catalytic or in stoichiometric amount. This nanoreactor is easy
to recover by simple filtration and washing. It can be reused,
with no loss in yield or enantioselectivity. Current efforts to
induce additional confinement effects will be reported in due
course.
We are grateful for the financial support from the
ANR-10-JCJC-0710-MOCER2.
Notes and references
1 (a) L. F. Tietze, G. Brasche and K. Gericke, in Domino Reactions in
Organic Synthesis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006; (b) M. Albert,
L. Fensterbank, E. Lacote and M. Malacria, Top. Curr. Chem.,
2006, 264, 1; (c) D. P. Curran, Aldrichimica Acta, 2000, 33, 105.
2 (a) B. M. Trost, Science, 1991, 254, 1471; (b) B. M. Trost, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 259.
Scheme 2
Table 3 Multi-substrates recycling in the rearrangement of enediynes
5a–da
3 M. Nechab, D. Campolo, J. Maury, P. Perfetti, N. Vanthuyne,
D. Siri and M. P. Bertrand, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 14742.
4 (a) T. Kawabata and K. Fuji, in Topics in Stereochemistry, ed.
S. E. Denmark, Wiley, New York, 2003, vol. 23, pp. 175–205;
(b) H. Zhao, D. C. Hsu and P. R. Carlier, Synthesis, 2005, 1;
(c) For seminal examples in radical chemistry, see: (d) B. Giese,
P. Wettstein, C. Stahelin, F. Barbosa, M. Neuburger, M. Zehnder
and P. Wessig, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 2586;
(e) A. J. Buckmelter, A. I. Kim and S. D. Rychnovsky, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 9386.
Entry
Substrate (ee)b
Time/h
%6c (ee%)b
%7c (ee%)b
1
2
3
4
5a (99)
5b (99)
5c (97)
5d (99)
4
2
2.5
2
21 (93)
58 (96)
35 (94)
36 (93)
62 (84)
29 (72)
53 (87)
50 (88)
a
Reaction conditions: 5 (0.34 mmol), Benzene (10 mL), GA-SBA15
b
c
(0.7 mmol), 80 1C. Determined by chiral HPLC. Isolated yield.
5 F. Hoffmann and M. Froba, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 608
¨
(special issue dedicated to hybrid materials).
Finally, the cascade rearrangement was achieved using
20 mol% loading of GA-SBA15. Under these conditions, only
the reaction time was changed, neither the diastereoselectivity
nor the enantioselectivity were affected (Table 4). Time needed
for completion was 13.5 h instead of 10 h for the cyclo-
aromatisation of 1a (entry 1), which indicated that the procedure
was still very efficient. Substrate 1b afforded 2b (33%, 81% ee),
3b (42%, 80% ee) and 4b (21%) after 8 h (entry 2).
6 M. Tada and Y. Iwasawa, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2007, 251,
2702.
7 (a) Q. Wang and D. F. Shantz, J. Catal., 2010, 271, 170;
(b) H.-T. Chen, S. Huh, J. W. Wiench, M. Pruski and
V. S.-Y. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 13305;
(c) D.-H. Lee, J.-Y. Jung and M.-J. Jin, Green Chem., 2010,
12, 2024; (d) C. M. Crudden, M. Sateesh and R. Lewis, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 10045; (e) Y. Huang, S. Xu and S.-Y. Lin,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 661.
In contrast to the stoichiometric reaction, in the case of 5a,
the catalytic procedure led to 6a as the major diastereomer
(60%) and 7a was isolated in 30% yield as the minor diastereo-
isomer (entry 3). This could be explained by the slowing down
of the rate of epimerisation under catalytic conditions (entry 1,
Table 3). Due to the faster epimerisation of the product, the
cyclization of 5b gave almost the same results as the stoichio-
metric process (entry 4). Similar observations apply to the
rearrangement of pyroglutamic derivatives 5c and 5d. By the
way, we did succeed in performing a catalytic process with
yields as high as those obtained with 2 equivalents of base
without any loss of the enantioselectivity.
8 (a) J. M. Thomas and R. Raja, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 708;
(b) J. M. Fraile, J. I. Garcıa, C. I. Herrerıas, J. A. Mayoral and
´ ´
E. Pires, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 695; (c) C. Li, H. Zhang,
D. Jiang and Q. Yang, Chem. Commun., 2007, 223; (d) R. de
´
Miguel, E. Brule and R. G. Margue, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1, 2001, 3085; (e) H. Yang, L. Zhang, P. Wang, Q. Yang and C. Li,
Green Chem., 2009, 11, 257; (f) A. Fuerte, A. Corma and
´
F. Sanchez, Catal. Today, 2005, 107–108, 404.
9 Y. Huang, B. G. Trewyn, H.-T. Chen and V. S.-Y. Lin, New J.
Chem., 2008, 32, 1311.
10 (a) J. P. Da Silva, S. Jockusch, J. M. G. Martinho, M. F. Ottaviani
and N. J. Turro, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 3062; (b) A. Moscatelli,
Z. Liu, X. Lei, J. Dyer, L. Abrams, M. F. Ottaviani and
N. J. Turro, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 11344 and previous
references cited therein; (c) M. K. Kidder, P. F. Britt,
A. L. Chaffee and A. C. Buchanan, Chem. Commun., 2007, 52;
(d) A. K. Sundaresan and V. Ramamurthy, Photochem. Photobiol.
Sci., 2008, 7, 1555.
In conclusion, mesoporous silica grafted with a tertiary
amino group is very efficient to promote in confined medium
the enantioselective cascade rearrangement of enediynes, in
11 For the unique example of Bergman cyclisation, see: X. Yang,
Z. Li, J. Zhi, J. Ma and A. Hu, Langmuir, 2010, 26, 11244.
12 (a) M. Kar and A. Basak, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 2861;
(b) D. S. Rawat and J. M. Zaleski, Synlett, 2004, 393;
(c) K. K. Wang, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 207; (d) J. W. Grissom,
G. U. Gunawardena, D. Klingberg and D. Huang, Tetrahedron,
1996, 52, 6453.
Table 4 Rearrangement of enediynes 1 and 5 using 20 mol % of
GA-SBA15a
Entry Substrate (ee)b Time/h 6c or 2 % (ee%)b 7c or 3% (ee%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
1ad (88)
1bd (97)
5a (99)
5b (99)
5c (97)
5d (99)
13.5
8
13
5
13
5
30 (73)
33 (81)
60 (92)
61 (95)
34 (94)
40e (92)
44 (70)
42 (80)
30 (63)
31 (70)
56 (86)
60e (90)
13 (a) A. G. Myers and P. S. Dragovich, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989,
111, 9130; (b) R. Nagata, H. Yamanaka, E. Okazaki and I. Saito,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1989, 30, 4995.
14 For elegant examples of biradicals rearrangements, see:
K. K. Wang, in Modern Allene Chemistry, ed. N. Krause and
A. S. K. Hashmi, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2004, p. 1091, vol. 2, and
references cited therein.
a
Reaction conditions:
1 or 5 (0.184 mmol), benzene (4 mL),
b
15 Similar results were obtained with Et3N (pKa = 11), but other
substrates like 5b led to faster epimerisation (pKaGA-SBA15 =
8.5). In addition, under homogeneous conditions, in CH3CN,
1b led to a significant amount of side-products.
GA-SBA15 (0.037 mmol, 20%), 80 1C. Determined by chiral
HPLC. Isolated yield. 21% of 4 was also isolated after cyclization.
c
d
e
NMR ratio, completed reaction was performed on 0.033 mmol.
c
5288 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 5286–5288
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011