temperatures (90À140 °C),4,5 but the copper catalysts have
been largely supplanted by dirhodium catalysts, which
form the cyclopropenes under very mild conditions.6,7 In
recent years, several chiral dirhodium catalysts have been
developed for asymmetric cyclopropenation with acceptor
carbenoids.8
Effective cyclopropenation with acceptor/acceptor car-
benoids and donor/acceptor carbenoids is a more recent
development compared to the reactions with acceptor
carbenoids.9,10 Highly enantioselective cyclopropenation
of terminal alkynes has been achieved with cobalt,9a
iridium,9b and rhodium10aÀc catalysts, but the reactions
fail with disubstituted alkynes.10a Computational studies
of dirhodium catalysts indicate that the alkyne has close to
an end-on approach to the carbenoid with a deviation of
18.2° that would cause a steric clash for a disubstituted
alkyne. Furthermore the terminal hydrogen of the alkyne
interacts with the carboxylate ligands in the transition state
for cyclopropenation with donor/acceptor carbenoids.
This may explain why donor/acceptor carbenoids do not
cyclopropenate internal alkynes.10c
A potential way to overcome this limitation would be to
use more reactive types of donor/acceptor carbenoids.
Studies have shown that silver catalysts result in effective
reactions with donor/acceptor carbenoids.11 These silver
carbenoids do not undergoWolff rearrangements, which is
a common outcome for the silver catalyzed reactions of
acceptor carbenoids.12,13 Moreover, silver catalysts will
induce cyclopropanation by donor/acceptor carbenoids of
highly substituted olefins which were unreactive under
rhodium-catalyzed conditions.11a In this paper, we de-
scribe that silver catalysis is an excellent approach for the
cyclopropenation of internal alkynes with donor/acceptor
carbenoids.
yields using 10 mol % of silver(I) salts having loosely
bound counterions with silver triflate providing the highest
yield of 97% (Scheme 2). Only trace amounts of cyclopro-
pene product were obtained when silver(I) salts of moÀre
CO32À, PhCO2À, SO42À) were used as a catalyst. These
results were consistent with the trend observedin the silver-
catalyzed cyclopropanation of styrene with 5.11a
tightly bound counterions (i.e., NO3À, PO43À, CF3CO2
,
Scheme 2
Acceptor- and acceptor-/acceptor-substituted diazo
compounds were also utilized as carbenoid precursors to
determine the effect of the carbenoid structure on the
silver-catalyzed reactions (Scheme 3). Ethyl diazoacetate
7 failed to undergo cyclopropenation with 3a. Instead
CÀCl insertion occurred into the solvent dichloro-
methane to produce the dichloro derivative 8 in 85% yield.
Similar reactivity has been reported for silver scorpionate
catalysts.14 Diazomalonate also did not afford the desired
cyclopropene products. The 1H NMR analysis of the crude
reaction mixture showed that the diazo compounds remained
unchanged. Silver complexes are known to be capable of
forming thermally stable complexes with diazo compounds
We commenced the study by investigating the use of
various readily available silver salts in the cyclopropena-
tion of 1-phenyl-1-propyne 3a with methyl phenyldiazoa-
cetate 5. Indeed, cyclopropene 4a was obtained in excellent
Scheme 3
(6) Petiniot, N.; Anciaux, A. J.; Noels, A. F.; Hubert, A. J.; Teyssie,
Ph. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 1239.
(7) For reviews, see: (a) Doyle, M. P. Russ. Chem. Bull. 1994, 43,
1770. (b) Doyle, M. P. Pure Appl. Chem. 1998, 70, 1123. (c) Doyle, M. P.
Enantiomer 1999, 4, 621. (d) Doyle, M. P.; Hu, W. Synlett 2001, 43, 5997.
(8) (a) Doyle, M. P.; Winchester, W. P.; Hoorn, J. A.; Lynch, V.;
Simonsen, S. H.; Ghosh, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9968. (b)
Doyle, M. P.; Protopova, M.; Muller, P.; Ene, D.; Shapiro, E. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8492. (c) Lou, Y.; Horikawa, M.; Kloster, R. A.;
Hawryluk, N. A.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 60, 1803.
(9) For cyclopropenation with acceptor-/acceptor-substituted diazo
compounds, see: (a) Cui, X.; Xu, X.; Lu, H.; Zhu, S.; Wojtas, L.; Zhang,
P. X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3304. (b) Uehara, M.; Suematsu, H.;
Yasutomi, Y.; Katsuki, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 170.
(10) For cyclopropenation with donor-/acceptor-substituted diazo
compounds, see: (a) Lee, G. H.; Davies, H. M. L. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
1233. (b) Briones, J. F.; Hansen, J.; Hardcastle, K. I.; Autschbach, J.;
Davies, H. M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 17211. (c) Briones, J. F.;
Davies, H. M. L. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 4313.
(11) (a) Thompson, J.; Davies, H. M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
6090. (b) Hansen, J. H.; Davies, H. M. L. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 457. (c)
Yue, Y.; Wang, Y.; Hu, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 3975.
(12) For a review on Wolff rearrangement involving silver salts, see:
Kirmse, W. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 2193.
(13) For recent examples on silver-catalyzed Wolff rearrangement,
see: (a) Seki, H.; Georg, G. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 15512. (b)
Seki, H.; Georg, G. I. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2147.
containing two electron-withdrawing groups,15,16 and this
may explain the lack of reactivity with these systems.
Ethyl-2-diazopropanoate 10 was converted to ethyl
(14) Dias, H. V. R.; Browning, R. G.; Polach, S. A.; Diyabalanage,
H. V. K.; Lovely, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9270.
(15) Julian, R. R.; May, J. A.; Stoltz, B. M.; Beauchamp, J. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4478.
(16) Dias, H. V. R.; Polach, S. A. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 4676.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 15, 2011
3985