T. A. Jung, F. Diederich et al.
appear as bright protrusions,[16] while the DMA unit can be
identified as an oblong tail. It should be considered that in
STM the apparent height is not equivalent to the topograph-
ic height, but contributions from electronic states need also
to be taken into account. After TCNQ deposition, a new
protrusion in the vicinity of the tail and an amplification of
the DMA protrusion both indicate spontaneous TCNQ ad-
dition (Figure 1b). Furthermore, the appearance of a black
line through the porphyrin core illustrates a saddle-shape
conformation,[17] which leads to different apparent heights of
the tert-butyl groups and thereby creates conformational
chirality.[18] In our proposed adsorption model (Figure 1c)
two cyano groups of the expanded TCNQ interact with the
AuACHTUNGTRENNUNG(111) surface, consequently the p-quinodimethano moiety
points laterally, giving rise to the new protrusion next to the
former acetylene tail. The DMA moiety orientates away
from the surface, leading to an increase of its apparent
height (Figure 1b).
In addition to single molecules, self-assembled dimeric
structures were observed for both the reacted and the un-
reacted species (Figure 2). Unreacted porphyrin 1 forms
open dimers via van der Waals interactions, wherein the por-
phyrin molecules align in an antiparallel fashion with the
two acetylene tails pointing away from each other (Fig-
ure 2a). Upon mere adsorption of TCNQ onto the porphy-
rin-covered AuACHTUNGTRENNUNG(111) substrate, a new closed dimer of the re-
acted species 2 is observed (Figure 2b).[19] The former acety-
lene tails point towards each other and two bright protru-
sions between the two tails can be seen. In the dimeric ar-
rangement, the porphyrin core and its substituents give a
similar intramolecular contrast as observed for the single
molecule 2 (vide supra). The bright protrusion at the tail
can be assigned to the DMA and the p-quinomethano moi-
eties. Based on an STM series at different bias voltages (see
the Supporting Information), a tentative model was devel-
oped for the dimer. The DMA residues undergo electrostat-
ic interactions with the partially negatively charged malono-
nitrile unit of the expanded TCNQ. The reacted tails assem-
ble in an antiparallel fashion to minimize the overall dipole,
with the DMA moiety pointing slightly up and the p-quino-
methano moiety almost sliding underneath.
Several STM manipulation series substantiate the struc-
tural robustness of product 2 and corroborate its formation.
In manipulations of the product in its monomeric form, it
was possible to successively move and rotate the molecule
multiple times without affecting its structural integrity. The
dimeric structure could be rotated as a closed dimer, and
could also be split by moving or rotating one single porphy-
rin (see the Supporting Information).
Figure 2. STM images and model structures, generated with Spartan,[14]
for the self-assembled dimers on the AuACTHUNRGTNE(NUG 111) surface. a) Two unreacted
molecules 1 interact through van der Waals contacts of the di(tert-butyl)-
phenyl groups (scan size: 4ꢄ6 nm2, tunneling parameters: U=1.0 V, I=
10 pA). b) In the dimeric reacted species the partially positively charged
DMA units interact with partially negatively charged malononitrile units
(scan size: 4ꢄ6.4 nm2, tunneling parameters: U=1.0 V, I=25 pA). c) The
side view of the dimer model of the reacted species shows that the DMA
units are pointing slightly up, whereas the p-quinomethano moiety
almost slides underneath the DMA moiety. Di(tert-butyl)phenyl groups
are omitted in this picture for improved visibility.
(Figure 3) since less nitrogen atoms allow for higher reliabil-
ity in the assignment of signals. Additionally and in contrast
to porphyrin 2, which decomposes before sublimation,
TCNQ adduct 4 sublimes at approximately 1508C, allowing
direct comparison of XP spectra obtained from sublimed
TCNQ adduct 4 with the compound prepared on the sur-
face. Indeed, TCNQ adduct 4 formed on the surface exhib-
its identical peak shapes in the N1s spectra (Figure 3c and
Figure 3d) to those of the sublimed adduct 4. This distinct
congruence (overlay of the spectra: see the Supporting In-
formation) provides unambiguous evidence in favor of the
on-surface reaction of TCNQ with aniline 3 and thereby,
contributes to the XPS evidence provided for the on-surface
reaction of TCNQ with porphyrin 1. Here, good qualitative
agreement is observed between the N1s XPS spectra of por-
phyrin adduct 2 formed on the surface and the powder sam-
ples of 2 as obtained by solution synthesis (see the Support-
For X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measure-
ments,[20] the procedure of depositing TCNQ and porphyrin
1 on AuACHTUNGTRENNUNG(111) was replicated to reproduce the STM surface
conditions as precisely as possible with close to monolayer
coverages (general XPS conditions: see the Supporting In-
formation). To deconvolute the N1s core-level signal of por-
phyrin 1 before and after reaction with TCNQ, aniline 3 and
its TCNQ adduct 4 were studied as model compounds
5248
ꢃ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 5246 – 5250