662
Z. Yan et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 79 (2011) 661–665
Scheme 1. Synthetic route and serial number of aromatic ring of the target compound.
2. Experimental
2.1. Reagents
Dibenzo-18-crown-6, p-amino benzoic acid and all the other
chemicals were of AR grade and were used as received from
Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. Water used throughout was
doubly deionized.
A 1.0 × 10−6 mol L−1 Hg2+ standard solution for testing was pre-
pared in doubly deionized water at room temperature and diluted
to appropriate concentration daily. 5.0 × 10−4 mol L−1 (BCADC)
stock solution was prepared in DMSO at room temperature and
stored at room temperature. NaAc–HAc or phosphate buffers were
prepared by the mixture of 0.01 mol L−1 of HAc solution and
0.01 mol L−1 of NaAc solution or 0.01 mol L−1 Na2HPO4 solution and
0.01 mol L−1 KH2PO4 solution to the desired pH.
Fig. 1. UV–vis absorption spectra of BCADC in the absence (- - -) and presence (––)
of Hg2+ (CHg = 5.8 × 10−6 mol L−1, pH 5.0; CBCADC = 5.0 × 10−5 mol L−1).
2+
flask. The mixture was stirred thoroughly and finally diluted to
10 mL with doubly deionized water. After incubating for 15 min,
the absorbance spectra were measured from 250 nm to 500 nm and
the band-slit was set as 2.0 nm. The ratio (A408/354) of the absorb-
ing intensity at 408 nm to that at 354 nm was used for quantitative
analysis.
2.2. Apparatus
IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer Model 882 infrared
spectrometer, mixed with KBr and pressed into pellets, scanning
from 4000 to 500 cm−1 1H NMR were recorded using a Bruker
.
AMX-400 spectrometer operating at 400 MHz, with tetramethyl-
silane(TMS) as a reference and DMSO-d6 as solvent. Elemental
analysis was conducted using an Elemental Vario EL-III apparatus.
UV–vis spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-265 spectrometer
using a 1-cm square quartz cell. All pH measurements were made
with a PHS-25 pH meter.
3. Results and discussion
The UV–vis absorption spectra of BCADC in the absence and
presence of Hg2+ in HAc-NaAc (pH 5.0) solutions were shown in
Fig. 1.
2.3. Preparations of BCADC
It can be seen from Fig. 1 that BCADC has two absorbance peaks
between 250 nm and 500 nm. The first absorption peak at 288 nm
is attributed to the – electron transition in non-conjugated p-
amino benzoic acid moiety. The second absorption peak at 354 nm
results in the – electron transition in the huge -conjugated
As shown in Scheme 1, p-amino benzoic acid (0.686 g, 5 mmol)
was dissolved in an ice–water solution of 15% sodium nitrite
(0.38 g, 5.5 mmol). After cooling to 0 ◦C, the solution was added
to concentrated hydrochloric acid (1.2 mL) and stirred for 30 min.
The excess nitrous acid was destroyed with about 5 mg urea.
The mixture was then added drop wise to 10 mL buffered
aqueous solution (KH2PO4/Na2HPO4, pH 6) containing dibenzo-
18-crown-6 (1.56 g, 5 mmol) and stirred for another 2 h at 0–5 ◦C.
The resultant precipitate was filtered and purified by column
chromatography on silica gel (eluent: petroleum methanol/ethyl
acetate = 1:9) to provide light yellow crystal BCADC in the yield of
68.5%.
system, N,N-di-phenyl azo, with εmax about 7.5 × 104 L mol−1 cm−1
.
In the presence of Hg2+, the absorbance at 288 nm keeps unchanged
nearly, however, the absorbance at 354 nm obviously red shifts to
Mp, 202–203 ◦C; IR (KBr), ꢀ (cm−1): 2500–3500 (–COOH), 1697
(C O), 1604 (N N), 1258 (C–O–C). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 Hz) ı
(ppm): 12.5 (s, 2H, COOH), 7.8 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 4H, H5), 7.5 (d, J = 8.4 Hz,
4H, H4), 7.0–6.8 (m, J = 5.6 Hz, 6H, H1,2,3), 4.1 (t, J = 2.7 Hz, 8H, CH2),
3.9 (t, J = 2.5 Hz, 8H, CH2). Anal. Calcd for C34H32N4O10: C, 62.19; H,
4.91; N, 8.53. Found: C, 62.73; H, 5.04; N, 9.01.
2.4. Procedures of detection
For Hg2+ detection, 1.0 mL HAc–NaAc (pH 5.0), 1.0 mL 5.0 ×
10−4 mol L−1 of BCADC and 1.0 mL of the appropriate concentra-
tion of Hg2+ solution were transferred into a 10 mL volumetric
Fig. 2. Effect of pH on the absorbance of BCADC at 408 nm (pH 5.0;
CBCADC = 5.0 × 10−5 mol L−1, CHg = 5.8 × 10−6 mol L−1).
2+