Information). It is
worth noting that (E)-prop-2-ene-1,1,3-triyltribenzene was
obtained as the major product and the (Z)-isomer was not
observed in this system.
Scheme 1. Direct Coupling of Alcohols with Some Partners To
Give Substituted Olefins
To examine the scope of this system, the coupling
reactions of various olefins with different types of benzylic
alcohols were studied (Table 1). Styrene and its derivatives
gave the desired products in moderate to quantitative
yields. Neither aliphatic alkenes nor aliphatic alcohols
were reactive in this reaction. The 1H NMR spectra of all
products except for 1n (entry 14) indicated that only the E
isomers formed. Coupling of styrene with various benzylic
alcohols produced the corresponding substituted alkenes
in moderate to good yields (entries 1À6). Both p-methyl-
styrene and p-chlorostyrene gave good yields of the (E)-
aryl-substituted propenes (entries 7À10). Interestingly,
a different major product was obtained by a mix of
different ratios of R-methylstyrene and benzhydrol
(entries 11 and 12). The 1m was formed by coupling
of benzhydrol with 1,1-diphenylethylene in 92% iso-
lated yield (entry 13). Although it took place slowly, a
more steric olefin such as 1-phenyl-1-cyclohexene gave
the desired product in excellent yield (entry 14). 3-Benz-
hydryl-1, 2-dihydronaphthalene (1o) was isolated in
69% yield by the coupling of 1,2-dihydronaphthalene
with benzhydrol (entry 15).
It is well-known that alkenes could be formed by
dehydroxylation of the corresponding secondary and
tertiary alcohols promoted by a Brønsted acid and/or a
Lewis acid. Encouraged by these results, we began to
design a series of cross couplings of benzylic alcohols.
Fortunately, we successfully accomplished an efficient
cross coupling of two types of benzylic alcohols to
prepare various substituted alkenes with water as the
only byproduct (Table 2).
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of
the formation of olefins via cross coupling of two different
benzylic alcohols. As indicated in Table 2, various benzylic
alcohols (entries 1À5, 7À9) gave the desired products in
moderate to good yields except for 1-(2-naphthyl)ethanol
(entry 6). As expected, (3-(p-tolyl)but-1-ene-1,1-diyl)-
dibenzene was produced as the major product by coupling
of 1-(p-tolyl)ethanol with 1,1-diphenylethanol (entry 10).
Homocoupling of the benzylic alcohols also gave the
corresponding 1,3-diarylbut-1-ene derivatives in moderate
to high yields (entries 11À17). Since diarylcarbenium ions
are more stable than methylarylcarbenium ions, a selective
Initially, we chose styrene and benzhydrol as model
substrates to optimize suitable conditions for this reaction.
(3) (a) Liu, Z.-Q.; Sun, L.; Wang, J.-G.; Han, J.; Zhao, Y.-K.; Zhou,
B. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1437. (b) Liu, Z.-Q.; Wang, J.-G.; Han, J.; Zhao,
Y.-K.; Zhou, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1240. (c) Han, J.; Cui, Z.;
Wang, J.; Liu, Z.-Q. Synth. Commun. 2010, 40, 2042.
(4) (a) Kabalka, G. W.; Dong, G.; Venkataiah, B. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
893. (b) Kabalka, G. W.; Yao, M.; Borella, S.; Wu, Z. Chem. Commun.
2005, 2492. (c) Kabalka, G. W.; Yao, M.; Borella, S.; Wu, Z. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 2865. (d) Kabalka, G. W.; Yao, M.; Borella, S. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 879. (e) Kabalka, G. W.; Yao, M.; Borella, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 11320.
(5) (a) Yasuda, M.; Saito, T.; Ueba, M.; Baba, A. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2004, 43, 1414. (b) Saito, T.; Yasuda, M.; Baba, A. Synlett 2005,
1737. (c) Saito, T.; Nishimoto, Y.; Yasuda, M.; Baba, A. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 8516. (d) Yasuda, M.; Somyo, T.; Baba, A. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2006, 45, 793. (e) Nishimoto, Y.; Kajioka, M.; Saito, T.; Yasuda, M.;
Baba, A. Chem. Commun. 2008, 6396. (f) Nishimoto, Y.; Onishi, Y.;
Yasuda, M.; Baba, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9131.
(6) Wawzonek, S.; Dufek, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 3530.
(7) Narahashi, H.; Shimizu, I.; Yamamoto, A. J. Organomet. Chem.
2008, 693, 283.
(8) For recent reviews of iron-catalyzed transformations, see: (a)
Bolm, C.; Legros, J.; Le Paih, J.; Zani, L. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 6217.
(b) Shinokubo, H.; Oshima, K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 2081. (c)
€
Furstner, A.; Martin, R. Chem. Lett. 2005, 34, 624. (d) Enthaler, S.;
Junge, K.; Beller, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3317. (e) Sherry,
€
B. D.; Furstner, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1500. (f) Correa, A.;
ꢀ
(10) Sanz, R.; Miguel, D.; Martınez, A.; Alvarez-Gutierrez, J. M.;
~
Mancheno, O. G.; Bolm, C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1108.
ꢀ
(9) Xiang, S.-K.; Zhang, L.-H.; Jiao, N. Chem. Commun. 2009, 6487.
Rodrıguez, F. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2027.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 9, 2011
2209