substituents on the boron atom;16 (2) further limitations
arise from the ruthenium complex reactivity: in fact the
Murai catalyst (RuH2(CO)(PPh3)3) is involved in other
catalytic reactions, such as the conversion of nitroarenes
into tertiary amines,17 the rearrangement of oximes into
amides,18 transfer hydrogenation processes,19 and many
others;20 thus a consistent number of functional groups,
such as for example the already cited nitroarenes, internal
triple bonds, alcohols, and enones, must be avoided to
prevent side reactions; (3) even though the ortho-functio-
nalization of PDIs proves the possibility of choice to
address the 2,5,8,11-positions selectively, until now only
the formation of CꢀC bonds was demonstrated.
Figure 1. Perylenediimide.
To overcome these problems in our group we developed
a facile and straightforward synthesis of 2,5,8,11-tetra-
boronate PDIs, suitable building blocks for an extension
of the chemistry of the ortho-positions. The accessibility of
these sites is obtained, as in the previously reported
alkylation and arylation reactions of PDIs, using the
Murai catalyst. At the same time these systems were also
synthesized by the group of Shinokubo via an iridium
catalyzed borylation reaction.21
In 2009 a successful method for the selective functiona-
lization of the 2,5,8,11-positions of PDI (defined as ortho-
positions, Figure 1) was developed.12 Via ruthenium cata-
lyzed reactions between perylenediimides and terminal
alkenes or arylboronates it becomes possible to obtain
regioselectively tetraalkylated or tetraarylated PDIs; opti-
cal and electronic properties can be successfully tuned
without loss of the perylene core planarity. Enhanced
solubility and higher solid state fluorescence compared to
the unsubstituted parent compounds were demonstrated.13
Further, alkylation of the ortho positions suppresses inter-
molecular aggregation as well as the formation of inter-
molecular excited states between PDI molecules, yielding
an unprecedented photovoltaic power efficiency of poly-
thiophene:PDI blends.14
Nevertheless the synthetic method for the decoration of
the 2,5,8,11-positions still presents major disadvantages:
(1) the number of terminal alkenes and aryl boronates that
can be used in these reactions remains limited; olefins with
allylic hydrogens for example undergo rapid isomeriza-
tion and consequently give lower reaction yields15 whereas
the arylation procedure works in high yields with aryl
neopentylglycol boronates, but not as efficiently with other
A PDI and bis(pinacolato)diboron are mixed together
and dissolved in a mesitylene/pinacolone mixture. The
ruthenium catalyst is added to the reaction, and after
heating for 30 h at 140 °C the desired product is obtained
and isolated after chromatographic purification. This pro-
cedure is applied to PDIs 1a, 1b, and 1c. As already reported
in literature,12 the ruthenium catalyzed 2,5,8,11-functiona-
lization proceeds with higher yields in the presence of
sterically less demanding imide substituents, as in the case
of compounds a and b (60% and 70% yield, respectively,
Scheme 1). In the case of c, the desired tetraboronate is
formed in lower yields and cannot be isolated from the
mixture of mono-, bi-, and trisubstituted PDI.
Scheme 1. Ruthenium Catalyzed Borylation of PDIs
(12) (a) Nakazono, S.; Imazaki, Y.; Yoo, H.; Yang, J.; Sasamori, T.;
ꢀ
Tokitoh, N.; Cedric, T.; Kageyama, H.; Kim, D.; Shinokubo, H.; Osuka,
A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 7530. (b) Nakazono, S.; Easwaramoorthi, S.;
Kim, D.; Shinokubo, H.; Osuka, A. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5426.
(13) Bullock, J. E.; Vagnini, M. T.; Ramanan, C.; Co, D. T.; Wilson,
T. M.; Dicke, J. W.; Marks, T. J.; Wasielewski, M. R. J. Phys. Chem. B
2010, 114, 1794.
(14) Kamm, V.; Battagliarin, G.; Howard, I. A.; Pisula, W.; Mavrinskiy,
€
A.; Li, C.; Mullen, K.; Laquai, F. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 137.
(15) Kakiuchi, F.; Chatani, N. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 1077.
(16) Kakiuchi, F.; Matsuura, Y.; Kan, S.; Chatani, N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 5936.
(17) Feng, C.; Liu, Y.; Peng, S.; Shuai, Q.; Deng, G.; Li, C.-J. Org.
Lett. 2010, 12, 4888.
(18) Owston, N. A.; Parker, A. J.; Williams, J. M. J. Org. Lett. 2007,
9, 3599.
(19) Maytum, H. C.; Tavassoli, B.; Williams, J. M. J. Org. Lett. 2007,
9, 4387.
(20) (a) Anand, N.; Owston, N. A.; Parker, A. J.; Slatford, P. A.;
Williams, J. M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 7761. (b) Hall, M. I.;
Pridmore, S. J.; Williams, J. M. J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 1975.
(c) Han, H.; Krische, M. J. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2844. (d) Pridmore, S. J.;
Slatford, P. A.; Daniel, A.; Whittlesey, M. K.; Williams, J. M. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 5115. (e) Shibahara, F.; Bower, J. F.;
Krische, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14120. (f) Slatford, P. A.;
Whittlesey, M. K.; Williams, J. M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 6787.
(g) Ueno, S.; Mizushima, E.; Chatani, N.; Kakiuchi, F. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 16516.
The proposed reaction mechanism is presented in
Scheme 2, and it is similar to the one reported by Kakiuchi
and Chatani for the ruthenium catalyzed arylation of aro-
matic ketones.16 Also in this case, to increase reaction yields,
pinacolone is used as a cosolvent to act as a scavenger of
(21) Teraoka, T.; Hiroto, S.; Shinokubo, H. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2532.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 12, 2011
3013