X.-h. Xie et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 373 (2011) 276–281
277
Table 1 listed details of the crystal parameters, data collection
and refinement for HL, 1 and 2. The selected bond distances and
angles for HL, 1 and 2 were listed in Tables 2–4.
Table 1
Crystallographic data for HL, 1, and 2.
Scheme 1. Generic triazenido binding modes and new triazenes.
Parameter
HL
1
2
Empirical formula
Formula weight
k (Å)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (Å)
C
13H12N4O2
C49H44ClN4O2P2Pt C51H43N3O4P2Pt
256.27
0.71073
monoclinic
P2(1)/c
1013.36
0.71073
monoclinic
P2(1)/c
1018.91
0.71073
orthorhombic
Pbca
neutralized with a 15% aqueous of CH3CO2Na to give a yellow pre-
cipitate. The reaction mixture was filtered, and the solid was puri-
fied by crystallization at ꢀ4 °C from 8:2 ethyl acetate/hexanes to
obtain yellow crystals, which were collected and dried in vacuo
(1.9 g, 71%). Anal. Calc. for C13H12N4O2: C, 60.9; H, 4.7; N, 21.9.
Found: C, 60.17; H, 5.04; N, 21.56%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm): d 8.58
(d, J = 1 Hz, 1H, py), 8.05 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H, Py), 7.96 (d, J = 2.8 Hz,
1H, Py), 7.82 (t, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H, Py), 7.60 (t, J = 2.7 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.25
(t, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.16 (t, J = 2.7 Hz, 1 Hz, Ar), 3.97 (s, 3H, –
OCH3).
15.064(3)
6.197(1)
27.545(6)
90.00
99.30(3)
90.00
12.355(3)
20.634(4)
17.305(4)
90.00
20.555(4)
20.730(4)
21.009(4)
90.00
b (Å)
c (Å)
a
(°)
b (°)
94.30(3)
90.00
90.00
90.00
c
(°)
Z
4
4
8
Dcalc (Mg mꢀ3
F(0 0 0)
)
1.342
1072
3.09–27.48
1.530
1.512
2028
4080
2.2.2. Synthesis of H2L0
The procedure was performed in the same way as that for the
synthesis of HL except that 2-aminopyridine was replaced by
o-aminobenzoic acid. H2L0 was obtained (52%). Anal. Calc. for
h Range for data
collection (°)
Reflections
collected/
unique
Data/restraints/
parameters
Goodness-of-fit
(GOF) on F2
Final R indices
3.08–25.34
3.23–25.35
21 893/5713
30 106/7787
87 771/8179
C
15H13N3O4: C, 60.20; H, 4.35; N, 14.05. Found: C, 60.26; H, 4.34;
5713/0/344
1.154
7787/0/533
1.148
8179/0/551
1.038
N, 14.10%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm): d 8.36 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H, Ar),
8.08 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.98 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.90 (d,
J = 3.6 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.62 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.45 (t, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H, Ar),
7.21 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1 Hz, Ar), 3.98 (s, 3H, –OCH3).
R1 = 0.1123,
wR2 = 0.3209
R1 = 0.1454,
wR2 = 0.3504
R1 = 0.0470,
wR2 = 0.1125
R1 = 0.0575,
wR2 = 0.1170
R1 = 0.0459,
wR2 = 0.1249
R1 = 0.0781,
wR2 = 0.1460
[I > 2r(I)]
R indices(all data)
2.2.3. Synthesis of Pt(PPh3)2(L)Cl (1)
To a solution, containing ligand HL (0.31 g, 1.2 mmol) and
triethylamine (0.12 g, 1.2 mmol) in CH3OH/CH2Cl2 (20 mL, 1:1),
Pt(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.76 g, 0.96 mmol) was added and stirred for
10 min. The solution was allowed to slowly evaporate to afford
yellow crystals, which were collected and dried in vacuo (0.38 g,
41.4%). Anal. Calc. for C49H44ClN4O2P2Pt: C, 58.03; H, 4.34; N,
5.53. Found: C, 58.14; H, 4.35; N, 5.51%. UV–Vis [CH3CN, kmax/nm
Table 2
Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°) for HL.
N(2)–N(3)
1.264(4)
1.423(5)
111.8(3)
119.6(3)
N(2)–N(1)
1.336(4)
1.372(5)
113.2(3)
N(3)–C(1)
N(1)–C(9)
N(3)–N(2)–N(1)
N(2)–N(1)–C(9)
N(2)–N(3)–C(1)
(e
/L molꢀ1 cmꢀ1)]: 244 (2.7 ꢁ 104), 376 (1.4 ꢁ 104). 31P NMR
(CD2Cl2, ppm): d 6.61 (d, 1P, JPtP = 1320 Hz), d 13.35 (d, 1P,
JPtP = 1663 Hz).
Table 3
Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°) for 1.
2.2.4. Synthesis of Pt(PPh3)2(L0) (2)
To a solution, containing ligand H2L0 (0.26 g, 0.89 mmol) and
triethylamine (0.10 g, 1.0 mmol) in CH3OH/CH2Cl2 (20 mL, 1:1),
Pt(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.60 g, 0.76 mmol) was added and stirred for
15 min. The solution was allowed to slowly evaporate to afford
yellow crystals, which were collected and dried in vacuo (0.42 g,
55.7%). Anal. Calc. for C51H43N3O4P2Pt: C, 60.06; H, 4.22; N, 4.12.
Pt(1)–N(1)
Pt(1)–P(1)
N(1)–N(2)
N(3)–N(2)
2.078(5)
2.2724(17)
1.309(7)
1.307(7)
Pt(1)–P(2)
Pt(1)–Cl(1)
N(1)–C(1)
N(3)–C(6)
2.2496(16)
2.3569(16)
1.385(9)
1.429(8)
N(1)–Pt(1)–P(2)
P(2)–Pt(1)–P(1)
P(2)–Pt(1)–Cl(1)
N(2)–N(1)–C(1)
C(1)–N(1)–Pt(1)
N(3)–N(2)–N(1)
89.93(15)
99.28(6)
174.90(6)
116.2(5)
120.3(4)
112.7(5)
N(1)–Pt(1)–P(1)
N(1)–Pt(1)–Cl(1)
P(1)–Pt(1)–Cl(1)
N(2)–N(1)–Pt(1)
N(2)–N(3)–C(6)
170.49(15)
85.81(15)
85.11(6)
123.0(4)
110.5(5)
Found: C, 59.93; H, 4.21; N, 4.13%. UV–Vis [CH3CN, kmax/nm (e/L
molꢀ1 cmꢀ1)]: 248 (3.1 ꢁ 104), 379 (1.7 ꢁ 104). 31P NMR (CD2Cl2,
ppm): d 5.28 (d, 1P, JPtP = 1657 Hz), d 8.96 (d, 1P, JPtP = 1282 Hz).
2.3. X-ray crystallography
Table 4
Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°) for 2.
Data were collected with a Bruker SMART CCD area detector
using graphite monochromated Mo K
a radiation (0.71073 Å) at
Pt(1)–N(1)
Pt(1)–P(2)
N(1)–N(2)
N(2)–N(3)
N(1)–Pt(1)–O(4)
O(4)–Pt(1)–P(2)
O(4)–Pt(1)–P(1)
N(2)–N(1)–C(1)
C(1)–N(1)–Pt(1)
2.040(5)
2.2396(18)
1.321(8)
1.267(7)
83.5(2)
Pt(1)–O(4)
Pt(1)–P(1)
N(1)–C(1)
2.061(5)
2.2997(18)
1.405(9)
room temperature. All empirical absorption corrections were ap-
plied by using the SADABS program [19]. The structures were solved
using direct methods and the corresponding non-hydrogen atoms
were refined anisotropically. All the hydrogen atoms of the ligands
were placed in calculated positions with fixed isotropic thermal
parameters and included in the structure factor calculations in
the final stage of full-matrix least-squares refinement. All calcula-
tions were performed using the SHELXTL computer program [20].
N(1)–Pt(1)–P(2)
N(1)–Pt(1)–P(1)
P(2)–Pt(1)–P(1)
N(2)–N(1)–Pt(1)
N(3)–N(2)–N(1)
94.13(17)
168.74(17)
96.02(7)
126.5(4)
115.4(6)
174.70(16)
86.74(15)
114.3(6)
118.6(5)