Withthe key intermediate3 in hand, the C and D rings of
1 were then constructed via Robinson annulation, which was
widely used in the synthesis of complex natural products.5À7
However, to the best of our knowledge, Robinson annula-
tion has not been utilized in the construction of the
[6À5À6] skeleton, because of the similar acidity of the
two benzylic positions of 3. Initially, construction of the C
ring was proceeded by treatment of 3 with ethyl vinyl ketone
or 10 under base conditions (K2CO3/MeOH, NaH or
EtONa, etc.); however, only a complex mixture was ob-
tained, owing to the similar acidity of H-8 and H-11. After
many trials, attention was then turned to acidic conditions.
We were pleased to find that when exposing 3 and 10 (1.5
equiv) to p-toluenesulfonic acid in refluxing toluene, the
desired tricycle 6 was obtained in 87% yield, together with
a small amount (<1%) of tetracycle 7, which could be
generated by the second Robinson annulation from com-
pound 6, and found that the percentage of tetracycle 7
increased with prolongation of the reaction time (Scheme 3).
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of (()-Dasyscyphin D
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Indanone 3
Scheme 3. Robinson Annulation of 3
addition of ethynylmagnesium bromide and afforded the
corresponding alcohol, which was further protected by
acetyl to obtain 4 in 95% yield (Scheme 2). Treatment of
ester 4 with 5 mol % PtCl2 intoluene underwent the desired
PtCl2-catalyzed pentannulation reaction and then acidic
hydrolysis to give the desired 2-indanone 3 in 72% yield.
(3) (a) Ohe, K.; Nakanishi, Y.; Miki, K. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 12138–
12148. (b) Miki, K.; Ohe, K.; Uemura, S. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8505–
8513 and reference cited therein.
(4) For selected pentannulation examples, see: (a) Bhanu Prasad,
B. A.; Yoshimoto, F. K.; Sarpong, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
12468–12469. (b) Brian, G. P.; Bhanu Prasad, B. A.; Sarpong, R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6786–6787. (c) Marco-Contelles, J.; Soriano, E.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2007, 13, 1350–1357. (d) Piers, E.; Renaud, J. J. Org.
Chem. 1993, 58, 11–13.
(5) (a) Kawanami, H.; Ikushima, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
5147–5150. (b) Frontier, A. J.; Raghavan, S.; Danishefsky, S. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6151–6159. (c) White, J. D.; Hrnciar, P.;
Stappenbeck, F. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7871–7884. (d) Paquette, L. A.;
Wang, T.-Z.; Sivik, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 11323–11334.
(e) Shi, B.; Hawryluk, N. A.; Snider, B. B. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
1030–1042.
(6) For construction of [6.6.6] core, see: (a) Buckbinder, L.; Haugeto,
A. I.; McNiff, P. A.; Millham, M. L.; Robinson, R. P. J. Med. Chem.
2009, 52, 1731–1743. (b) Gan, Y.; Spencer, T. A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
5870–5875. (c) Howell, F. H.; Taylor, D. A. H. J. Chem. Soc. 1958, 1248–
1254. (d) Howell, F. H.; Taylor, D. A. H. J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 1607–1613.
(e) Paquette, L. A.; Belmont, D. T.; Hsu, Y.-L. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
4667–4672. (f) Banerjee, A. K.; Azοcar, J. A. Synth. Commun. 1999, 29,
249–256. (g) Suryawanshi, S. N.; Fuchs, P. L. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51,
902–921.
(7) (a) Heathcock, C. H.; Mahaim, C.; Schlecht, M. F.; Utawanit, T.
J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 3264–3274. (b) Kerwin, S. M.; Paul, A. G.;
Heathcock, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 1686–1695. (c) Zoretic, P. A.;
Branchaud, B.; Maestrone, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 16, 527–528.
Even 7 could be obtained as the major product in 76% yield
by annulation of 3 with 2.5 equiv of 10 over 12 h in refluxing
toluene. Hydrogenation of 7 readily provided 9 in quantita-
tive yield. The structure of 9 was confirmed by single crystal
X-ray analysis. This finding featured construction of the C
and D ring in one step; although effective, the relative
configuration of CH3-18 and CH3-21 of 9 was cis, which
was not consistent with the natural Dasyscyphins’ skeleton.
ꢀ
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 11, 2011
2957