Chemistry Letters Vol.34, No.10 (2005)
1317
G. Cruciani, H. Weber, H. Lemoine, A. Derix, C. Weichel, and
M. Clementi, J. Med. Chem., 42, 981 (1999). c) M. J. Chen,
Y. M. Lee, J. R. Sheu, C. T. Hu, and M. H. Yen, J. Pharm. Pharma-
col., 50, 83 (1998).
a) R. Martinez, E. Cortes, R. A. Toscano, and L. J. Alfaro, J. Heter-
ocycl. Chem., 27, 1273 (1990). b) C. Bandyopadhyay, S. K. Ranabir,
R. Partra, and S. Banerjee, J. Chem. Res., 2003, 459. c) E. B. A.
Hafez, M. H. Elnagdi, A. G. A. Elagamey, and F. M. A. A.
El-Taweel, Heterocycles, 26, 903 (1987).
H2O
O
X
Ar
OH
Ar CH
+
O
N
N
H
O
X
3
H2N
Ar
NH2
O
O
+
OH2
Ar
4
5
N. V. Kumar and S. P. Rajendran, Asian J. Chem., 15, 111 (2003).
Y. Liu, Y. Ding, and Y. Liu, Huaxue Yanjiu Yu Yingyong, 7, 430
(1995).
X
O
O
X
6
a) S. W. Elmore, J. K. Pratt, M. J. Coghlan, Y. Mao, B. E. Green,
D. D. Anderson, M. A. Stashko, C. W. Lin, D. Falls, M. Nakane,
L. Miller, C. M. Tyree, J. N. Miner, and B. Lane, Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett., 14, 1721 (2004). b) Y. Y. Ku, T. Grieme, P. Raje,
P. Sharma, H. E. Morton, M. Rozema, and S. A. King, J. Org.
Chem., 68, 3238 (2003).
HO
H
N
-H2O
3
X
O
Ar
Scheme 2.
7
8
P. R. Kym, M. E. Kort, M. J. Coghlan, J. L. Moore, R. Tang,
and J. D. Ratajczyk, J. Med. Chem., 46, 1016 (2003).
L. Zhi, C. M. Tegley, B. Pio, J. P. Edward, M. Motamedi, T. D.
Jones, K. B. Marschke, D. E. Mais, B. Risek, and W. T. Schrader,
J. Med. Chem., 46, 4104 (2003).
zilidenenaphthalen-2-amine gave expected products in high
yields and purity. The products 3 were completely characterized
by IR, H NMR, and elemental analyses. The analyses were in
1
9
a) R. Breslow and D. C. Rideout, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102, 7816
(1980).
agreement with their structures. The IR spectra for 3a exhibited
sharp bands at 3310 cmꢂ1 (NH) and 1657 cmꢂ1 (C=O). The
1H NMR spectrum of 3a exhibited a singlet identified methine
(5.91) along with multiplets (7.28–8.40) for aromatic protons.
The NH proton resonance at 10.18 disappeared after addition
of D2O to the DMSO-d6 solution of 3a. In order to further con-
firm the structure of the product, the X-ray diffraction analysis13
of 3a was carried out.
10 a) R. Breslow, U. Maitra, and D. C. Rideout, Tetrahedron Lett., 24,
1901 (1983). b) R. Breslow, Acc. Chem. Res., 24, 159 (1991).
11 a) X. S. Wang, D. Q. Shi, Y. L. Li, H. Chen, X. Y. Wei, and Z. M.
Zong, Synth. Commun., 35, 97 (2005). b) X. S. Wang, D. Q. Shi,
Y. F. Zhang, S. H. Wang, and S. J. Tu, Chin. J. Org. Chem., 24,
430 (2004).
12 The general procedure is represented as follow: A suspension of a
mixture of N-benzilidenenaphthalen-2-amine 1 (2 mmol), 4-hydroxy-
coumarins or 4-hydroxyquinolin-2-one 2 (2 mmol) and TEBAC
(0.1 g) was stirred in water (10 mL) at 100 ꢁC for several hours. After
completion monitored by TLC, the reaction mixture was allowed to
cool to room temperature. The crystalline power formed recrystal-
lized from DMF and water to give pure 3. 3a: mp >300 ꢁC (Lit.3a,
378–380 ꢁC). IR (KBr, ꢀ, cmꢂ1): 3310, 3056, 1657, 1621, 1588,
1570, 1527, 1511, 1478, 1430, 1404; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, ꢁ):
5.91 (s, 1H, CH), 7.30 (d, J ¼ 8:8 Hz, 2H, ArH), 7.37–7.40 (m,
4H, ArH), 7.46–7.50 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.64–7.68 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.73
(d, J ¼ 8:8 Hz, 2H, ArH), 7.88 (d, J ¼ 7:6 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.91–
7.98 (m, 2H, ArH), 8.39 (d, J ¼ 7:2 Hz, 1H, ArH), 10.18 (s, 1H,
NH); Anal. Calcd for C26H16BrNO2: C, 68.74; H, 3.55; N, 3.08%;
Found: C, 68.92; H, 3.54; N, 3.13%. 3k: mp >300 ꢁC; IR (KBr, ꢀ,
cmꢂ1): 3648, 3329, 3064, 1667, 1639, 1621, 1590, 1570, 1531,
1460, 1406; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, ꢁ): 6.32 (s, 1H, CH), 7.03–7.08
(m, 2H, ArH), 7.26–7.35 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.44–7.51 (m, 3H, ArH),
7.71 (d, J ¼ 8:8 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.82 (d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz, 1H, ArH),
7.83 (d, J ¼ 8:8 Hz, 1H, ArH), 8.26 (d, J ¼ 8:4 Hz, 1H, ArH),
8.35 (d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz, 1H, ArH), 9.65 (s, 1H, NH), 11.15 (s, 1H,
NH); Anal. Calcd for C26H17ClN2O: C, 76.37; H, 4.19; N, 6.85%.
Found: C, 76.22; H, 4.18; N, 6.90%.
Though the detailed mechanism of the above reaction has
not been clarified yet, the formation of 3 can be explained by
the possible mechanism presented in Scheme 2.
In the further study, we find the product 3a can be obtained
in 82% yield by three-component reaction of 4-bromobenzalde-
hyde, 2-aminonaphthalene, and 2 in water at 100 ꢁC in the pres-
ence of TEBAC.14 This result possibly indicates that the cleav-
age of the C=N bond maybe take place in the mechanism men-
tioned above. But it should be noted that in this three-component
reaction the starting material of solid 4-bromobenzaldehyde al-
ways stays in the bottom of the condenser when the reaction tem-
perature is controlled above 80 ꢁC, which reduces the reaction
yield badly, meanwhile the reaction time is long.
In addition, in order to show the general scope of this reac-
tion, we also tried the reaction of 2 with other Schiff base con-
taining substituented aniline, such as p-toluidine. But we could
not get the expected pyrido[3,2-c]chromene derivative, we think
a possible reason is that the activity of p-toluidine is less than
that of 2-aminonaphthalene.
13 Crystal data for 3a: C26H16BrNO2; Mr ¼ 454:31, orange-yellow
block crystals, 0:59 ꢃ 0:34 ꢃ 0:15 mm3, monoclinic, space group
In conclusion, an efficient green chemistry method for the
synthesis of chromeno[4,3-b]benzo[ f]quinoline and quinolino
[4,3-b]benzo[ f]quinoline derivatives. Compared to other meth-
ods,3 this new method has the advantages of high yields, mild
reaction conditions, easy work-up, inexpensive reagents and
environmentally friendly procedure.
ꢀ
P21=c, a ¼ 7:3681ð8Þ, b ¼ 13:5483ð14Þ, c ¼ 19:662ð3Þ A, ꢂ ¼
Fð000Þ ¼ 920, ꢃ(Mo Kꢄ) = 2.153 mmꢂ1
100:372ð4Þꢁ, V ¼ 1930:7ð4Þ A , Z ¼ 4, Dcalcd ¼ 1:563 gꢄcmꢂ3
.
. Intensity data were
ꢀ 3
collected on Rigaku Mercury diffractometer using ! scan mode
with 3:01ꢁ < ꢅ < 27:48ꢁ. 4412 unique reflections were measured
and 3827 reflections with I > 2ꢆðIÞ were used in the refinement.
Structure solved by direct methods and expanded using Fourier
techniques. R ¼ 0:0446, wR ¼ 0:0968.
We are grateful to the Foundation (04KJB150139) of the
Education Committee of Jiangsu Province for financial support.
14 The general three-component reaction procedure for 3a is described
as follows: A suspension of a mixture of 4-bromobenzaldehyde
(2 mmol), 2-aminonaphthalene (2 mmol), 4-hydroxycoumarin 2
(2 mmol), and TEBAC (0.1 g) was stirred in water (10 mL) at
100 ꢁC for 24 h. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room
temperature. The solid was purified by column chromatogaraphy
on silica gel (200–300 mesh) using petroleum ether (bp 60–
90 ꢁC)–acetone (1:1) as eluent to give 3a in 82% yield.
References and Notes
1
A. Arcadi, M. Chiarini, S. D. Giuseppe, and F. Marinelli, Synlett,
2003, 203.
2
a) H. Horino, T. Mimura, K. Kagechika, M. Ohta, H. Kubo, and
M. Kitagawa, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 46, 602 (1998). b) R. Mannhold,
Published on the web (Advance View) August 28, 2005; DOI 10.1246/cl.2005.1316