Job/Unit: O50098
/KAP1
Date: 16-02-15 14:36:19
Pages: 6
N. Sakai, H. Hori, Y. Ogiwara
SHORT COMMUNICATION
nucleophilically attacks the iminium, which leads to the
production of N,N-aminal intermediate B. Third, the reac-
tion of the intermediate with the copper catalyst generates
copper enolate intermediate C, and the intermediate un-
dergoes 5-endo-dig intramolecular cyclization to construct
the nitrogen-containing five-membered ring skeleton D.
This mechanism also implies that the copper catalyst would
simultaneously activate a relatively soft electrophile, a
carbon–carbon triple bond moiety on intermediate C,
facilitating intramolecular cyclization. This discussion is
supported by the fact that an N,O-acetal either with a non-
enolizable group, such as a phenyl or a nitrile group, or
without a substituted group did not yield the expected pyr-
role derivative (see Table 4) and that the expected [4+1] an-
nulation did not proceed without the copper catalyst.
Finally, both protonation and aromatization through the
liberation of a secondary amine of ring product D occurred
to produce the corresponding pyrrole derivative 3, along
with a regeneration of the copper(II) catalyst.
Experimental Section
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Pyrrole Derivatives with 1
and 2: In a glove box, CuCl2 (0.0200 mmol, 2.69 mg) was weighed
directly into a screw-glass vial. The vial was sealed with a PTFE
sealed screw cap under a N2 atmosphere and was removed from
the glove box. To the vial were successively added a magnetic
stirring bar, distilled toluene (1 mL), propargylamine
1
(0.400 mmol), and N,O-acetal 2 (0.440 mmol). The solution was
stirred at 100 °C for 2 h. After the reaction, the resultant mixture
was filtered through a pad of silica gel. The filtrate was purified by
silica gel chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 9:1) to give the corre-
sponding pyrrole derivative 3.
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Detailed experimental procedures and characterization data
for the products obtained by this method and copies of the 1H and
13C NMR spectra of the products.
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by the Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) through a
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (No. 25410120). We
deeply thank Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd., for the gift of hydro-
silanes.
[1] a) G. W. Gribble in Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II
(Eds.: A. R. Katritzky, C. W. Rees, E. F. V. Scriven), Pergamon,
Oxford, 1996, vol. 2, pp. 207–257; b) F. Bellina, R. Rossi, Tetra-
hedron 2006, 62, 7213–7256; c) V. Estevez, M. Villacampa, J. C.
Menendez, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 4633–4657.
[2] For selected papers of a Hantzsch pyrrole synthesis see: a) A.
Hantzsch, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1890, 23, 1474–1476; b) V.
Estevez, M. Villacampa, J. C. Menendez, Chem. Commun.
2013, 49, 591–593; c) See also ref 1c and references cited
therein.
[3] For selected papers of a Piloty–Robinson pyrrole synthesis see:
a) O. Piloty, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1910, 43, 489–498; b) G. M.
Robinson, R. Robinson, J. Chem. Soc. Trans. 1918, 113, 639–
645; c) H. Posvic, R. Dombro, H. Ito, T. Telinski, J. Org. Chem.
1974, 39, 2575–2580; d) B. C. Milgram, K. Eskildsen, S. M.
Richter, W. R. Scheidt, K. A. Scheidt, J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
3941–3944.
Scheme 3. A plausible reaction mechanism for copper-catalyzed
[4+1] annulation.
[4] For selected papers of a Barton–Zard pyrrole synthesis see: a)
D. H. R. Barton, S. Z. Zard, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1985, 1098–1100; b) D. H. R. Barton, J. Kervagoret, S. Z. Zard,
Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 7587–7598; c) A. Bhattacharya, S.
Cherukuri, R. E. Plata, N. Patel, V. Tamez Jr., J. A. Grosso,
M. Peddicord, V. A. Palaniswamy, Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
5481–5484; d) A. R. Coffin, M. A. Roussell, E. Tserlin, E. T.
Pelkey, J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6678–6681; e) S. Banala, K.
Wurst, B. Kräutler, Helv. Chim. Acta 2010, 93, 1192–1198.
[5] For selected papers of a Parr–Knorr pyrrole synthesis see; a)
L. Knorr, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1884, 17, 1635–1642; b) C.
Paal, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1885, 18, 367–371; c) H. S. P. Rao,
S. Jothilingam, H. W. Scheeren, Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 1625–
1630; d) B. K. Banik, I. Banik, M. Renteria, S. K. Dasgupta,
Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2643–2645; e) G. Minetto, L. F. Ra-
veglia, A. Sega, M. Taddei, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 5277–
5288; f) G. E. Veitch, K. L. Bridgwood, K. Rands-Trevor, S. V.
Ley, Synlett 2008, 2597–2600.
Conclusions
In summary, we have demonstrated the copper(II)-
catalyzed [4+1] annulation of propargylamines with N,O-
acetals that possess an ester, a ketone, and an amide unit,
leading to the facile production of polysubstituted pyrrole
derivatives. The key to this [4+1] annulation series is the
use of an N,O-acetal that can be enolizable. Also, we have
disclosed significant results: (1) with the copper catalyst,
these N,O-acetals effectively function as a C1 unit of a pyr-
role skeleton; (2) the central sp3-carbon displays the func-
tions of both an electrophile and a nucleophile; and (3) the
annulation series was achieved through both 5-endo-dig
cyclization and a subsequent aromatization. Furthermore,
we have demonstrated the copper(II)-catalyzed direct cou-
pling reaction of a propargylamine and ethyl glyoxylate in
the presence of a secondary amine, leading to the pro-
duction of a pyrrole derivative.
[6] For selected papers of a Clauson–Kaas pyrrole synthesis see:
a) N. Clauson-Kass, Z. Tyle, Acta Chem. Scand. 1952, 6, 667–
670; b) A. D. Josey, E. L. Jenner, J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 2466–
2470; c) B. S. Gourlay, P. P. Molesworth, J. H. Ryan, J. A.
Smith, Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 799–801; d) N. Azizi, A.
4
www.eurjoc.org
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 0000, 0–0