494
C. Wang et al. / Steroids 76 (2011) 491–496
65.12, 57.47, 56.10, 53.75, 47.55, 44.79, 37.98, 36.97, 35.53, 35.33,
34.00, 32.01, 31.30(3C), 28.41, 27.08, 26.36, 26.11, 20.63, 12.35; IR
(NaCl, film, cm−1): 3414, 2243, 1670, 1445, 731; Anal. Calcd. for
C27H38O3: C, 78.98; H, 9.33; Found C, 79.22; H, 9.18.
39.17, 36.35, 35.81, 33.10, 32.83, 32.25, 30.22, 28.93, 28.63, 28.34,
27.97, 25.47, 22.01(3C), 19.61, 11.09; IR (NaCl, film, cm−1): 3393,
2247, 1701, 1612, 1448, 909, 732; Anal. Calcd. for C27H38O2: C,
82.18; H, 9.71; Found C, 82.12; H, 9.58.
2.2.3.4. (3˛,5˛)-3-Hydroxy-22-(3-(3-hydroxy-3-methylbut-1-
2.3. Cytotoxic activity against human epidermoid carcinoma cell
line KB, human cervical carcinoma cell line HeLa, human gastric
carcinoma cell line MKN-28 and human breast carcinoma cell line
MCF-7
ynyl))-13,23-cyclo-18,21-dinorchol-22-en-23-one
(6). Following
the general procedure, the title compound 6 was obtained as
needles solid, 86% in yield, mp 120–122 ◦C (EtOAc–hexanes);
[␣]2D0 = +60.29◦ (c = 0.59, CHCl3); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) 7.60
(d, J = 3.3 Hz, 1H), 4.09 (s, 1H), 3.82 (s, 1H), 2.74 (m, 1H), 1.56 (s, 6H),
0.912 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): 209.81, 165.48, 128.24,
100.50, 73.04, 66.42, 64.98, 57.28, 57.04, 54.10, 49.86, 39.16, 36.35,
35.81, 33.09, 32.95, 32.31, 32.25, 31.13, 30.98, 30.16, 28.84, 28.34,
25.50, 19.66, 11.22; IR (NaCl, film, cm−1): 3401, 2245, 1687, 1448,
1360, 1165, 908, 732; Anal. Calcd. for C26H36O3: C, 78.75; H, 9.15;
Found C, 78.48; H, 8.96.
All tumor cell lines tested were purchased from Shanghai Insti-
tute of Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Science. The cell lines were
cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% newborn calf serum. It
was maintained in a humidified incubator with an atmosphere of
95% air and 5% CO2 at 37 ◦C. The cells were continuously passaged
once every 3–4 days. Growing cells were collected on experiments.
DMSO was used as latent solvent with the highest concentration
less than 0.1% in solution of the drug. The control groups of dox-
orubicin, blank (1640) and DMSO solvent were set up at the same
time. Proliferative activity was evaluated by colorimetric sulforho-
damine B (SRB) assay. Briefly, cells were plated in 96-well plates.
After cell adhering, they were treated with different compounds in
a dose-dependent way for 44 h. Then the cells were fixed by 10%
TDA for 1 h and stained by SRB for 10 min. After washed with acetic
acid to remove the excess dye, protein bounding dye was dissolved
in 10 mM Tris and detected by a Model Elx 800 Autoplate reader
(Bio-Tek Instruments, USA).
2.2.3.5. (3˛,5˛)-3-Hydroxy-22-(3-(3-hydroxybut-1-ynyl))-13,23-
cyclo-18,21-dinorchol-22-en-23-one (7). Following the general
procedure, the title compound 7 was obtained as needles solid,
90% in yield, mp 115–117 ◦C (EtOAc–hexanes); [␣]2D0 = +82.21◦
(c = 0.62, CHCl3); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) 7.61 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H),
4.69 (m, 1H), 4.08 (s, 1H), 3.63 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H), 2.75 (m, 1H), 2.30
(m, 1H), 2.20 (s, 1H), 1.49 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (s, 3H); 13C NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3): 209.98, 165.74, 128.08, 97.80, 74.78, 66.44, 58.24,
57.30, 56.90, 53.94, 49.86, 39.13, 36.34, 35.74, 33.01, 32.92, 32.27,
32.24, 30.10, 28.79, 28.32, 25.53, 23.91, 19.58, 11.11; IR (NaCl, film,
cm−1): 3418, 2247, 1694, 1613, 1447, 1115, 908, 732; Anal. Calcd.
for C25H34O3: C, 78.49; H, 8.96; Found C, 78.40; H, 8.76.
3. Results and discussion
2.2.3.6. (3˛,5˛)-3-Hydroxy-22-(3-(3-hydroxyprop-1-ynyl))-13,23-
cyclo-18,21-dinorchol-22-en-23-one (8). Following the general
procedure, the title compound 8 was obtained as needles solid,
80% in yield, mp 110–113 ◦C (EtOAc–hexanes); [␣]2D0 = +55.71◦
(c = 0.70, CHCl3); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) 7.64 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H),
4.44 (s, 2H), 4.07 (s, 1H), 2.76 (m, 1H), 2.49 (bs, 1H), 2.30 (m, 1H),
0.91 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): 209.75, 166.13, 128.11,
93.79, 76.73, 66.60, 57.40, 56.93, 54.03, 51.38, 49.97, 39.28, 36.44,
35.85, 33.09, 33.00, 32.33(2C), 30.16, 28.97, 28.40, 25.64, 19.62,
11.90; IR (NaCl, film, cm−1): 3400, 2248, 1694, 1446, 908, 731;
Anal. Calcd. for C24H32O3: C, 78.22; H, 8.75; Found C, 78.20; H,
8.66.
3.1. Chemistry
18,21-dinorcholenones in 93–98% yields through iodination of
presence of DMAP and pyridine in CCl4 at room temperature
for 15 h (Scheme 1 and Table 1). Recently, the construction
of conjugated enynes via palladium-catalyzed coupling reac-
tion of 1-alkynes with 1-haloalkenes or alkenyl triflates has
attracted considerable interest [13,14]. Among of them, it is
convenient of palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of
terminal alkynes with ␣-halo-␣,-unsaturated ketones. Typi-
cally these coupling reactions are carried out using a palladium
catalyst such as Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, Pd(PPh3)4, Pd(OAc)2 and a cop-
per salt as co-catalyst in the presence of an amine base.
To make a detailed investigation for the cross-coupling reac-
tion of 22-iodo cyclo-18,21-dinorcholenone 2a and 3-butyn-2-ol,
in THF in the presence of 10% Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.05 equiv.), CuI
(0.10 equiv.), and DIPEA (3.00 mmol) under a nitrogen atmosphere
cyclo-18,21-dinorchol-22-en-20-one 3 in 85% yield (Table 3, entry
1). The use of Pd(PPh3)4 (0.05 equiv.) or Pd/C (0.05 equiv.)-PPh3
(0.12 equiv.) in the place of Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 gave the yield of 3 to 92%,
72% respectively (Table 3, entries 2 and 3). Therefore, it was evi-
dent that Pd(PPh3)4 (5 mol%) was the most effective catalyst for
this transformation. But Pd/C–CuI–PPh3 is a less expensive catalytic
system than Pd(PPh3)4–CuI or Pd(PPh3)2Cl2–CuI catalytic system.
When copper iodide was replaced with silver halides for the cou-
pling reaction of sensitive vinyl triflates and 1-alkyne [15], the
desired conjugated enyne product was efficiently obtained in good
yield. Thus, we tested this reaction using the above said 22-iodo-
18,21-dinorcholenone 2a and 3-butyn-2-ol in THF under nitrogen
in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4 using silver iodide as a co-catalyst. It
2.2.3.7. (3˛,5˛)-3-Hydroxy-22-(3-(2-(1-
hydroxycyclohexyl)ethynyl))-13,23-cyclo-18,21-dinorchol-22-en-
23-one (9). Following the general procedure, the title compound
9 was obtained as needles solid, 92% in yield, mp 150–152 ◦C
(EtOAc–hexanes); [␣]2D0 = +74.43◦ (c = 0.46, CHCl3); 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) 7.60 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.08 (s, 1H), 3.75 (m, 1H),
2.73 (m, 1H), 2.33–2.29 (m, 2H), 0.91 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz,
CDCl3): 209.85, 165.42, 128.32, 99.69, 74.78, 68.42, 66.38, 57.24,
57.03, 54.05, 49.82, 39.58(2C), 39.10, 36.31, 35.76, 33.06, 32.89,
32.30, 32.24, 30.16, 28.81, 28.32, 25.50, 25.16, 23.15(2C), 19.66,
11.23; IR (NaCl, film, cm−1): 3419, 2243, 1689, 1614, 1447, 907,
732; Anal. Calcd. for C29H40O3: C, 79.77; H, 9.23; Found C, 79.42;
H, 9.18.
2.2.3.8. (3˛,5˛)-3-Hydroxy-22-(3-(4-methylpent-1-ynyl))-13,23-
cyclo-18,21-dinorchol-22-en-23-one (10). Following the general
procedure, the title compound 10 was obtained as needles solid,
94% in yield, mp 110–112 ◦C (EtOAc–hexanes); [␣]2D0 = +87.70◦
(c = 0.37, CHCl3); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) 7.55 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H),
4.05 (s, 1H), 2.73 (m, 1H), 2.35 (m, 1H), 2.27 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 1.00
(d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H), 0.92 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): 209.72,
164.49, 129.09, 95.55, 72.36, 66.45, 57.00, 56.95, 54.08, 49.57,