Communications
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201101820
Palladium Catalysis
Palladium-Catalyzed Elimination/Isomerization of Enol Triflates into
1,3-Dienes**
Ian T. Crouch, Timothy Dreier, and Doug E. Frantz*
The prevalence of 1,3-dienes as substrates in some of the most
important transformations in organic synthesis (e.g. Diels–
Alder reactions) engenders this class of compounds as highly
sought after raw materials for carbon–carbon bond construc-
tion. In addition, nature has incorporated 1,3-dienes into a
multitude of biologically active natural products, thus further
solidifying the broad interest of this functional group beyond
simple methodology development. Nonetheless, despite their
pervasiveness and significant efforts from the synthetic
community, the stereoselective synthesis of functionalized,
highly substituted 1,3-dienes remains a formidable chal-
lenge.[1–4]
Our venture into the synthesis of 1,3-dienes began with a
program to identify nontraditional reaction manifolds of
stereodefined enol triflates because of their ability to act as
pluripotent substrates with various catalysts and nucleophiles.
In addition, our ability to readily access enol triflates with
precise control of the acyclic stereochemistry provides the
opportunity to exploit the unique reactivity differences
between stereoisomeric starting materials.[5] Herein, we
report a conceptually new and mechanistically distinct
catalytic reaction of enol triflates that is mediated by a
commercially available palladium(0) catalyst en route to
substituted 1,3-dienes (Scheme 1).
decision was driven by two prevailing ideas. First, we were
committed to identify a commercially available palladium
catalyst for utmost simplicity and practicality in the imple-
mentation of this method. Second, we needed a catalyst that
could rapidly undergo facile reductive elimination of triflic
acid from a [LnPdH(OTf)] intermediate to regenerate the
active palladium(0) catalyst, thus minimizing the lifetime of
the palladium-hydride intermediates. The elegant studies of
Fu and co-workers showed that the reductive elimination of
HX from a [LnPdHX] species can be a kinetically and
thermodynamically favored process when L = P(tBu)3, and
therefore simplified our decision to use this catalyst.[6] In
addition to catalyst choice, from the outset it was not clear
whether we would encounter differential activity between the
Z and E enol triflates given the fact that their internal
chelation environments are significantly different (on the
assumption that a stereospecific oxidative addition of palla-
Table 1: Survey of the reaction conditions.[a]
Entry Enol
Triflate[b]
Solvent Base
Additive
Yield [%][c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
(E)-1
DMSO Hꢀnig’s
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9
(E)-1
(E)-1
(E)-1
(E)-1
(E)-1
(E)-1
(E)-1
(E)-1
(E)-1
(E)-1
(E)-1
DCE
CH3CN Hꢀnig’s
THF Hꢀnig’s
EtOAc Hꢀnig’s
DMF Hꢀnig’s
Hꢀnig’s
51
66
65
54
47
82
24
14
65
43
80[e]
0
Scheme 1. Catalytic elimination/isomerization of enol triflates into 1,3-
dienes. Tf=trifluoromethanesulfonyl.
toluene Hꢀnig’s
toluene Et3N
9
toluene DIPA
toluene PMP
toluene Cy2NMe
10
11
12
Our initial experiments for the tandem elimination/
isomerization of enol triflates were guided by a rational
decision to use [Pd(PtBu3)2] as our catalyst of choice. This
toluene Na2CO3 H2O[d]
13[f] (E)-1
toluene Na2CO3 P(tBu3)[g]
toluene Na2CO3 H2O[h]
14
15
(Z)-1
(Z)-1
0
toluene Hꢀnig’s TMSOTf[i]
toluene Hꢀnig’s P(tBu3)[g] + TMSOTf[i]
82[h]
0
16[f] (Z)-1
[*] I. T. Crouch, T. Dreier, Prof. D. E. Frantz
Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at San Antonio
San Antonio, TX 78249 (USA)
[a] Reactions performed at 0.2m using 1.0 equiv of enol triflate and
2.0 equiv of base. [b] Isomeric purity is >99% as determined by LC/MS.
[c] HPLC assay yields for the 2E,4E stereoisomer using an analytical
standard of the product. [d] Used 2 equiv. [e] Isolated in 80% yield as a
10:1 ratio of (2E,4E)/(2E:4Z) stereoisomers. [f] No catalyst. [g] Used
20 mol%. [h] Isolated in 80% yield as a 10:1 ratio of (2E,4E)/(2E:4Z)
stereoisomers. [i] Used 1 equiv. Bn=benzyl, Cy=cyclohexyl, DCE=1,2-
dichloroethane, DIPA=diisopropylamine, DMF=N,N’-dimethylform-
amide, DMSO=dimethyl sulfoxide, Hꢀnig’s=diisopropylethylamine,
PMP=1,2,2,6,6-pentamethylpiperidine, THF=tetrahydrofuran, TMS=
trimethylsilyl.
Fax: (+1)210-458-7428
E-mail: doug.frantz@utsa.edu
[**] D.E.F. would like to thank the Welch Foundation (AX-1735) and The
University of Texas at San Antonio for generous support of this
work.
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW
6128
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6128 –6132