M. Sathishkumar et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 2830–2833
2833
Table 3 (continued)
Entry
R-(1a–m)
R1N3 (2a–d)
RCONHR1 (3a–x)
Yielda(%) MAS (GBAS)
O
O
O
N
H
19
2a
77 (78)
1j
3s
OCH3
OCH3
OCH3
O
H3CO
H3CO
NH
b
20
21
2c
67 (69)
77 (81)
OCH3
#
1m
3t
H
N
CH2
2d
O
1c
Br
3u
a
Isolated yield.
Biologically potent compound.
b
Supplementary data
R1-N3
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
O
RCONHR1
R-COOH
-
2
O
3a-u
1
RCOO
R
Ph3P NR1
+
Ph3P
Ph3P
+
+
NHR1
Ph3P NH R1
-N2
Phosphazene
Ph3PO
References and notes
Scheme 3. Plausible mechanism.
1. (a) Montalbetti, C. A. G. N.; Falque, V. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 10827; (b) Ghose, A.
K.; Viswanadhan, V. N.; Wendoloski, J. J. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 55.
2. (a) Heal, W.; Mark Thompson, J.; Mutter, R.; Cope, H.; Louth, J. C.; Chen, B. J.
Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 1347; (b) Dunn, P. J.; Galvin, S.; Hettenbach, K. Green
Chem. 2004, 6, 43; (c) Petersson, M. J.; Marchal, C.; Loughlin, W. A.; Jenlins, I. D.;
Healy, P. C.; Almesaker, A. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 1395; (d) Kadam, S. T.; Kim, S.
S. Synthesis 2008, 2, 267.
3. Green Chemistry. Frontiers in Chemical Synthesis and Processes; Anastas, P. T.,
Williamson, T. C., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1988.
4. (a) Letavic, M. A.; Kiev, S. Ly. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 2339; (b) Lagerlund, O.;
Mette, L.; Mantel, H.; Larhed, M. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 7646.
5. (a) Narender, N.; Srinivasu, P.; Kulkarni, S. J.; Raghavan, K. V. Green Chem. 2000,
2, 104; (b) Bures, J.; Martin, M.; Urpi, F.; Vilarrasa, J. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74,
2203; (c) Luque, R.; Budarin, V.; Clark, J. H.; Macquarrie, D. J. Green Chem. 2009,
11, 459.
6. (a) Staudinger, H.; Meyer, J. Helv. Chim. Acta 1919, 2, 635; (b) Gololobov, Yu. G.;
Zhmurova, I. N.; Kasukhin, L. F. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 437; (c) Gololobov, Yu. G.;
Kasukhin, L. F. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 1353.
7. (a) Garica, J.; Urpi, F.; Vilarrasa, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 4841; (b) Kovacs,
L.; Osz, E.; Domokos, V.; Holzer, W.; Gyorgydesk, Z. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 4609;
(c) Malkinson, J. P.; Falconer, R. A.; Toth, I. J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5249; (d)
Urpi, F.; Vilarrasa, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 4623.
8. (a) Shalev, D. E.; Chiacchiera, S. M.; Radkowsky, A. E.; Kosower, E. M. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 1689; (b) Bosch, I.; Gonzalez, A.; Urpi, F.; Vilarrasa, J. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 5638.
increase of the reaction rate under microwave irradiation affording
an excellent yield of 3e as compared to the long reaction time
5–36 h) noted for the synthesis of 3e in solvents (Table 1). The
broad scope of the optimized MAS was established by conveniently
coupling three types of azides—primary, secondary, and aryl azides
(2a–d)11 with a variety of carboxylic acids viz aliphatic, aromatic,
heteroaromatic, and unsaturated carboxylic acids (1a–m)11 to
afford the respective amides (3a–u).12 Trimethoxycinnamic amide,
3t a potent inhibitor against four human tumor cell lines13 has been
obtained in good yield (Table 3).
Additionally an industrially prevalent glycerol bath, preheated
on a heating mantle to 180–190 °C, was used as an alternative to
microwave heating, to attain the optimum temperature for synthe-
sizing amides (3) under solvent-free condition. This was successful
affording identical yields (Table 3) as obtained in the MAS indicat-
ing the general applicability of GBAS.
The scale-up of the microwave accelerated and preheated glyc-
erol bath accelerated synthesis of amides 3e and 3f to 5 mmol and
15 mmol, respectively, was also performed successfully. In the
present study the rapid increase in the rate of amide bond forma-
tion is explained based on the high contacts/collapsing of polar
reactants in homogenous fused phase under solvent-free condi-
tion. The plausible mechanism (Scheme 3) is presented.
In conclusion, a solvent-free protocol for the synthesis of
amides via coupling of phosphazenes with carboxylic acids is sub-
mitted in view of a number of limitations associated with solution
phase synthesis. This methodology overcomes the limitations asso-
ciated with the solution phase approach.
9. Polshettiwar, V.; Varma, R. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 629.
10. Reaction progress was monitored by 1H NMR from the disappearance of the
methine proton signal of –CHN@PPh3 (Phosphazenes) at 4.0 ppm and
appearance of methine signal of—CHNHCOR (amide) at 4.6 ppm.
11. All carboxylic acids (1a–m) and triphenyl phosphine used are of commercial
grade of high purity and preparation of organic azides (2a–d) are presented in
Supplementary data.
12. General Procedure: To a well ground intimate mixture of triphenyl phosphine
(1.1 mmol) and carboxylic acid, 1 (1.0 mmol) in a microwave vial (10 mL)
equipped with a magnetic stirring bar, the organic azide, 2 (1.0 mmol) was
added in drops while stirring. Stirring was continued until liberation of
nitrogen ceased and the reaction vessel was sealed with a septum. It was then
placed into the cavity of
a focused monomode microwave reactor (CEM
Discover, benchmate) and operated at 180 °C (temperature monitored by a
built-in IR sensor), power 80 W for 15 min. The reaction temperature was
maintained by modulating the power level of the reactor. Alternatively, the
microwave vial with the mixture was conventionally heated around 180 °C by
immersing in a preheated glycerol bath for 15 min. The reaction vessel was
then cooled to room temperature and the residue subjected to column
chromatography on silica (pet ether/ethyl acetate, 87:13). This resulted in the
isolation of pure amide, 3 Yield (67–88%).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank IRHPA, DST for providing 300 MHz NMR
instrument for recording the NMR spectra.
13. Yang, X. D.; Zeng, X. H.; Zhao, Y. H.; Wang, X. Q.; Pan, Z. Q.; Li, L.; Zhang, H. B. J.
Comb. Chem. 2010, 12, 307.