shown that the C-O bond dissociation energy correlates with
the C-radical stability.7 Alkoxyamines derived from nonsta-
bilized C-radicals have strong C-O bonds and are therefore
prevented from undergoing C-O bond homolysis. Thus,
thermal reversible homolysis of an alkoxyamine 4 derived
from a stabilized radical R1 will generate R1, which in turn
can react with an olefin CH2dCHR2 to afford radical adduct
5 (Scheme 2). If 5 is a nonstabilized radical, irreversible
prepared via enolate oxidation using CuCl2 in the presence
of TEMPO (see Supporting Information). Pleasingly, reaction
of 10 with 1-octene (5 equiv) in t-BuOH at 135 °C for 3
days afforded 12 in 35% yield (Table 1, run 1). As a side
Table 1. Reaction of 10 and 11 with Various Olefins (5 equiv)
at 135 °C for 3 days
Scheme 2. PRE in Intermolecular Addition Reactions
run
R1
R2
compd
solvent
t-BuOH
MeOH
CH3CO2Et
DMF
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
C6H13
C6H13
C6H13
C6H13
C6H13
C6H13
C6H13
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
35a
25
55
46
63
64
66
54
72b
76c
49
78
69b
C6H5Cl
trapping with TEMPO will eventually provide 6. Since the
generation of radical R1 is a reversible process, it has a longer
formal lifetime, and the method should particularly be useful
for slow intermolecular radical additions.8
C6H5CF3
ClCH2CH2Cl
t-BuOH
t-BuOH
t-BuOH
ClCH2CH2Cl
ClCH2CH2Cl
t-BuOH
ClCH2CH2Cl
t-BuOH
t-Bu C6H13
t-Bu C6H13
The first experiments were performed using 1-octene as a
radical acceptor. The reactions were conducted in t-BuOH
(1 M, sealed tube) at 135 °C with a 5-fold excess of the
olefin. However, none of the desired products were obtained
using the alkoxyamines 7 and 8. The intermolecular addition
of the stable radicals derived from 7 and 8 to 1-octene is
too slow to compete with TEMPO trapping. We therefore
studied the intermolecular addition of the more reactive
tertiary butyl radical using alkoxyamine 9. Tertiary alkyl
radicals react with 1-octene about 2 orders of magnitude
faster than secondary benzylic radicals.9 However, addition
did not occur. The activation energy for efficient C-O bond
homolysis in 9 is too large.7 Furthermore, tertiary alkyl-
TEMPO compounds are not sufficiently stable under the
applied conditions (see below). Malonic ester derivatives
10 t-Bu C6H13
11 Me
12 Me
13 t-Bu OBu
14 Me
15 t-Bu (CH2)3OCO2Me
16 Me
17 t-Bu (CH2)3OTBDMS
CH2CH2Ph
OBu
(CH2)3OCO2Me
42
38b
70
(CH2)3OTBDMS
ClCH2CH2Cl
t-BuOH
55b
a Transesterification product formed in 36%; see text. b Reaction for 5
days. c Performed with 10 equiv of 1-octene.
product the corresponding tert-butyl methylmalonate derived
from monotransesterification of 12 with t-BuOH was formed
in 36% yield (see Supporting Information). To circumvent
the transesterification, the experiment was repeated in MeOH;
however, a lower yield was obtained (25%, run 2). Experi-
ments in ethyl acetate, DMF, trifluorotoluene, chlorobenzene,
and dichloroethane provided good results (runs 3-7). We
further studied the reaction using di-tert-butyl malonate 11
in t-BuOH as a solvent. Product 13 was isolated in 54% yield
along with 40% yield of 11 (run 8). Reaction for 5 days
under otherwise identical conditions afforded 13 in an
excellent yield (72%, run 9). Reaction time can be decreased
if 10 equiv of 1-octene is used (3 days, 76%, run 10). Thus,
the best results were obtained using malonate 10 in ClCH2-
CH2Cl or 11 in t-BuOH. These two protocols were used for
the following studies.
Figure 1. Various alkoxyamines studied.
have successfully been used in atom transfer reactions.10
Malonyl radicals are reactive in intermolecular addition
reactions9 and, due to their stability, should be readily
generated with our method. TEMPO-derivative 10 was easily
The reaction with 4-phenyl-1-butene (f 14), butyl vinyl
ether (f 15,16), CH2dCH(CH2)3OCO2Me (f 17,18), and
CH2dCH(CH2)3OTBDMS (f 19,20) provided the corre-
sponding addition products in moderate to good yields,
(7) Marque, S.; Fischer, H.; Baier, E.; Studer, A. J. Org. Chem. 2001,
66, 1146. See also: Marque, S.; Fischer, H.; LeMercier, C.; Tordo, P.
Macromolecules 2000, 33, 4403.
(8) Formal long-lived radicals due to degenerate processes: Zard, S. Z.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 672.
(10) Curran, D. P.; Chen, M.-H.; Spletzer, E.; Seong, C. M.; Chang,
C.-T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8872. Review: Byers, J. In Radicals
in Organic Synthesis; Renaud, P., Sibi, M. P., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
2001; Vol. 1, 72
(9) Fischer, H.; Radom, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1341.
2900
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 16, 2003