Scheme 8 The reaction of (5-Dipp)Cu(OAc)2 with water.
In conclusion, we discussed previously reported data and
performed a thorough investigation of the reactivity of free NHCs
and their Ag(I) complexes towards Cu(II) salts. It was found
that (NHC)CuX2 complexes are unstable. They decompose to
give haloamidinium salts. On the other hand, oxygen-containing
ligands, such as OAc or CŸO chelating NHCs make Cu(II)
complexes fairly stable. The nature of this stabilizing effect is yet
to be determined.
Fig. 1 The molecular structure of (IMes)Cu(OAc)2. Anisotropic displace-
ment ellipsoids are draw◦n at the 40% probability level. Selected bond
˚
distances (A) and angles ( ): Cu1–C1 1.960(4), Cu1–O1 1.989(3), Cu1–O2
2.077(3), Cu1–O3 1.963(3), Cu1–O4 2.356(3), N1–C1 1.337(4), N2–C1
1.332(5), O1–Cu1–O3 164.2(1), O1–Cu1–C1 99.0(1), O3–Cu1–C1 96.8(1),
N1–C1–N2 105.5(3).
Mixtures of in situ generated carbenes with CuX2 were previ-
ously reported as efficient pre-catalysts in a number of catalytic
transformations.1 In this report we have clearly shown that
(NHC)CuX2 complexes are not operative. We provided solid
evidence that Cu(I) should preferably be considered as the true
catalytic species. As a result, we believe that the data presented here
will give rise to knowledge-based development of new, efficient,
copper NHC catalytic systems.
Notes and references
1 (a) J. C. Y. Lin, R. T. W. Huang, C. S. Lee, A. Bhattacharyya, W. S.
Hwang and I. J. B. Lin, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 3561–3598; (b) S. Diez-
Gonzalez and S. P. Nolan, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 349–358; (c) S.
Diez-Gonzalez and S. P. Nolan, Aldrichimica Acta, 2008, 41, 43–51;
(d) S. P. Nolan, N-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Synthesis, 1st edn, Wiley-
VCH,Weinheim, 2006.
2 M.-L. Teyssot, A.-S. Jarrousse, M. Manin, A. Chevry, S. Roche, F.
Norre, C. Beaudoin, L. Morel, D. Boyer, R. Mahiou and A. Gautier,
Dalton Trans., 2009, 6894–6902.
3 A. O. Larsen, W. Leu, C. N. Oberhuber, J. E. Campbell and A. H.
Hoveyda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 11130–11131.
4 J. Yun, D. Kim and H. Yun, Chem. Commun., 2005, 5181–
5183.
Fig. 2 The molecular structure of (6-Mes)Cu(OAc)2. Anisotropic dis-
placement ellipsoids are drawn ◦at the 40% probability level. Selected
˚
bond distances (A) and angles ( ): Cu1–C1 1.981(3), Cu1–O1 1.957(3),
Cu1–O2 2.254(3), Cu1–O3 1.962(3), Cu1–O4 2.252(3), N1–C1 1.339(5),
N2–C1 1.333(4), O1–Cu1–O3 160.1(2), O1–Cu1–C1 96.1(2), O3–Cu1–C1
103.8(2), N1–C1–N2 118.3(2).
5 P. L. Arnold, M. Rodden, K. M. Davis, A. C. Scarisbrick, A. J. Blake
and C. Wilson, Chem. Commun., 2004, 1612–1613.
6 C. Y. Legault, C. Kendall and A. B. Charette, Chem. Commun., 2005,
3826–3828.
7 J. Haider, K. Kunz and U. Scholz, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2004, 346, 717–
722.
Moreover, relatively strong intramolecular interactions are ob-
served between the Cu and the distal oxygen atoms. Interestingly,
the lengths of the dative Cu–O bonds for the two diacetate
4
˚
ligands in (IDipp)Cu(OAc)2 (2.259(3) and 2.259(3) A) and (6-
˚
Mes)Cu(OAc)2 (2.254(3) and 2.252(3) A) are equal, whereas
8 H. M. J. Wang and I. J. B. Lin, Organometallics, 1998, 17, 972–
975.
˚
those in (IMes)Cu(OAc)2 (2.077(3) and 2.356(3) A) are signif-
9 (a) M. Iglesias, D. J. Beetstra, J. C. Knight, L.-L. Ooi, A. Stasch, S.
Coles, L. Male, M. B. Hursthouse, K. J. Cavell, A. Dervisi and I. A.
Fallis, Organometallics, 2008, 27, 3279–3289; (b) E. L. Kolychev, I. A.
Portnyagin, V. V. Shuntikov, V. N. Khrustalev and M. S. Nechaev, J.
Organomet. Chem., 2009, 694, 2454–2462.
10 M. L. Cole, C. Jones and P. C. Junk, New J. Chem., 2002, 26, 1296–1303.
11 (a) A. J. Arduengo, F. Davidson, H. V. R. Dias, J. R. Goerlich, D.
Khasnis, W. J. Marshall and T. K. Prakasha, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1997, 119, 12742–12749; (b) R. Jazzar, J.-B. Bourg, D. Dewhurst
Rian, B. Donnadieu and G. Bertrand, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 3492–
3499.
12 D. Hirsch-Weil, D. R. Snead, S. Inagaki, H. Seo, K. A. Abboud and S.
K. Hong, Chem. Commun., 2009, 2475–2477.
13 P. de Fre´mont, R. Singh, E. D. Stevens, J. L. Petersen and S. P. Nolan,
Organometallics, 2007, 26, 1376–1385.
14 B.-L. Lin, P. Kang and T. D. P. Stack, Organometallics, 2010, 29, 3683–
3685.
15 A. Grandbois, M.-E. Mayer, M. Bedard, S. K. Collins and T. Michel,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 9655–9659.
icantly different. This fact, apparently, determines the different
symmetries of the crystal packing of the three copper(II)–NHC
diacetate complexes. So, complex (IDipp)Cu(OAc)2 crystallises in
the monoclinic C2/c space group, with the molecule occupying a
special position on the two-fold axis.4 Complex (6-Mes)Cu(OAc)2
crystallises in the monoclinic Cc space group, with the molecule
lying on the pseudo-crystallographic two-fold axis. The complex
¯
(IMes)Cu(OAc)2 crystallizes in the triclinic Pspace group.
Some reactivity studies of (5-Dipp)Cu(OAc)2 have been per-
formed. We attempted to exchange the OAc groups with bromide
ions. Unfortunately, (5-Dipp)Cu(OAc)2 does not react with LiBr
in acetone, nor with [Bu4N]Br in chloroform.
It was found that (5-Dipp)Cu(OAc)2 is sensitive to water
(Scheme 8). Decomposition in wet chloroform proceeds within
a few hours to give the corresponding open ring formamide 8.
3076 | Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 3074–3076
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©