Organic Letters
Letter
a b
,
Scheme 1. Synthesis Strategy of N-Sulfonyl Amidines
Table 1. Reaction Optimization
b
entry
solvent
T (°C)
time (h)
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
THF
DMF
DCE
DMSO
acetone
CH3CN
CH3OH
EtOH
EtOH/H2O (4:1)
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
130
80
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
4
2
2
2
2
2
40
23
37
18
nr
74
trace
80
nr
69
74
64
68
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
120
110
110
110
c
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
77
73
trace
d
e f
,
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.3 mmol), 3 (0.3 mmol),
and solvent (2.0 mL) in a sealed tube with an air atmosphere stirred
b
c
for 2 h. Isolated yield. 1a (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), 3 (0.2 mmol).
d
e
f
1a (0.4 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), 3 (0.2 mmol). N2 O2.
Ortho substituents such as 2-Me (5j), 2-Br (5k), and 2-CF3 (5l),
afforded the corresponding products in good yield. By replacing
the proline with the piperidine-2-carboxylic acid, we isolated the
product (5m) in 60% yield. Regrettably, many substituted
pralines (5n−5q) and uncyclized N-alkyl α-carboxylic acids
(5r−5t) have been tested under the standard conditions, and
products have not been detected.
withdrawing character (4s) were well tolerated, but 2-Cl-
phenylsulfonylazide (4q) could not be converted into the
corresponding products. Similarly, meta substituents with
diverse electronics with many substituents such as methyl
(4j), halogen (4l, 4m), and trifluoromethyl (4n) in the para
position of 1 showed good compatibility to produce the
corresponding products in about 56−65% yields. The multiple-
substituted compounds 4t (2-CH3, 4-CH3) and 4u (2-CH3, 4-
CH3, 6-CH3) were furnished in slightly lower yields than those
with other substituents. In addition, thiophene-2-sulfonyl azide
gave a 46% yield of 4v. Considering the influence of 2-
pyrrolecarbaldehyde, 1-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde, thi-
ophene-2-carbaldehyde, and furan-2-carbaldehyde in the
addition of EtOH (2 mL), we subsequently observed a 58, 56,
and 59% yield (4w, 4x, 4y) of products, respectively.
Inspired by the above results, we investigated a range of
substrates for this reaction, and the range varied with the
substituents of the aromatic aldehyde (Table 3). A large role was
also played by para substituents with diverse electronics; the
electron-donating groups (5a−5c), halogen substituents (5d,
5e) and withdrawing character (2f) all provided N-sulfonyl
amidine in good yield. Furthermore, substrates with meta
substituents that bring electron-donating groups (2n), halogens
(2o), or electron-withdrawing groups (2p) were well tolerated.
To gain a plausible mechanism for this reaction, a set of
control experiments was carried out. Initially, we found that the
yield of the desired product 4a was slightly reduced when a free-
radical scavenger such as TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-
piperidinyloxy) was added to the reaction mixture (Scheme
2a). Alternatively, using pyrrolidine as feedstock, the reaction
proceeded under standard conditions (Scheme 2b), and the
desired product 4a was not isolated. It is suggested that the
carboxyl group of proline is essential for mediating this reaction.
Finally, we did not detect intermediate 6 (Scheme 2c) in the
absence of 1H-pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde, which clearly indicates
that the aldehyde plays a crucial part in the reaction.
Additionally, the reaction is affected by the atmosphere in
which it is located. For example, in an atmosphere of nitrogen or
oxygen, the reaction will be inhibited (Table 1, entry 16).
On the basis of the above experimental investigations and
several well-documented reports,16,17 a plausible mechanism is
proposed (Scheme 3). First, the condensation of aldehyde with
proline causes the formation of oxazolidin-5-one (A), a known
intermediate in the subsequent decarboxylative formation of the
azomethine ylide intermediate (B).30 Second, the dipole (B)
reacts with 1a and H+ to generate intermediate (C). Meanwhile,
a cascade reaction proceeds through a sequential nucleophilic
addition and denitrogenation reaction to give intermediate (D).
1235
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 1234−1238