1728
P. Deveci et al. / Polyhedron 30 (2011) 1726–1731
3400 (O–H), 3184 (N–H), 3030 (C–Harom.), 2980 (C–Haliph.), 1648
(C@N), 1514 (C@C), 988 (N–O). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6), d (ppm):
3.41 (t, 4H, CH2N), 3.48 (bs, 4H, CH2O), 3.52 (bs, 4H, CH2O), 3.58
(t, 4H, CH2O), 6.74 (dd, 2H, ArH), 6.47 (dd, 2H, ArH), 7.37 (s, 1H,
CH), 7.46 (s, 1H, NH), 10.41 (s, 1H, OH), 11.32 (s, 1H, OH). 13C
NMR (DMSO-d6), d (ppm): 52.8, 68.8, 69.7, 70.1, 71.0, 111.6,
124.7, 130.2, 143.0, 144.3, 146.4.
5.38; N, 10.78%. MS (fragments are based on 66Zn and 35Cl): m/z
515.2630 (MH)+; (Calc. 515.1163). FT-IR max/cmꢁ1): 3258
(O–H), 3210 (N–H), 3030 (C–Harom.), 2981 (C–Haliph.), 1612 (C@N),
1515 (C@C), 978 (N–O) cmꢁ1 1H NMR (DMSO-d6), d (ppm): 3.39
(s, 2H, H2O), 3.40–3.59 (m, 20H, CH2CH2O, CH2CH2N), 6.73 (dd,
2H, ArH), 6.46 (dd, 2H, ArH), 7.50 (s, 1H, NH), 7.36 (s, 1H, CH),
11.33 (s, 1H, OH), .13C NMR (DMSO-d6), d (ppm): 52.7, 68.7, 69.6,
70.1, 70.9, 111.5, 124.7, 130.1, 142.8, 144.2, 146.4.
(
m
.
2.4. Synthesis of the complexes; Ni(LH)2, Cu(LH)2, Co(LH)2(H2O)2,
[Cd(LH)(H2O)(Cl)], [Zn(LH)(H2O)(Cl)]
2.5. Electrochemical studies
A solution of NiCl2ꢂ6H2O (0.059 g, 0.25 mmol), CuCl2ꢂ2H2O
(0.043 g, 0.25 mmol) CoCl2ꢂ6H2O (0.059 g, 0.25 mmol), ZnCl2
(0.07 g, 0.50 mmol) or CdCl2ꢂ2H2O (0.114 g, 0.50 mmol) in water
(5 mL) was added to a solution of LH2 (0.19 g, 0.50 mmol) in
5 mL ethanol at room temperature. A distinct change in color and
a decrease in the pH of the solution (3.5–4.0) was observed. While
stirring at the same temperature, NaOH (1%) was added in order to
increase the pH to 7. The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min at
room temperature. The precipitate was filtered off, washed several
times with water, and then dried in vacuum.
Glassy carbon electrodes were prepared by first polishing them
with fine wet emery papers grain size 4000 (Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL,
USA) followed by a 0.1 lm and 0.05 lm alumina slurry on a polish-
ing pad (Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA), to give them a mirror-like
appearance. The electrodes were sonicated for 5 min in water
and in 50:50 (v/v) isopropyl alcohol and acetonitrile (IPA + MeCN)
solution purified over activated carbon. Before the electrochemical
experiments, the electrodes were dried with an argon gas stream
and the solutions were purged with pure argon gas (99.999%) at
least for 10 min and an argon atmosphere was maintained over
the solution during experiments. Electrochemical studies of the
compounds were performed in a solution of 1 mM LH2 and its com-
plexes, in 0.1 M TBATFB in DMSO versus an Ag/Ag+ (0.01 M) refer-
ence electrode using CV with a scan rate of 200 mV sꢁ1 between
1 V and ꢁ2.5 V.
2.4.1. Ni(LH)2
Yield: 0.16 g (75%) and m.p.: 258 °C. Anal. Calc. for C36H54N8O12-
Ni: C, 50.92; H, 6.41; N, 13.19. Found: C, 50.72; H, 6.34; N, 13.12%.
MS (fragments are based on 58Ni, 60Ni and 62Ni): m/z 849.3603
(MH)+, 850.3623 and 853.3575; (Calc. 849.3287, 850.3317 and
853.3254). FT-IR (m
max/cmꢁ1): 3132 (O–H), 3120 (N–H), 3008 (C–
2.6. Determination of antibacterial activities
H
arom.), 2992 (C–Haliph.), 1717 (O–Hꢂ ꢂ ꢂO), 1613 (Cꢂ ꢂ ꢂN), 1518
(Cꢂ ꢂ ꢂC), 976 (N–O). 1H NMR (CDCl3), d (ppm): 3.75 (m, 8H, CH2N),
3.80 (bs, 8H, CH2O), 3.83 (bs, 8H, CH2O), 3.90 (m, 8H, CH2O), 6.74
(s, 2H, CH), 6.76 (s, 2H, NH), 7.06–7.09 (m, 8H, ArH), 14.64 (s, 2H,
O–Hꢂ ꢂ ꢂO). 13C NMR (CDCl3), d (ppm): 52.06, 67.93, 69.10, 69.50,
70.36, 111.34, 125.68, 128.25, 143.50, 145.20, 146.05.
The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined
by broth microdilution methods in Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB)
(Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) with an inoculum of approximately
5 ꢃ 105 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL, according to CLSI (Clinical
and Laboratory Standards Institute) guidelines (2009). The in vitro
antibacterial activity of the complexes was evaluated against stan-
dard strains; Staphylococcus aureus ATCC (American Type Culture
Collection) 29213, Streptococcus mutans RSHM 676, Enterococcus
faecalis ATCC 29212, Lactobacillus acidophilus RSHM 06029, Esche-
richia coli ATCC 25922, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853.
The antibacterial activity was performed in MHB (Becton Dickin-
son, Sparks, MD). All the synthesized complexes were weighed
(10.24 mg) and dissolved in DMSO (10 mL) to prepare the stock
2.4.2. Cu(LH)2
Yield: 0.15 g (61%) and m.p.: 195 °C. Anal. Calc. for C36H54N8O12-
Cu: C, 50.61; H, 6.37; N, 13.11. Found: C, 50.55; H, 6.13; N, 13.34%.
MS (fragments are based on 63Cu and 65Cu): m/z 854.3528 (MH)+
and 856.3519; (Calc. 854.3230 and 856.3227), FT-IR (m
max/cmꢁ1):
3183 (O–H), 3142 (N–H), 3042 (C–Harom.), 2980(C–Haliph.),
1718(O–Hꢂ ꢂ ꢂO), 1614 (C@N), 1519 (C@C), 973 (N–O) cmꢁ1
.
solutions. The serial dilution from 256 to 0.25
lg/mL were made
2.4.3. Co(LH)2(H2O)2
in a 96 well plate. 100 L of a bacterial suspension, obtained from
l
Yield: 0.11 g (49%) and m.p.: >300 °C. Anal. Calc. for
a 24 h culture and containing ꢀ5 ꢃ 105 colony-forming units
(CFU)/mL was added to each well. The plate was incubated at
35 °C for 24 h. The data were reported as MICs, the lowest concen-
tration of antibiotic and complexes inhibiting visible growth after
24 h of incubation at 35 °C. For quality control of the method
ampicillin (IE Ulugay, Turkey), Genta (IE Ulugay, Turkey) and
Piperacillin (Wyeth) were tested as antimicrobial agents. These
experiments were carried out in duplicate.
C
36H58N8O14Co: C, 48.81; H, 6.60; N, 12.65. Found: C, 48.46; H,
6.65; N, 12.76%. MS (fragment is based on 59Co): 673.369 [M–
(C2H5N2O6Co)]+ (Calc. 673.462) FT-IR ( max/cmꢁ1): 3240 (O–H),
m
3140 (N–H), 3035 (C–Harom.), 2980 (C–Haliph.), 1716 (O–Hꢂ ꢂ ꢂO),
1600 (C@N), 1514 (C@C), 970 (N–O).
2.4.4. [Cd(LH)(H2O)(Cl)]
Yield: 0.10 g (35%) and m.p.: 212 °C. Anal. Calc. for
C
18H29N4O7ClCd: C, 38.32; H, 5.18; N, 9.93. Found: C, 38.51; H,
5.27; N, 10.02%. MS (fragments are based on 115Cd and 35Cl): m/z
3. Results and discussion
545.2880 (MꢁH2O)+; (Calc. 545.5514). FT-IR (
m
max/cmꢁ1): 3252
(O–H), 3210 (N–H), 3030 (C–Harom.), 2982 (C–Haliph.), 1612 (C@N),
1516 (C@C), 973 (N–O). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6), d (ppm): 3.36 (s,
2H, H2O), 3.39–3.57 (m, 20H, CH2CH2O, CH2CH2N), 6.70 (dd, 2H,
ArH), 6.39 (dd, 2H, ArH), 7.50 (s, 1H, NH), 7.36 (s, 1H, CH), 11.37
(s, 1H, OH), 13C NMR (DMSO-d6), d (ppm): 52.6, 68.9, 69.4, 70.2,
70.9, 111.3, 124.7, 130.4, 142.4, 144.1, 146.7.
3.1. FT-IR analysis
The IR spectrum of LH2 exhibits two sharp bands of medium
intensity at 1648 and 988 cmꢁ1 which are assigned to the
m
(C@N) and m(N–O) stretching vibrations, respectively [18]. A
broad band at 3184 cmꢁ1 is due to –NH stretching frequency. In
the IR spectra of all the complexes, the –NOH band of the corre-
sponding ligand observed at 3400 cmꢁ1 is absent due to hydrogen
bonding upon complexation and the azomethine frequency is
2.4.5. [Zn(LH)(H2O)(Cl)]
Yield: 0.53 g (65%) and m.p.: 189 °C. Anal. Calc. for
C18H29N4O7ClZn: C, 42.03; H, 5.68; N, 10.89. Found: C, 42.33; H,
shifted to a lower wave number, indicating the ligation of