L. Cronin et al.
The standard parameters for a medium mass data acquisition were used.
Typical working conditions: the end plate voltage was set to À500 V and
the capillary to +4500 V; the collision cell was set to collision energy
À8.0 eVzÀ1 with a maximum gas flow rate of 4.0 LhÀ1. Acetonitrile
(Merck) containing the electrolyte Bu4NBF4 (Fluka of Puriss Grade) was
used for all voltammetric studies. Solutions used for electrochemical stud-
ies were degassed with argon for at least 10 min to remove dioxygen.
C172H380N12O128P4V6W30: C 19.47, H 3.61, N 1.58; found: C 19.66, H 3.77,
N 1.60.
Synthesis of 2: The synthetic procedure was the same as that used for 1
except that L2 was used instead of L1. Yield 0.94 g (0.09 mmol, 92%,
based on TBA5H4[P2V3W15O62]); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN): d=3.129
(s, 2H; CH2C), 5.72 (s, 12H; -CH2O), 6.87 ppm (s, 2H; NH), in addition
to the TBA resonances; FT-IR (KBr): n˜ =3452.7 (w), 2962.7 (m), 2935.7
(m), 2874.0 (m), 1631.8 (w), 1562.3 (w), 1465.9(m), 1381.0 (w), 1084.0 (s),
949.0 (s), 902.7 (s), 790.8 (s), 717.5 cmÀ1 (s); elemental analysis calcd (%)
for C171H378N12O126P4V6W30: C 19.44, H 3.61, N 1.59; found: C 19.24, H
3.65, N 1.55.
Electrochemical experiments were undertaken at (19Æ1)8C with
a
Model Versastat 4 electro analysis system by Princeton Applied Research
using a standard three-electrode configuration. The working electrode
used for cyclic voltammetry was glassy carbon (1.5 mm diameter, BAS).
The auxiliary electrode was a Pt mesh. The reference electrode consisted
of a silver wire dipped into CH3CN (electrolyte) but separated from the
test solution by a porous frit. The glassy carbon working electrode was
polished with alumina (3 mm) on polishing pads, rinsed with distilled
water and sonicated in acetone solution before each experiment.
Synthesis of 3: The synthetic procedure was the same as that used for 1
except that L3 was used instead of L1. Yield 0.92 g (0.09 mmol, 90%,
based on TBA5H4[P2V3W15O62]); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN): d=6.31
(s, 2H; NH), 5.72 (s, 12H; -CH2O), 2.43 ppm (s, 4H,-CH2-CO-), in addi-
tion to the TBA resonances. FT-IR: n˜ =3452.7 (w), 2958.9 (m), 2931.9
(m), 2874.0 (m), 1678.1 (w), 1608.6 (m) 1462.0 (m), 1377.2 (w)1157.3 (w),
1084.0 (s), 949.0 (s), 902.7 (s), 790.8 (s), 709.8 cmÀ1 (s); elemental analysis
calcd (%) for C172H380N12O126P4V6W30: C 19.53, H 3.62, N 1.59; found:
C19.51, H 3.64, N 1.56.
Synthesis of ligands: Ligands L1, L2 and L3 were synthesised according to
published procedures.[24,25] L5 was synthesised using synthetic procedure
similar to that of L1–L3 by refluxing triethyl 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate
(294 mg, 1 mmol) with tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (363 mg,
3 mmol) in methanol (40 mL) for 6 days. The desired product, which
came out of the mother liquor as a white precipitate, was collected by fil-
tering the mother liquor while hot and recrystallised from a mixture of
EtOH/H2O. Yield: 0.2 g, 38%. The formation of the product was con-
firmed by comparing the analytical data with the literature report.[28]
Synthesis of L4: Diethyl 2,2’-bipyridine-4,4’-dicarboxylate was prepared
according to the published procedures.[29] A mixture of diethyl 2, 2’-bipyr-
idine-4, 4’-dicarboxylate (0.15 g, 0.5 mmol) and (HOCH2)3CNH2 (0.18 g,
1.5 mmol) in methanol (50 mL) was refluxed for 48 h. A white precipitate
was isolated by filtration from hot solution and dried under vacuum.
Yield 0.10 g (0.22 mmol, 44%); m. p. 144–1458C; 1H NMR (400 MHz,
[D6]DMSO): d=3.74 (d, J=5.6 Hz, 12H; -CH2OH), 4.73 (t, J=5.6 Hz,
6H; -OH), 7.72 (s, 2H; -NH-), 7.80 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H; Ar-H), 8.73 (s,
2H; Ar-H), 8.86 ppm (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H; Ar-H); IR (KBr, 400–
4000 cmÀ1): n˜ =3289 (s), 2940 (m), 1645 (m), 1590 (w), 1550 (m), 1461
(m), 1397 (w), 1364 (w), 1308 (w), 1288 (w), 1243 (w), 1041 (s), 1022 (s),
874 (w), 788 (w), 754 (w), 701 (w), 629 cmÀ1 (m); elemental analysis calcd
(%) for C20H26N4O8: C 53.33, H 5.82, N 12.44; found: C 53.40, H 5.84, N
12.53.
Synthesis of L6: Ligand L6 was synthesised by using a synthetic procedure
similar to that used for L5 by refluxing triethyl 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-tricar-
boxylate (297 mg, 1 mmol) with tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane
(363 mg, 3 mmol) in methanol (40 mL) for 3 days. The desired product,
which came out of the mother liquor as a white precipitate, was collected
by filtering the mother liquor while hot and recrystallised from a mixture
of EtOH/H2O. Yield: 0.31 g (59%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, [D6]DMSO):
d=3.74 (d, J=5.6 Hz, 12H; -CH2OH), 4.86 (t, J=5.6 Hz, 6H; -OH),
8.39 ppm (s, 3H; -NH-); IR (KBr): n˜ =3344.6 (m), 2947.3 (w), 2889.4 (w)
1681.9 (s), 1523.8 (s), 1465.9 (m), 1419.6 (m) 1357.9 (m), 1253.7 (m),
1114.8 (m) 1037.74(s) 1014.5 (s), 891.1 (w), 798.5 (w), 744.5 (m), 628.8 (s)
cmÀ1; elemental analysis calcd (%) for C18H30N6O12: C 41.38, H 5.79, N
16.09; found: C 40.91, H 5.80, N 15.95.
Synthesis of 4: The synthetic procedure was the same as that used for 1
except that L4 was used instead of L1 and the solution was heated to
reflux for 9 days. The yellow precipitate was isolated by filtration and
dried overnight under vacuum. Yield 0.95 g (0.09 mmol, 91%, based on
TBA5H4[P2V3W15O62]; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN): d=9.16 (d, J=
8.4 Hz, 2H; Ar), 8.52 (m, 2H; Ar), 8.42 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H; Ar), 7.10 (s,
2H; NH), 5.89 ppm (s, 12H; -CH2O), in addition to the TBA resonances;
FT-IR (KBr): n˜ =3423 (w), 2961 (m), 2933 (m), 2877 (m), 1655 (w), 1557
(w), 1544 (m), 1482 (m), 1379 (w), 1086 (s), 953 (s), 913 (s), 813 (s), 735
(s), 528 (w), 471 cmÀ1 (w); elemental analysis calc (%) for
C180H382N14O126P4V6W30: C 20.20, H 3.60, N 1.83; found: C 20.00, H 3.55,
N 2.13.
Synthesis of 5: The synthetic procedure was the same as that used for 1
except that L5 was used instead of L1 in a 1:3 mole ratio. Yield 0.95 g
(0.06 mmol, 92%, based on TBA5H4[P2V3W15O62]); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CD3CN): d=8.41 (s, 3H; Ar), 6.98 (s, 3H; NH), 5.91 ppm (s, 18H;
-CH2O), in addition to the TBA resonances; FT-IR (KBr): n˜ =3348.5
(w), 2962.7 (m), 2935.7 (m), 2874.0 (m), 1662.6 (w), 1481.3(m), 1381.0(w),
1265.3 (w), 1084.0 (s), 949.0 (s), 902.7 (s), 786.9 (s), 725.2 cmÀ1 (s); ele-
mental analysis calcd (%) for C261H567N18O189P6V9W45: C 19.72, H 3.59, N
1.59; found: C19.27, H 3.67, N 1.61.
Synthesis of 6: The synthetic procedure was the same as that used for 1
except that L6 was used instead of L1 in a 1:3 mole ratio. Yield 0.96 g
(0.06 mmol, 93%, based on TBA5H4[P2V3W15O62]); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CD3CN): d=8.11 (s, 3H; NH), 5.92 ppm (s, 18H; -CH2O), in addition to
the TBA resonances; FT-IR: n˜ =3464.2 (w), 2962.7 (m), 2935.7 (m),
2874.0 (m), 1631.8 (w), 1519.9 (w), 1481.3 (m), 1381.0 (w), 1084.0 (s),
949.0 (s), 902.7 (s), 790.8 (s), 725.2 cmÀ1 (s); elemental analysis calcd (%)
for C258H564N21O189P6V9W45: C 19.49, H 3.57, N 1.85; found: C19.71, H
3.68, N 1.92.
Synthesis of hybrid POMs
Synthesis of 1: TBA5H4[P2V3W15O62][30] (1.0 g, 0.2 mmol) was dissolved in
MeCN (30 mL), then L1 (0.030 g, 0.1 mmol) was added to the solution.
The reaction mixture was heated to reflux for 6 days in dark. The result-
ing yellow solution was added drop-wise to excess of diethyl ether with
vigorous stirring. The resulting yellow solid was collected and re-dis-
solved in minimum volume of MeCN, then re-precipitated by adding
dropwise to excess of diethyl ether. The yellow precipitate thus obtained
was isolated by filtration and recrystallised from acetonitrile by ether dif-
fusion. Yield 0.92 g (0.09 mmol, 89%, based on TBA5H4[P2V3W15O62]);
1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN): d=4.07 (d, J=6 Hz, 2H), 4.38 (d, J=
6 Hz, 2H), 5.78 (s, 12H; -CH2-), 6.82 ppm (s, 2H; -NH-) in addition to
the TBA resonances; FT-IR (KBr): n˜ =3356.2 (w), 2962.7 (w), 2935.7
(w), 2874.0 (w), 1662.6 (m), 1462.09 (m), 1381.0 (w), 1084.0 (s), 949.0 (s),
902.7 (s), 790.84 (s), 709.83 cmÀ1 (s); elemental analysis calcd (%) for
Acknowledgements
We thank the EPSRC, WestCHEM and the China Scholarship Council
for supporting this work. We also thank Bruker Daltonics for collabora-
tion using the microTOFQ. L.C. thanks the Royal Society and Wolfson
foundation for a merit award. H.M. thanks the Royal Society of Edin-
burgh and Marie Curie actions for the financial support.
S. G. Mitchell, C. Streb, H. N. Miras, T. Boyd, D.-L. Long, L. Cronin,
7478
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 7472 – 7479