with BS2 is driven by enthalpic and entropic contributions
that are different from those determined for the guest with the
longer spacer.
provided further insight on the structure of the capsule (Fig. 5
and S6, ESIz). Cross peaks between the Hc signals of the host
and the H1, H2 (Fig. 5 inset) and CH3 (Fig. S7, ESIz) protons
of the guest suggest that the two aromatic ends of BS2 are
deeply inserted into the calixarene cavities. As expected, only a
weak cross-peak was detected between the methylene protons
of the alkyl chain of the guest and the methyl groups of the
host. The correlation observed between the Ha and Hb signals
of the host and the H1, H2 and H3 signals of the guest further
confirms the spatial proximity of the components of the
capsule (Fig. 5). Interestingly, most of these NOESY correla-
tions can no longer be detected at H/G ratios lower than 3,
that is when the 1 : 1 complex is the main species in solution
(Fig. S5, ESIz).
The data so far collected indicate that whilst the formation
of the 1 : 1 species with BS2 is more exothermic than the
analogous species with BS1 by ca 10 kJ molꢁ1, the formation
of the capsule has a smaller enthalpic and a larger entropic
contribution; perhaps the closer proximity of the two hemi-
spheres is the main reason for the differences observed.
To further corroborate the speciation obtained through the
chemical shift values, we also resorted to diffusion NMR
spectroscopy (DOSY) since this technique has been found to
be an invaluable tool for the characterization of bulky supra-
molecular structures and highly symmetric non-covalent
aggregates in solution.12 DOSY experiments carried out at
different host/guest ratios (Fig. 4) show that, as increasing
amounts of the host are added, the self-diffusion coefficient of
the free guest dramatically drops as a consequence of its larger
size resulting in complex formation. Attempts to fit the
diffusion data by considering the HG model only proved to
be unsuccessful (Fig. 4). The ‘‘extrapolated’’ diffusion
coefficient for the HG species (3.3 ꢀ 0.1 ꢂ 10ꢁ10 m2 sꢁ1) is
smaller than that of free BS2 (4.4 ꢀ 0.1 ꢂ 10ꢁ10 m2 sꢁ1) but
significantly larger than the value found for the H2G species
(2.6 ꢀ 0.1 ꢂ 10ꢁ10 m2 sꢁ1) thus confirming the existence of a
bulkier complex in solution.13 Furthermore, ROESY NMR
spectra recorded at different TAC4/BS2 ratios markedly
display NOE interactions between host and guest signals and
We have shown that a gemini guest with a shorter spacer
(BS2 vs. BS1) still triggers the self-assembling of a more
compact homodimeric capsule (percentage of formation
>70%, Fig. S5, ESIz). The electrostatic interactions between
the opposite charges residing on the guest and the host and the
use of p–p interactions to give effective binding in water
confirm the surprising features of the system and suggest a
new strategy towards anion templated capsules in highly
competitive media like water. The successful trapping of BS1
and BS2 in water at neutral pH, albeit not a general example,
is suggestive of the possibility of yet to be discovered examples.
We are currently investigating gemini guests covering a range
of lengths of the spacer to examine their ability to act as
templating agents and thus trigger capsule formation.
We are grateful to MIUR (PRIN 2008F5A3AF_005) and
University of Catania for funding.
Notes and references
1 D. Philp and J. F. Stoddart, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35,
1154.
2 S. Liu and B. C. Gibb, Chem. Commun., 2008, 3709; V. M. Dong,
D. Fiedler, B. Carl, R. G. Bergman and K. N. Raymond, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 14464; M. Porel, N. Jayaraj,
S. Raghothama and V. Ramamurthy, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 4544;
S. J. Dalgarno, J. L. Atwood and C. L. Raston, Chem. Commun.,
2006, 4567; S. M. Biros and J. Rebek, Jr., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007,
36, 93 and references therein; C. Sgarlata, J. S. Mugridge,
M. D. Pluth, B. E. F. Tiedemann, V. Zito, G. Arena and
K. N. Raymond, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 1005.
3 P. Ballester, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 3810 and references therein.
4 S. Mason, J. M. Llinares, M. Morton, T. Clifford and K. Bowman-
James, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 1814; J. A. Aguilar,
T. Clifford, A. Danby, J. M. Llinares, S. Mason, E. Garcia-Espana
and K. Bowman-James, Supramol. Chem., 2001, 13, 405.
5 C. Sgarlata, C. Bonaccorso, F. G. Gulino, V. Zito, G. Arena and
D. Sciotto, New J. Chem., 2009, 33, 991.
Fig. 4 BS2 self-diffusion coefficients. Black full circles, experimental
data points; red broken line, HG model; blue solid line, HG + H2G model.
6 F. Corbellini, L. D. Costanzo, M. Crego-Calama, S. Geremia
and D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 9946.
7 C. Bonaccorso, A. Ciadamidaro, C. Sgarlata, D. Sciotto and
G. Arena, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 7139.
8 F. P. Schmidtchen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 3916.
9 K. M. Mullen and P. D. Beer, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1701.
10 G. V. Oshovsky, D. N. Reinhoudt and W. Verboom, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2006, 128, 5270.
11 Additional experiments are currently underway to improve the
accuracy of the ITC data.
12 Y. Cohen, L. Avram and L. Frish, Angew. Chem., 2005, 117, 524;
Y. Cohen, L. Avram and L. Frish, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005,
44, 520.
13 A satisfactory fit of the experimental data was obtained when using
the HG + H2G model only and gave log K values of 4.7 ꢀ 0.1 and
3.0 ꢀ 0.1 that nicely agree with those obtained through 1H NMR.
Fig. 5 2D ROESY (D2O, phosphate buffer, pD 7.1, H/G = 5);
off-diagonal peaks of interest are encircled.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6117–6119 6119