Metalloporphyrins
J. Phys. Chem., Vol. 100, No. 50, 1996 19613
D-A acyclic trienes (only three double bonds between the donor
and the acceptor).17,18 A possible reason for this lies in the
cyclic π-conjugation that normally reduces the effective path
length for π-electron delocalization. For example, cyclic tri-
and tetraene systems always have lower â values compared to
their acyclic analogues with the same donor-acceptor substitu-
tions. Charge transfer interaction between the donor and
acceptor through a π-electron backbone is most favorable when
the double bonds are in an all-trans configuration.19
Conclusion
In this paper, we report a series of metalloporphyrins
specifically tailored for quadratic NLO properties. The mo-
lecular hyperpolarizabilities of these porphyrins are high, but
the cyclic nature of the π-backbone and dihedral twist of the
phenyl rings with respect to the porphyrin base limit highly
efficient coupling of donor acceptor moieties across the por-
phyrin periphery. The â values of ZnII porphyrins can be
adequately accounted for by invoking the two-state model. For
the CuII porphyrin derivatives, however, the origin of nonlin-
earity is very much different and the contribution to â from
other electronic states seems to be responsible for large â values.
Work is in progress to further probe the role of the metal ion
electronic configuration on the NLO response of metallopor-
phyrins as well as the effect of solvent polarity on their â values.
In these free-base porphyrins, â increases substantially on
metallation. The presence of metal ions eliminates the distinct
CT interaction arising from the nitro or dimethylamino substitu-
tion (compounds b, c, vs Znb, Znc and Cub, Cuc). The major
effect due to the metal ion is observed in the derivatives bearing
both donor and acceptor moieties. Solvatochromic studies on
both absorption and fluorescence transitions of all the com-
pounds (data not shown) indicate that with increasing solvent
polarity both bands shift to the red region. This suggests that
the change in dipole moment, µ, is positive, and within the
context of the two-state model,20 â is also positive. We have
observed from the solvatochromic measurements that µ is higher
for compound Znd than either amino- or nitro-substituted
porphyrins (Znb and Znc). Also, significant solvatochromic
shifts of the emission bands were observed in the case of Znd
(λex ) 410 nm) compared to that in d, indicating more charge-
transfer nature of the excited state of the zinc(II) derivative than
the corresponding free-base porphyrin. Therefore, the higher
value of â in the ZnII derivatives originates partly in the large
change in dipole moment upon excitation. However, the
absorption shifts in CuII complexes in various solvents are not
significant, implying that the two-state model cannot account
for the high â values in CuII porphyrins. It is of interest to
note that for the same D-A substituents, the open shell metal
ion CuII (d9 system) exhibits (Table 1) a higher â value than
the corresponding closed shell ZnII (d10 system) porphyrin.
Similar observations have been made recently by Di Bella et
al.21 for a series of metallosalophen systems. They have shown
experimentally as well as theoretically by the ZINDO/sum-over-
state (SOS) approach that for the same ligand, open shell metal
ions [CuII and CoII in their case] lead to much higher â values
than the closed shell NiII metal ion. Unlike in the CuII-salophen
complexes, we have not observed any distinct metal-ligand or
ligand-metal charge transfer band (MLCT or LMCT) in the
visible or near-UV region of the absorption spectrum for open
shell CuII porphyrins. Since all the porphyrin molecules studied
here absorb 532 nm light (ꢀ532 g 103 M-1 cm-1), the two-photon
resonance enhancement of â will be significant.22 For similar
substitutions, ꢀ532 values of copper(II) derivatives are higher
than those of the zinc(II) derivatives. Therefore, two-photon
resonance enhancement is partially responsible for the large â
in CuII porphyrins. However, the free-base porphyrin d, which
has the highest ꢀ532 value relative to the corresponding copper-
(II) and zinc(II) derivatives, exhibits the lowest â value among
them. Therefore, we believe that the contribution from reso-
nance enhancement to the first hyperpolarizability cannot be
all that important and the metal d-electrons are more effective
in fine tuning the first hyperpolarizability.
Acknowledgment. The laser used in these experiments was
purchased with a grant from the Department of Science and
Technology (DST), Government of India. One of us (P.C.R.)
thanks the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research,
Government of India for a senior research fellowship.
References and Notes
(1) Long, N. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 21.
(2) Laidlaw, W. M.; Denning, R. G.; Verbiest, T.; Chauchard, E.;
Persoons, A. Nature (London) 1993, 363, 58.
(3) Ho, Z. Z.; Ju, C. Y.; Hetherington, W. M., III. J. Appl. Phys. 1987,
62, 716.
(4) Rao, D. V. G. L. N.; Aranda, F. J.; Roach, J. F.; Remy, D. E. Appl.
Phys. Lett. 1991, 58, 1241.
(5) Suslick, K. S.; Chen, Chin-Ti; Meredith, G. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 6928.
(6) Terhune, R. W.; Maker, P. D.; Savage, C. M. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1965,
14, 681.
(7) Clays, K.; Persoons, A.; De Mayer, L. AdV. Chem. Phys. 1994, 85,
455.
(8) Zyss, J.; Van, T. C.; Dhenaut, C.; Tand Ledoux, I. Chem. Phys.
1993, 177, 281.
(9) Ray, P. C.; Das, P. K. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 17891.
(10) Lindsey, J. S.; Schreiman, I. C.; Hsu, H. C.; Kearney, P. C.;
Marguere Haz, A. M. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 827.
(11) Sen, A.; Krishnan, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 5421.
(12) Clays, K.; Persoons, A. ReV. Sci. Instrum. 1992, 63, 3285.
(13) Bershon, R.; Pao, Y.-H.; Frisch, H. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 45,
3184.
(14) Ray, P. C.; Munichandriah, N.; Das, P. K. Chem. Phys. 1996, 211,
511.
(15) Ramasesha, S.; Shuai, Z.; Bredas, J. L. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995,
245, 224.
(16) Birnbaum, E. R.; Hodge, J. A.; Grinstaff, M. W.; Schaefer, W. P.;
Henling, L.; Labinger, J. A.; Bercaw, J. E.; Gray, H. B. Inorg. Chem. 1995,
34, 3625.
(17) Tiemann, B. G.; Cheng, L. T.; Marder, S. R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1993, 735.
(18) Barzoukas, M.; Blanchard-Desce, M.; Josse, D.; Lehn, J.-M.; Zyss,
J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 133, 323.
(19) Verbiest, T.; Clays, K.; Samyn, C.; Wolff, J.; Reinhoudt, D.;
Persoons, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 9320.
(20) Oudar, J. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 97, 446.
(21) Bella, S. D.; Fragala, I.; Ledoux, I.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 9481.
(22) Ray, P. C.; Das, P. K. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 14414.
JP962427R