M. Muthukrishnan et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 2387–2389
2389
4. (a) O’Brien, R. J.; Nunn, P. P. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001, 162, 1055; (b)
Laughon, B. E. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 463; (c) Duncan, K.; Barry, C. E., III
Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2004, 7, 460; (d) Ranjithkumar, R.; Perumal, S.;
Senthilkumar, P.; Yogeeswari, P.; Sriram, D. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 5731.
5. (a) Frank, R. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2004, 15, 573; (b) Ortholand, J. Y.; Ganesan,
A. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 271; (c) Mehta, G.; Singh, V. Chem. Soc. Rev.
2002, 31, 324; (d) Koch, M. A.; Schuffenhauer, M.; Scheck, M.; Wetzel, S.;
Casaulta, M.; Odermatt, A.; Ertl, P.; Waldmann, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2005, 102, 17272; (e) Zinzalla, G.; Milroy, L. G.; Ley, S. V. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2006, 4, 1977.
6. Horton, D. A.; Bourne, G. T.; Smythe, M. L. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 893.
7. (a) Ellis, G. P. Chromenes, Chromanones and Chromones In The Chemistry of
Heterocyclic Compounds; Wiley: New York, 1977; Vol. 31,; (b) Hepworth, J In
Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry; Katrizky, A. R., Rees, C. W., Eds.;
Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1984; Vol. 3, pp 737–883.
8. (a) Muthukrishnan, M.; Basavanag, U. M. V.; Puranik, V. G. Tetrahedron Lett.
2009, 50, 2643; (b) Muthukrishnan, M.; Singh, O. V. Synth. Commun. 2008, 38,
3875; (c) Muthukrishnan, M.; Patil, P. S.; More, S. V.; Joshi, R. A. Mendeleev
Commun. 2005, 100; (d) Singh, O. V.; Muthukrishnan, M.; Gopan, R. Synth.
Commun. 2005, 35, 2723; (e) Singh, O. V.; Muthukrishnan, M.; Sundaravadivelu,
M. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B 2005, 44, 2575.
9. (a) Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004;
(b) Meldel, M.; Tornoe, C. W. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2952; (c) Tron, G. C.; Pirali,
T.; Billington, R. A.; Canonico, P. L.; Sorba, G.; Genazzani, A. A. Med. Res. Rev.
2008, 28, 278; (d) Tornoe, C. W.; Christensen, C.; Meldal, M. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 3057; (e) Yoon, J.; Ryu, J. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3930.
10. Kolb, H. C.; Sharpless, K. B. Drug Discovery Today 2003, 8, 1128.
11. Kabbe, H. J. Synthesis 1978, 886.
1,2,3-triazole fused spirochromones conjugates 5a–e, 6a–e in
65–90% yields with high purity.13 In this reaction, the copper(I)
catalyst was generated in situ by the reduction of copper(II)sulfate
with sodium ascorbate, as described by Sharpless.14 The structure
of all the new compounds 5a–e, 6a–e were confirmed by the 1H
NMR, 13C NMR and mass spectral data (Supplementary data)
All the new triazole fused spirochromone conjugates were
screened for their in vitro antimycobacterial activity against M.
tuberculosis H37Rv (ATCC27294) using an agar dilution method.15
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC;
lg/mL) was deter-
mined for each compound. The MIC is defined as the minimum
concentration of compound required to completely inhibit the bac-
terial growth. Rifampicin and ethambutol were used as reference
compounds. The MIC values of the synthesized compounds along
with the standard drugs for comparison were reported in Table 1.
Most of the compounds (5b–c, 5e, 6c, 6e) showed a significant
in vitro activity against M. tuberculosis, MIC in the range of 0.78–
6.25
lg/mL. Among them, compound 5e is found to be more active
having MIC 0.78
lg/mL among all the compounds screened and the
potency is better than first line antibacterial drug ethambutol.
Importantly, compound 5e represents a novel structural chemo-
type for which antitubercular properties have not been previously
noted. Preliminary structure–activity relationship of the triazole
fused spirochromone conjugates reveals that compounds possess-
ing cyclohexyl group at 2nd position of the chromone ring favor
better activity than piperidinyl moiety. Furthermore, aromatic sub-
stitution at 4th position of the triazole is favorable than alkyl
substitution.
In conclusion, a new class of 1,2,3-triazole fused spirochromone
conjugates have been synthesized. All the compounds were ob-
tained in good yield and were tested as new potential antitubercu-
lar agents. One of those compounds, 5e showed good activity
against MTB. Further optimization of this series is ongoing and will
be reported shortly.
12. Moskvina, V. S.; Garazd, Y. L.; Garazd, M. M.; Turov, A. V.; Khilya, V. P. Chem.
Heterocycl. Compd. 2007, 43, 421.
13. Typical procedure for the synthesis of compound 5e: To a stirred solution of azido
spirochromone 4a (0.23 g; 0.7 mmol) and 1-ethynyl-4-pentylbenzene (0.13 g;
0.77 mmol) in tbutanol (3 mL) was added sequentially copper sulphate
pentahydrate (0.035 g; 0.14 mmol), sodium ascorbate (0.028 g; 0.14 mmol)
and distilled water (3 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h
at 60 °C. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction
mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and then washed with water
(2 Â 5 mL). The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated in vacuo.
The residue was purified by column chromatography over silica gel with
ethylacetate/hexanes (1:1) as eluent to furnish compound 5e as a colorless
solid, 0.264 g (75%). Other compounds were synthesized similarly, and the
spectroscopic data of selected compounds are as follows:
Analytical data for compound 5e: colorless solid; mp 156–57 °C; ; 1H NMR
(200 MHz, CDCl3): d 0.90 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H),1.22–1.72 (m, 14H), 1.93–2.0 (m,
2H), 2.56–2.60 (m, 2H), 2.63 (s, 2H), 4.08–4.11 (br d, J = 4.6 Hz, 2H), 4.43–4.74
(m, 3H), 4.96 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H), 6.43 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.52–6.57 (dd, J = 8.6,
2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 9.0 Hz,
1H), 7.79 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 191.3, 164.7, 161.5, 147.4, 143.1, 128.8,
128.3, 127.3, 125.4, 121.1, 115.1, 109.2, 102.0, 80.5, 69.3, 68.4, 53.2, 47.8, 35.6,
34.7, 31.4, 31.0, 25.1, 22.5, 21.4, 14.0; ESI-MS: m/z 526 [M+Na]+.
Acknowledgment
M.M. is thankful to the Department of Science and Technology,
Govt. of India for generous funding of the project (Grant SR/FTP/
CS-25/2007).
Analytical data for compound 6c: colorless solid; mp 128–29 °C 1H NMR
(200 MHz, CDCl3): d 1.46 (s, 9H), 1.50–1.66 (m, 2H), 1.90–1.96 (m, 2H), 2.36 (s,
3H), 2.65 (s, 2H), 3.13–3.25 (m, 2H), 3.82–3.88 (m, 2H), 4.07–4.10 (br d,
J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 4.45–4.73 (m, 4H), 6.44 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.55–6.61 (dd, J = 8.9,
2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.79(d, J = 7.6 Hz,
1H), 7.81 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 190.2, 164.8, 160.9, 154.7, 147.5, 138.1,
129.5, 128.5, 127.2, 125.4, 121.1, 115.0, 109.7, 102.1, 79.8, 78.3, 69.4, 68.4, 60.4,
53.2, 47.6, 39.1, 34.0, 28.4, 21.3; ESI-MS: m/z 571 [M+Na]+.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental procedures, compound
characterization data and copies of 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HPLC
chromatograms of compounds 5b, 5e, 6a, 6d) associated with this
Analytical data for compound 6d: colorless oil; 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): d 1.46
(s, 9H), 1.51–1.66 (m, 2H), 1.85–2.04 (m, 2H), 2.65 (s, 2H), 3.13–3.25 (m, 2H),
3.83 (s, 3H), 3.84–3.89 (m, 2H), 4.08–4.10 (br d, J = 4.2 Hz, 2H), 4.45–4.73 (m,
4H), 6.43 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.56–6.61 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d,
J = 9.3 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 2H), 7.76 (s, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H); 13C
NMR (CDCl3): d 190.1, 164.8, 160.9, 159.6, 154.7, 147.3, 128.5, 126.8, 122.7,
120.6, 115.1, 114.2, 109.7, 102.1, 79.8, 78.3, 69.3, 68.5, 55.3, 53.1, 47.6, 39.0,
34.0, 28.4; ESI-MS: m/z 587 [M+Na]+.
References and notes
14. Himo, F.; Lovell, T.; Hilgraf, R.; Rostovtsev, V. V.; Noodleman, L.; Sharpless, K.
B.; Fokin, V. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 210.
1. WHO Global Tuberculosis Control Report, 2009.
2. (a) Gutierrez-Lugo, M. T.; Bewley, C. A. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 2606; (b) Smith,
C. V.; Sharma, V.; Sacchettini, J. C. Tuberculosis 2004, 84, 45.
15. NCCLS-National
Committee
for
Clinical
Laboratory
Standards,
Antimycobacterial susceptibility testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
3. (a) Corbett, E. L.; Watt, C. J.; Walker, N.; Maher, D.; Williams, B. G.; Raviglione,
M. C.; Dye, C. Arch. Intern. Med. 2003, 163, 1009; (b) Long, R. Can. Med. Assoc. J.
2000, 163, 425; (c) Pozniak, A. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2000, 4, 993.
Proposed standard M24-T; Villanova, PA, 1995.